120 likes | 135 Views
Explore how Weighted Feature to Measurement Relationships optimize part features for enhanced performance in design and assembly processes. Learn applications, benefits, and examples. Improve product reliability and reduce costs with relationship fitting.
E N D
Simultaneous Design Constraint Optimization using Weighted Feature to Measurement Relationships Authors: Dave Cantoni Boeing Commercial Airplane Group Scott Sandwith New River Kinematics 2002 Coordinate Measurement System Committee Providence, RI
Introduction • Relationshipscapture the distances between objects • Collections of objects (describe common relationships) Part Features • Directly optimize part featuresBest Performance • Transform instruments and parts with Relationships (ERS* – is not needed!) • Relationships vs. Optical Tooling Points • Applications and Examples • Summary * Enhanced Reference System
Classic Optimization Points to Points Points to Surface Relationships Point to Point Point to Objects Groups to Objects Frame to Frame Object to Object … Etc. ERS Relationships Background: Relationships
Benefits of Relationship Fitting • Optimize product performance • Relationship between features are optimized directly! Build / Inspect • Cost savings and flow time reduction • OTP maintenance and time • Set/Inspect part features directly from CAD • Reduces measurement tolerance guess work • Improves assembly reliability • Custom configurations directly on the shop floor • Integrate assembly configuration for design/tolerance improvements
Application • Door Surface, Hinge Line, and Trim vs. ERS
Relationship Optimization Results Dependent on ERS Feature Relationship Optimization
Application • Fuselage Assembly Frame to Frame
Application • Assemble Spar Features
Application: Spar Inspection • Spar Hinge Line, Web Surface, Upper and Lower Cords
Summary • Relationship Optimization will improve results over traditional processes. • Relationships reduce the amount of tolerance information vs. the OTP process. • Preparation, Setup, and Flow time are minimized • Using the CAD Geometry in Relationships improves part and trend analysis. • Using part tolerances instead of tooling tolerances enables significant cost savings.
Acknowledgements • Mike O’Brien of Boeing • Dr. Robert Salerno, Joseph Calkins, and Bruce Thomas of NRK • Rick Cole and Mark Wilmoth of Brunson
Simultaneous Design Constraint Optimization using Weighted Feature to Measurement Relationships