330 likes | 343 Views
Join Jenny Lee, Heather Ramsier, and Denise Richardson for an overview of the assessment cycle, data review, and next steps for the 2017-2018 academic year. Explore the impact of Valencia's Five-Year Impact Plan on general education and discuss the use of evidence in critical thinking and oral and interpersonal communication. Address concerns about student performance and graduation rates, and join a facilitated discussion on rubrics.
E N D
Assessment Day 2017 New Student Experience Presented by Jenny Lee Heather Ramsier Denise Richardson
Agenda Welcome and Assessment Cycle Overview Data Review Valencia’s Five Year Impact Plan and Our Connection through General Education Facilitated Discussion with Dr. Jamil Johnson Next Steps for Assessment Year 2017-2018
Critical ThinkingIndicator: use of evidence Fall 2015: MEP Assignment Rubric Data • Last year, our data for Critical Thinking reflected: • Summer 2015 a team worked to redesign the MEP Assignment which launched in Fall 2015 • Increased percentage overall of students scoring in Satisfactory\Developing • Increased the percentage of rubric use from Fall 2014 by 20% Total % Satisfactory/ Developing for Critical Thinking: 89% Total % Satisfactory/ Developing for Critical Thinking: 86%
Critical ThinkingIndicator: use of evidence Fall 2016: Academic Blueprint Rubric Data New Year, New You 90% Spring 2017: Academic Blueprint Rubric Data 86%
Let’s Review What do you notice? What stands out to you? What are your personal interpretations? Fall 2016: Academic Blueprint Rubric Data Fall 2015: MEP Assignment Rubric Data 90% 89% Spring 2017: Academic Blueprint Rubric Data 86% 86%
Oral Communication • Last year, our data for Oral Communication reflected: • Summer 2015 a team worked to redesign the Final Story Project which launched in Fall 2015 • Levels of Achievement went from 4 (Exceptional, Developed, Acceptable, and Needs Improvement) to 3. • Increased percentage overall of students scoring in Satisfactory\Developing Fall 2015: Final Story Project Rubric Data Total % Accomplished\Acceptable: 85%
Oral Communication Fall 2016: Final Story Project Rubric Data New Year, New You 97% Spring 2017: Final Story Project Rubric Data 95%
Let’s Review What do you notice? What stands out to you? What are your personal interpretations? Fall 2016: Final Story Project Rubric Data 97% Fall 2015: Final Story Project Rubric Data 85% Spring 2017: Final Story Project Rubric Data 95%
Interpersonal Communication • Last year, our data for Interpersonal Communication reflected: • Summer 2015 a team worked to redesign the Final Story Project which launched in Fall 2015 • Increased the percentage of rubric use from Fall 2014 by 21% • Levels of Achievement went from 4 (Exceptional, Developed, Acceptable, and Needs Improvement) to 3. Fall 2015: Final Story Project Rubric Data Total % Accomplished\Acceptable: 88%
Interpersonal Communication Fall 2016: CC Personal Connection Fall 2016: Career Interview (online) 94% 91% Spring 2017: CC Personal Connection Spring 2017: Career Interview (online) 93% 88%
Let’s Review What do you notice? What stands out to you? What are your personal interpretations? Fall 2016: CC Personal Connection and Career Interview (combined) 94% Fall 2015: Final Story Project Rubric Data 88% Spring 2017 CC Personal Connection and Career Interview (combined) 92%
Valencia’s Five-YearImpact Plan And ourconnection as general education.
Personal Reflection Question:Upon reviewing your gradebook you notice that several students have missed 2 or more assignments and/or class sessions. What is your current practice for addressing this concern, if any?
Graduation Rates: By Race and Gender See the Gaps
Graduation Rates: By Course Success First Five Courses See the Gaps
All Valencia Success Rates by Gender/Ethnicity since AY 2014-2015 Institutional Research, High Risk and Grade Distribution Report
All Valencia Success Rates by Gender/Ethnicity Fall 2016 only Institutional Research, High Risk and Grade Distribution Report
SLS1122 Success Rates by Gender/Ethnicity since AY 2014-2015 Institutional Research, High Risk and Grade Distribution Report
SLS1122 Success Rates by Gender/Ethnicity Fall 2016 only Institutional Research, High Risk and Grade Distribution Report
The SFI was reviewed to identify possible correlations between African-American males that earn a D, W, or F and student responses.Students responded positively when surveyed about connecting with peers and receiving support from the instructor. Other positive feedback related to the professor connecting the assignments to the course goals and purpose.
All students taking NSE African-American male students taking NSE that earned a DWF Class Attendance
All students taking NSE Completion of Assignments African-American male students taking NSE that earned a DWF
Next Steps2017-2018 The role we as NSE all play cannot be ignored. Please consider being part of the team to continue this discussion and begin formulating strategies for AY 2017-18.
One last thing… We need to talk about RUBRICS.