1 / 74

Grant Writing for the National Coastal Wetlands Conservation Grant Program

Grant Writing for the National Coastal Wetlands Conservation Grant Program. Topics. Contacts Introduction to the grant program Scoring criteria and making the best of it Rank, Review, and Selection Process Tips for a winning proposal Additional information. Regional Office Contacts.

ehicks
Download Presentation

Grant Writing for the National Coastal Wetlands Conservation Grant Program

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Grant Writingfor theNational Coastal Wetlands Conservation Grant Program

  2. Topics Contacts Introduction to the grant program Scoring criteria and making the best of it Rank, Review, and Selection Process Tips for a winning proposal Additional information

  3. Regional Office Contacts • Samantha Marcum, Coastal Program Regional Coordinator • Responsible for: project development, review & national ranking (samantha_marcum@fws.gov) • Bart Prose,Grants Administrator • Responsible for: project eligibility, review, & grant administration for restoration projects (bart_prose@fws.gov) • Becky Miller,Grants Administrator • Responsible for: grant administration for land acquisition projects (becky_a_miller@fws.gov)

  4. What is the Coastal Program? • 23 High priority coastal ecosystems recognized in the United States • Four goals guide the program: • Serve coastal communities • Conserve pristine coastal habitats • Restore degraded coastal habitats • Focus resources through conservation alliances

  5. Pacific Southwest Region Coastal Program Mission: To efficiently achieve voluntary habitat conservation, through financial and technical assistance, for the benefit of Federal Trust Species. • 4 Local Coastal Programs in CA: • Humboldt Bay • San Francisco Bay • San Diego Bay • Central California Coast

  6. Local Program ManagerContacts Samantha Marcum Regional Coordinator, Santa Cruz (831) 427-4753 Paula Golightly, Humboldt Bay, (707) 822-7201 John Klochak, San Francisco Bay, (510) 792-0222 Denis Rutenberg, Hydrologist/Engineer w/NRCS, Salinas Shawn Milar, North Central Coast, (805) 612-2794 Mary Root, South Central Coast, (805) 644-1766 Carolyn Lieberman, San Diego Bay, (760) 431-9440

  7. Coastal Program & National Coastal Wetlands Conservation Grants Coastal Program • Collaborates with state & other partners and provides technical assistance about the grant & proposal • Coordinates with partners to identify and develop projects and assist with application • Provides input into the development of program guidance and participates in the evaluation & ranking NCWG • To conserve pristine coastal habitats; 2) To restore degraded coastal wetlands and adjacent habitats by working with partners; 3) To leverage financial resources and multiply the impact of taxpayer dollars.

  8. National Coastal Wetlands Conservation Grants Coastal Wetlands Planning, Protection, & Restoration Act (Sec. 305, Title III, Public Law 101-646, 16 USC 3954) Purpose: Long-term conservation of coastal wetlands ecosystems - Help States acquire, restore, and enhance coastal wetlands $200,000 to $1 million/project

  9. Program Overview 2011 – 24 projects, $19 M 2010 – 25 projects, $19.1 M 2009 – 25 projects, $20.1 M 2008 – 29 projects, $20.8 M 2007 – 24 projects, $18.7 M 2006 – 19 projects, $15.1 M 2005 – 16 projects, $13 M Funding typically shared by 10-15 States

  10. National Coastal Wetlands Conservation Grants Eligible Applicants State agencies designated by Governor: Coastal Conservancy California Department of Fish and Game Wildlife Conservation Board California Natural Resources Agency California Coastal Commission Several Conservancies,CCC

  11. Eligible Activities Acquisition of a real property interest in coastal wetlands and/or waters. 2. Restoration, enhancement, or management of coastal wetland ecosystems.

  12. Ineligible Activities Navigation, irrigation, flood control Mitigation Wetland creation Enforcement

  13. Ineligible Activities Research Planning (as a primary focus) Operations & maintenance Upper portions of watersheds

  14. Timeline Now-June 27: Work with Local Managers of Coastal Program to design project and develop your proposal May 16 – Pre-proposals “due” for early review by FWS Regional Office (RO) - email to Bart and Samantha June 9 – RO will return pre-proposals no later than this date June 27 – Begin trying to submit proposals online June 30 – Official submissions due to FWS RO or grants.gov Aug-Oct – Site visits by Regional & Local Managers of Coastal Program Sept 9, 4pm – Additional Letters of Commitment due to RO October – National Ranking Team ranks proposals Dec 2011/Jan 2012 – Awards announced January 2012 (+) – Complete Environmental Compliance & obligate $$

  15. Assembling the Package

  16. Content and Form of the Proposal Package Application for Federal Assistance (SF-424) Budget Information (SF 424A, 424C, or similar table) Assurances (SF 424B or 424D) Project Statement = 35 PAGE LIMIT!! Letters of Commitment from non-State match providers

  17. Project Statement Sets Rationale and Objectives Delineates Annual Work Segments Lists Results and Benefits Describes Approaches & Evaluations Establishes Estimated Costs Lists Personnel and Location of Work

  18. Project Statement • Need • Why is the project being undertaken? • How does the identified need relate to the grant program? • What evidence is there of the need?

  19. Project Statement • Objectives • What – not how • Specify exactly what you hope to accomplish in relation to the problem or need • If grant proposal is part of a larger project, clearly distinguish the elements proposed for the grant • Specify a date everyone recognizes as when it will be accomplished

  20. Project Statement • Objectives • Output / Benefit Oriented • Realistic given the time, funds and materials • Accomplishments must be measurable or verifiable

  21. Objectives SMART Specific Measurable Achievable Realistic Time-limited

  22. Writing the Objectives • By December 31, 2011; • Protect 563 acres of coastal wetlands; • Restore or enhance 450 acres of • palustrine emergent and estuarine intertidal emergent wetland habitat comprising 80% of the project area; • Manage the project area in perpetuity • for the conservation of coastal wetland habitat and the fish and wildlife populations that depend on them.

  23. Project Statement • Expected Results • Increased benefits to coastal lands, waters, fish, and wildlife - What and how is this determined? • Increased access and use – How much, how measured and who will benefit? • Economic impact – How measured? • Increased recreational opportunity – How measured?

  24. Project Statement • Approach • How will you reach the objective(s) in the time allotted? • Specific procedures • Schedules • Key project staff functions • Cooperators

  25. Project Statement • Location • Where will the work be done? • Include 3 maps at different scales • Photos

  26. Project Statement • Estimated Cost • How much does it cost? How do you know? • Federal & Grantee share (based on federal grant amount) • Non-federal Cost Share only based on part of project funded by grant (not total project) • Cost Detail – Cost categories or job costs? • No Miscellaneous or Contingency costs

  27. Project Statement • Other Elements • Description of State Trust Fund • Contribution to other ongoing efforts in the region • Key personnel • Public involvement

  28. Ranking Criteria Wetlands Conservation (7 points) Maritime forests on coastal barriers (0 points) Long-term conservation (7 points) Coastal watershed management (3 points) Conservation of threatened and endangered species (5 points) Benefits to fish (5 points) Benefits to coastal-dependent or migratory birds (5 points)

  29. Ranking Criteria (cont.) 8. Prevent or reduce contamination (5 points) 9. Catalyst for future conservation (4 points) 10. Partners in conservation (4 points) 11. Federal share reduced (5 points) 12. Education/outreach program or wildlife-oriented recreation (3 points) 13. Other factors (4 points) “Summary of the Ranking Criteria” is a good format to follow.

  30. Wetlands Conservation

  31. Maritime Forests on Coastal Barriers “Broad-leaved forests that occur on barrier islands and along the mainland coast from Delaware to Texas” 0 POINTS= We do not have this habitat type in California

  32. Long-term Conservation

  33. Coastal Watershed Management

  34. Conservation of Threatened and Endangered Species

  35. Conservation of State Species of Concern (Maximum of 5 points for Category 5a and b; maximum of 2 points for 5b)

  36. Benefits to Fish

  37. Benefits to Coastal-Dependent or Migratory Birds

  38. Prevent or Reduce Contamination

  39. Catalyst for Future Conservation

  40. Partners in Conservation Note: These contributions will not “count” if there is no corresponding letter of commitment!

  41. Federal Share Reduced

  42. Education/Outreach Program or Wildlife-Oriented Recreation

  43. Other factors

  44. Other Factors Rare or threatened habitat types, biologically diverse habitats Cost effective Invasive species Cultural or historical resources benefits Climate Change

  45. Additional Considerations Used as tie breakers Must be addressed Would prevent the destruction or degradation of habitat from pending sale. Would protect unique and significant biological diversity. Has lower cost per acre conserved. Provides lands as matching funds.

  46. Grant Writing Tips - General

  47. Writing Competitive Grants • Key Points • Address all ranking criteria • Identify critical dates in the process • Understand how ranking criteria effects your score

More Related