1 / 10

1840 - 1860

1840 - 1860 . A Clustering of Innovation. Let the Clustering Begin!. 1841 Calotype (Talbot) 1842 Cyanotype (Herschel) 1840’s Albumen (Talbot, Niepce, Blanquart- Evard) 1851 Collodion (Archer) 1850’s Ambrotype (Archer, Fry) 1853 Tintype (Martin) 1856 Oxymel (Llewelyn).

edie
Download Presentation

1840 - 1860

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. 1840 - 1860 A Clustering of Innovation

  2. Let the Clustering Begin! • 1841 Calotype (Talbot) • 1842 Cyanotype (Herschel) • 1840’s Albumen (Talbot, Niepce, Blanquart- Evard) • 1851 Collodion (Archer) • 1850’s Ambrotype (Archer, Fry) • 1853 Tintype (Martin) • 1856 Oxymel (Llewelyn)

  3. 1841 - Calotype Process • Positive/Negative process introduced by Fox Talbot • Paper brushed with weak salt and silver nitrate solution • Competed with the Daguerreotype

  4. Calotype vs. Daguerreotype • Advantages • could make an unlimited number of prints • retouching could be done on negative or print • prints on paper were easier to examine, less delicate • had warmer tones • Disadvantages • arrested by patent restrictions • materials less sensitive to light, longer exposure time • imperfections of paper reduced quality • process had two stages positive/negative, took longer • prints tended to fade with time

  5. 1842 - Cyanotype • Introduced by Sir John Herschel • Used iron salts instead of silver compounds • Highly stable • Brilliant blue images • Most popular around the turn of the century • Used for architectural blueprints

  6. Late 1840’s - Albumen • Introduced by Abel Niepce • Search to combine best of Daguerreotype and Calotype • Albumen (the white of an egg) used as a binder on glass • Fine detail, improved quality, but slow process time • Blanquart-Evrard took albumen and used it on paper • Process kept chemical “on the paper”, not in it which produced finer detail and glossy • Some critics of the glossy image

  7. 1851 - Collodion • Introduced by Frederick Scott Archer • Used gun cotton as a binding agent • Used glass plates, very sharp images, better quality than Daguerreotype and Calotype • Difficult process and somewhat dangerous • Never patented, allowed further innovations to spawn from it

  8. 1850’s - Ambrotype • Introduced by Fred Scott Archer and Peter Fry • Inexpensive • No lateral reversal • Could be viewed from any angle

  9. 1853 - Tintype • Introduced by Adolphe Alexandre Martin • Used enamelled tinplate instead of glass • One step process, no negative • Inexpensive • Robust

  10. 1856 - Oxymel • Introduced by J. D. Llewelyn • One of the first “Dry” processes to be used • Illustrated Evening News hailed it as a considerable advance • Negatives prepared in advance and later developed at leisure

More Related