1 / 13

PACS IBDR

PACS IBDR. Integration, Qualification and Testing. Reinhard Katterloher. Instrument AIV and Testing. Qualification of Units is verified by the individual manufacturers before delivery to MPE, see verification matrix (left), delivery reviews will be held

ekram
Download Presentation

PACS IBDR

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. PACS IBDR Integration, Qualification and Testing • Reinhard Katterloher AIV

  2. Instrument AIV and Testing • Qualification of Units is verified by the individual manufacturers before delivery to MPE,see verification matrix (left),delivery reviews will be held • PACS Instrument Integration and Testing starts at delivery of Units, acceptance is based on ADP and Incoming Inspection Plan • Verification of PACS instrument performance is done by MPE and is based on Instrument Level Tests (ILTs) according to PACS-ME-PL-012; Test flow and schedules are provided • AIV program and flow charts are explained in PACS-ME-PL-018 AIV

  3. General Instrument AIV Sequence including ILTs for all PACS models AIV

  4. Overall Configuration of ILT Set-up during AVM+CQM, FM, FS AIV

  5. AVM Integration and Test Sequence AIV

  6. Duration AVM Instrument Test Sequence AIV

  7. CQM+AVM Instrument Integration and Test Sequence AIV

  8. Compatibility of CQM+AVM Test Program with Test Time Limitation • Full CQM calibration program could be carried out in principle • CQM schedule is tight because start date is dictated by late delivery of BOL unit/subunit and fixed delivery date of AVM and CQM to ESA • Proposed 20 % shortening of CQM test program compared to PFM program is achieved by reducing the test parameter space for certain test articles • results in less information concerning calibration, e.g., linearity, sensitivity, sample points in calibration curves etc. • keeps full information on design verification, e.g., search for ghosts in the FPU spectrometer section etc. • maintains the chance of not missing a last feed-back to a PFM improvement AIV

  9. Duration CQM+AVM Instrument Test Sequence AIV

  10. PFM Instrument Integration and Test Sequence AIV

  11. Duration PFM Instrument Test Sequence AIV

  12. FS Instrument Integration and Test Sequence AIV

  13. Duration FS FPU Instrument Test Sequence AIV

More Related