1 / 19

What are the Stakes?

What are the Stakes?. Office winning motivations Anthony Downs: ‘Parties formulate policies to elections, rather than win elections in order to formulate policies’ William Riker: Theory of coalitions – with office as a fixed prize No attempts (for a long time) to connect the two theories.

elkan
Download Presentation

What are the Stakes?

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. What are the Stakes? • Office winning motivations • Anthony Downs: ‘Parties formulate policies to elections, rather than win elections in order to formulate policies’ • William Riker: Theory of coalitions – with office as a fixed prize • No attempts (for a long time) to connect the two theories

  2. What are the Stakes? • Voters • Concerned with policy • Forward looking • Expectations about coalitions • Politicians • Do things while they are in office • At the least, pretend to have preferences over policy

  3. What are the Stakes? • De Swann: Candidates care foremost about policy. • Not an unproblematic view either • If politicians only care about policy, why do parties compete for office • Policy is ultimately made in the legislature.

  4. Office Motivation • Two views: • An end in itself • Means to influence policy • If an end in itself there is only one way to win: Get into office • If ‘being in’ is the only thing that matters why not grand coalitions? • The office as a fixed prize

  5. Office Motivation • If a fixed prize, coalition formation is a competitive process of dividing up the pie. • Exclusivity? • A bigger share? • Degrees of incumbency • Prime Ministership • Foreign Affairs, Finance (“Status Ministries”)

  6. Office Motivation • Spoils of office • Portfolios • Difference between systems • Non-ministerial appointments • Votes in cabinet • Admits policy concern • Patronage

  7. Policy Motivation • Parties motivated by the strength of their policy preference • For example, Communist parties inflexible, Christian Democrats not • Italy • PCI – Italian Communist Party • The historic compromise of the post-war period • Abandon ideas of socialist transformation of state in favor of more moderate policies

  8. Policy Motivation • Italy (cont.) • PRI trying to avoid isolation. • Office seeking elements? Or instrumental behavior? • Christian Democrats (DC) as office seekers • DC strategy involves painting the PRI as ‘fanatics’ – rules them out as coalition partners

  9. Policy Motivation • Lesson • Motivation? • Strategies • Extremes as fanatics • Center as opportunists • Policy motivation and the production of public goods • What about ‘the right’?

  10. Policy Dimensions • Policy Dimensions & Policy Space Christian Democrats CSP Conservatives X SDP Liberals Communists

  11. Policy Dimensions • Problems with measuring • Euclidean space • Policies may be discrete • How do we position parties in the policy space: • Country studies • Expert surveys • Multidimensional scaling of roll-calling votes • Policy programmes/Manifestos • Mass Surveys

  12. Achieving Policy Objectives • If parties are policy motivates we must consider importance of holding office • If in opposition a party can influence policy: • In parliament: Votes, amendments, delays, concessions • Ability to make or break government (if pivotal) • Committees and other institutions

  13. Achieving Policy Objectives • Index of oppositional influence • Number of standing committees • Whether committees shadow ministries • Committee positions • Committee chairs • Is government membership necessary? • Government departments implement policy & make many minor policy choices • Formulation of policy

  14. Office as a means to an end • Executive influence • Cabinet makes many key decisions • How do cabinets make decisions? • Majority Rule • Unanimity • The role of cabinet portfolios

  15. Office as a means to an end • Party Hierarchy & Motivation • Party members may have different motivations • Party leaders/elite tend to emphasize compromise and cabinet participation • Regular members may adhere more strictly to policy • E.g., U.K. Labour

  16. Office as a means to an end • Ireland’s Labour Party • Coalition with Fine Gael • Cuts in public spending • Labour: “What would have happened if..?” • Break-up of 1992-1997 coalition • Allows Labour to make the argument that their presence actually had a moderating influence

  17. Policy as a means to an end • Models of electoral competition have assumed office-seeking politicians • Coalition theories – policy considered important • Policy a vehicle to win elections • Politicians only concerned about policy to the extent that it helps them win elections

  18. Policy as a means to an end • A complete theory has to address both elections and coalition formation • Furthermore, we would also like to be able to say how past events influence future coalitions • When policy is instrumental, it is only important in terms of the opportunities a particular policy provides

  19. So….. • …what does winning mean? • Possibilities: • Office seekers using policy • Policy seekers needing to win office • Policy seekers not caring about office • The shadow of the future • ‘Winning’ is not simple idea • Usually the need to win office (for whatever reason) is emphasized

More Related