1 / 18

How does AGN Feedback Evolve in Clusters of Galaxies

How does AGN Feedback Evolve in Clusters of Galaxies. Julie Hlavacek-Larrondo Einstein Fellow, Stanford University Collaborators : Andy Fabian, Steve Allen, Alastair Edge, Harald Ebeling, Jeremy Sanders, Mike Hogan and Greg Taylor. AGN feedback in Brightest Cluster Galaxies. z < 0.3.

elata
Download Presentation

How does AGN Feedback Evolve in Clusters of Galaxies

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. How does AGN Feedback Evolve in Clusters of Galaxies Julie Hlavacek-Larrondo Einstein Fellow, Stanford University Collaborators: Andy Fabian, Steve Allen, Alastair Edge, Harald Ebeling, Jeremy Sanders, Mike Hogan and Greg Taylor.

  2. AGN feedback in Brightest Cluster Galaxies z < 0.3 z > 0.3 MS0735 (z=0.21), McNamara et al. 2005 ? 200 kpc 1) Duty cycle ≥ 95 % in cool core clusters. 2) Energetics are sufficient to prevent the hot gas from cooling. Birzan et al. 2004, Rafferty et al. 2006, Dunn & Fabian 2006, 2008, Dunn et al. 2010, Birzan et al. 2008, Cavagnolo et al. 2010, Dong et al. 2010…

  3. AGN feedback in Brightest Cluster Galaxies z < 0.3 z > 0.3 LX-ray, cluster (1044 erg/s) MS0735 (z=0.21), McNamara et al. 2005 Ebeling et al. 2010 200 kpc Redshift 1) Duty cycle ≥ 95 % in cool core clusters. 2) Energetics are sufficient to prevent the hot gas from cooling. Birzan et al. 2004, Rafferty et al. 2006, Dunn & Fabian 2006, 2008, Dunn et al. 2010, Birzan et al. 2008, Cavagnolo et al. 2010, Dong et al. 2010… Hlavacek-Larrondo et al. 2012

  4. AGN feedback in z > 0.3 BrightestCluster Galaxies Fabian et al. 2012 Pcavities [1042 erg/s] Other studies Lcool ( < rcool ) [1042 erg/s] Summary of mechanical AGN feedback: 1) Duty cycles remain high (>60-95%) in z>0.3 cool core clusters. 2) Energetics are *still* sufficient to prevent the hot gas from cooling. • No significant evolution in mechanical AGN feedback (z=0.0-0.55) Hlavacek-Larrondo et al. 2012

  5. AGN feedback in z > 0.3 BrightestCluster Galaxies Light travel time: 3Gyrs 5 Gyrs 8Gyrs Log Lnucleus(2-10 keV) 32 Massive clusters with X-ray cavities Clusters with “cool cores”/AGN activity [Santos et al. 2012; Russell et al 2012; Siemiginowska et al. 2012; Iwasawa et al. 2005; McDonald et al. 2012] • A significant fraction of massive strong cool core clusters at z=1 will host quasars. • Problem for cluster surveys (see also Russell et al. 2012) 1 + z Hlavacek-Larrondo et al. 2013

  6. Conclusion How does AGN feedback evolve in BCGs? juliehl@stanford.edu Redshift = 0.0 Redshift = 0.55 5 Gyrs • No significant evolution in mechanical AGN feedback in BCGs (z = 0.0 – 0.55). • The nuclear X-ray luminosities of BCGs with X-ray cavities are rapidly evolving:  A signifiant fraction will host a quasar by z=1 (i.e. outshine the cluster X-ray emission). • Future:  SPT, Planck – many new high redshift clusters discovered. Hlavacek-Larrondo et al. 2012, MNRAS, 421, 1260; Hlavacek-Larrondo et al. 2013, MNRAS accepted, arXiv: 1211.5606

  7. Evolution of radiative AGN feedback in BCGs Light travel time: 3Gyrs 5 Gyrs 8Gyrs Log Lnucleus(2-10 keV) 32 Massive clusters with X-ray cavities Clusters with “cool cores”/AGN activity [Santos et al. 2012; Russell et al 2012; Siemiginowska et al. 2012; Iwasawa et al. 2005; McDonald et al. 2012] (1+z)4 Evolution of the star formation rate (peaks at z=2-3; e.g. Madau et al. 1996) 1 + z Hlavacek-Larrondo et al. 2013

  8. Evolution of radiative AGN feedback in BCGs Number of sources: 32 Light travel time: 3Gyrs 5 Gyrs 8Gyrs Fraction with a detectable X-ray nucleus Log Lnucleus(2-10 keV) 1 + z 1 + z Hlavacek-Larrondo et al. 2013

  9. State transition of an « actif » black hole “Thin disk” model (Shakura & Sunyaev 1973) “Thick disk” model, Advection Dominated Accretion Flow (ADAF; Narayan & Yi 1994) Ppower / PEddington 0.0001% 0.01% 1% 100% Quiescent state (e.g. SgrA*) High/Soft state 0.0001% 0.01% 1% 100% Eddington ratio Churazov et al. 2005

  10. Evolution of radiative AGN feedback in BCGs Eddington ratio Light travel time: 3Gyrs 5 Gyrs 8Gyrs Log Lnucleus(2-10 keV) “High/Soft state” Radiatively-efficient Shakura & Sunyaev 1973 1% 0.01% 0.0001% “Low/Hard state” Radiatively-inefficient Narayan& Yi 1994, 1995 Quiescent state (e.g. Sgr A*) 1 + z Hlavacek-Larrondo et al. 2013

  11. Dunn & Fabian 2006; updated AGN feedback in z > 0.3 BrightestCluster Galaxies Number Cooling time (Gyr) Cool Core Mechanical duty cycle of BHs in BCGs ≥ 60-95 % of the time. No X-ray cavities + no radio No X-ray cavities + radio X-ray cavities + radio 76 MACS clusters at z > 0.3 Number Clear X-ray cavities Potential X-ray cavities Cooling time (Gyr) Hlavacek-Larrondo et al. 2012

  12. AGN feedback in z > 0.3 BrightestCluster Galaxies CLASH: HST F814W (red), F625W (green), F475W (blue) MACS J1532.9+3021 (z=0.36; 105 ks) Lx-ray = 4 *1045 erg/s Pcavities = 4 * 1045 erg/s

  13. Below z=0.6 Semler et al. 2013

  14. Russell et al. 2013

More Related