360 likes | 533 Views
General Capabilities in the Australian Curriculum for Economics and Business Bronwyn Hession and Lyn Kirkby Economics and Business Educators NSW. Aims of the session.
E N D
General Capabilities in the Australian Curriculum for Economics and Business Bronwyn Hession and Lyn Kirkby Economics and Business Educators NSW
Aims of the session • From a curriculum design perspective, establish the global and national context and associated rationales for the integration of general capabilities into the school curriculum • Analyse, at the ‘local’ scale, a case study with specific examples of student activities as vehicles for targeting specific capabilities
Aims (continued) • Explore the notion of Economics and Business curriculum as the ‘natural home’ for specific capabilities • Respond to the implications for practitioner action including further research, evaluation and assessment design.
Session overview • The General Capabilities in the Australian Curriculum: an overview • The Global context: practice elsewhere, including the ATC21S project • General capabilities in practice: a case study using the Board of Studies NSW and the IB Middle Years Programme perspectives • The ‘natural home’ proposition: which of the general capabilities are ‘at home’ in Economics and Business curriculum? • The ‘so what ?’question: implications for practitioners and potential benefits for students.
The Policy Context An overview
General capabilities in the Australian Curriculum • ‘a key dimension of the Australian curriculum’ • Melbourne Declaration as the origin, essential, twenty first century learning • build upon state and territory initiatives • encompass knowledge, skills, behaviours and dispositions • operate across the whole curriculum • developed to inform the writing of the Australian curriculum – will be revisited
Perspectives on the General Capabilities • a bridge between the aspirational goals of the Melbourne Declaration and the ‘on the ground’ discipline content in each learning area • an ‘investment’ in the curriculum – to ensure that the knowledge and skills that students learn and acquire have some currency and value in contexts • enabling opportunities to generate greater equity and access , enhancing engagement by making learning more relevant to the lives of students. • your view?
The Political Context • ‘An increase of 1% in a country’s literacy scores relative to the international average is associated with an eventual 2.5% rise in labour productivity and a 1.5% rise in GDP per head’. (Public Investment in Skills, CD Howe Institute, Coulombe & Tremblay, 2005) • ‘Major changes in the world …are placing new demands on Australian education’. (Melbourne Declaration on Educational Goals for Young Australians, MCEETYA December 2008) • ‘Making Australia’s Education System its Next Competitive Advantage’ (Business Council of Australia Report, 2007)
The Political Context (cont.) • ‘The new funding arrangements will…make real the shared aspirations for Australian schooling … for the cultural richness, competitiveness and prosperity of the nation’. (Review of Funding for Schooling Final Report, December 2011) • ‘Madam Deputy Speaker, we know that the best way for Australians to make ends meet is to ensure they can seize opportunities to work.’ (human capital theory, economic rationalism, utility of education, education or training)
The Global Context – highly contextualised • Most education systems have their own ‘version’ of general capabilities – core skills, capacities, attributes key competencies…. • Iowa has ‘Universal constructs: Essential for 21st Century Success’ (productivity is one)
Scotland – four capacities, each with attributes and capabilities
Singapore has 4 Desired Outcomes of Education (DOE) • a confident person who has a strong sense of right and wrong, is adaptable and resilient, knows himself, is discerning in judgment, thinks independently and critically, and communicates effectively; • a self-directed learner who takes responsibility for his own learning, who questions, reflects and perseveres in the pursuit of learning; • an active contributor who is able to work effectively in teams, exercises initiative, takes calculated risks, is innovative and strives for excellence; and, • a concerned citizen who is rooted to Singapore, has a strong civic consciousness, is informed, and takes an active role in bettering the lives of others around him.
New Zealand has Key Competencies • Capabilities for living and lifelong learning • The New Zealand Curriculum identifies five key competencies: • thinking • using language, symbols, and texts • managing self • relating to others • participating and contributing
ATC21S • Assessment and Teaching of 21st Century Skills Project • http://atc21s.org/ • ‘ATC21S is an international research effort aimed at empowering students with the right skills to succeed in the 21st-century workplace’ • Sponsored by Cisco, Intel and Microsoft • Development of complex online tasks – ‘like social media games’
Assessment of 21st C skills • ATC21S is developing methods to assess skills that will form the basis for 21st-century curricula, with an emphasis on communication and collaboration, problem-solving, citizenship, and digital fluency. • Ways of thinking. Creativity, critical thinking, problem-solving, decision-making and learning • Ways of working. Communication and collaboration • Tools for working. Information and communications technology (ICT) and information literacy • Skills for living in the world. Citizenship, life and career, and personal and social responsibility
Link to international assessment and testing? • ‘But PISA is set to change. With new technological and other innovations changing the way we assess students, we can now look beyond students' ability to read, write or do math. • So called “soft skills” like collaboration and communication have been notoriously difficult to assess. But now the Assessment and Teaching of 21st Century Skills (ATC21S) project, which is sponsored by Cisco, Microsoft and Intel is breaking new ground in assessing these vital skills’. (Source: Changing tests and the PM’s 2025 goal for schools The Conversation http://theconversation.edu.au/, 21 September 2012)
The Learning Theory Context How is learning theory reflected in the General Capabilities?
Piaget (1896-1980) • Knowledge arises from actions and people actively acquire knowledge for themselves (Flavell, 163: 82, in Millar, 2007) • Succession of new structures in the brain result from active construction of knowledge and learning (Inhelder & Piaget, 1958: 338, in Millar, 2007) • Disequilibrium between mind and environment motivates cognitive development (Piaget, 1977: 13, in Millar, 2007) • Saw communication as important in learning (Inhelder & Piaget, 1958: 338, in Millar, 2007) • Importance of metacognition- process by which individuals move to a higher stage of cognition (Piaget, 1971: 320, Flavel, 1963: 263, In Millar, 2007)
Vygotsky (1896-1934) • Influence most significant since the 1960s (Millar, 2007) • Stressed role of language and social interaction in the construction of knowledge (Vygotsky, 2004: 437, in Millar, 2007) • Significant contribution to constructivist approaches to teaching and learning (Millar, 2007) • Learning and cognitive development linked to active participation of the learner- talking and writing facilitate learning (Kuhn & Hand, 1996: 123; Barnes & Todd, 1977: 15, in Millar, 2007) • Zone of Proximal Development: just beyond the individual’s intellectual comfort zone. Required for cognitive development (Vygotsky, 1978; 84, in Millar, 2007)
Learning theory and the General Capabilities? • Interconnected • Sequenced across continua • Linked to changes in conceptual capacity of learners • Recognition each student’s pace of development, ‘prior experience, sense of self in the world and cognitive capacity’ (ACARA, 2012) • Operate across the whole curriculum • Need to be contextualised in subject areas • Constructivist frame • Connected to prior learning • Importance of context, e.g. culture
So how do the General Capabilities relate to NSW and IB MYP Curriculum Frameworks? Making links in a case study context
General capabilities and a current school context • Monte Sant’ Angelo Mercy College • Catholic Independent Girls School in North Sydney • Delivers NSW Board of Studies curriculum and International Baccalaureate Middle Years Programme curriculum in years 7-10 • BOS and IB together already reflect significant aspects of the General Capabilities • We will look at • NSW BOS Commerce Syllabus • IB Middle Years Programme Learner Profile and Areas of Interaction
Literacy • Numeracy • ICT • Critical and creative thinking • Personal and social capability • Ethical behaviour • Intercultural understanding • IB learners strive to be: • Inquirers • Knowledgeable • Thinkers • Communicators • Principled • Open-minded • Caring • Risk-takers • Balanced • Reflective General Capabilities IB Learner Profile
MYP Areas of Interaction • The IB MYP Areas of Interaction can also be related to the General Capabilities • They are: • Approaches to Learning • Community and Service • Health and Social Education • Environments • Human Ingenuity
Approaches to Learning • Organisation • Time management, self management • Collaboration • Working in groups, accepting others, personal challenges • Communication Literacy • Literacy, being informed, informing others • Information Literacy • Accessing, selecting and organising information, referencing • Reflection • Self-awareness and self-evaluation • Thinking • Generating ideas, planning & inquiring, applying knowledge & concepts, identifying problems & creating solutions • Transfer • Making connections, inquiring in different contexts
Community and service • How do we live in relation to others? How can I contribute to the community? How can I help others? • Human ingenuity • Why and how do we create? What are the consequences? • Environments • Where do we live? What resources do we have or need? What are my responsibilities? • Health and social education • How do I think and act? How am I changing? How can I look after myself and others?
NSW Board of Studies Syllabus connections • The K-10 Curriculum Framework • Rationale • Objectives • Knowledge, understanding and skills • Values and attitudes • Outcomes • Cross-curriculum content- significant overlap
BOS Cross curriculum content • ICT • Work, Employment and Enterprise • Aboriginal and Indigenous • Civics and Citizenship • Difference and Diversity • Environment • Gender • Key Competencies (there are 7…) • Literacy • Multicultural • Numeracy
Workshop activity 1 • Refer to the handout that summarisesBOSand MYP against the General Capabilities • Consider your own context • What could you add if you are in NSW? • Other jurisdictions? How much cross over for you? • Add comments in the blank boxes • …and the National Professional Standards for Teachers • Of what significance the National Professional Standards for Teachers?
Workshop Activity 2 • Handout includes 4 tasks • Overview sheet links tasks to the general capabilities • Activity: How might you use these tasks in your context?
The ‘natural home’ proposition Which of the General Capabilities find their natural home in Economics and Business Education?
Call for evidence – stake your claim! • The inclusion of Economics and Business curriculum in the Australian curriculum is evidence of national consensus about the entitlement of every student to quality learning in this curriculum area. • Economics and Business curriculum has a unique and powerful contribution to make to the realisation of the goals articulated in the Melbourne Declaration.
A proposition • Economics and Business education is a natural home for these general capabilities : • Critical and creative thinking – e.g.enterprise and entrepreneurship • Personal and social capability – e.g.consumer and financial literacy • Ethical behaviour – e.g. business conduct and the operation of governments
Challenges ahead • 1. Claiming the territory – different battles in different jurisdictions? • 2. Assessment and reporting (driving the curriculum?) • 3. Programming – to embed or extract? • 4. Opportunity cost of primacy of the capabilities?
Sources ACARA. (2012). Draft Shape of the Australian Curriculum: Economics and Business ACARA. (2012). General Capabilities in the Australian Curriculum Board of Studies NSW. (2003). Commerce Years 7-10 Syllabus Business Educators’ Australasia Inc (2008). Business Education in the Australian Curriculum Millar, S. (2007). How Role Play Addresses the Difficulties Students Perceive when Writing Reflectively about the Concepts They are Learning in Science. Unpublished M Ed (Hons) Thesis, University of Western Sydney Websites: http://www.ibo.org/myp/curriculum/interaction/ http://atc21s.org/ http://theconversation.edu.au/ http://www.mceecdya.edu.au/mceecdya/melbourne_declaration,25979.html