1 / 28

Authors: Vera Mann, Alex Eble , Chris Frost, Ramaswamy Premkumar , Peter Boone.

Retrospective comparative evaluation of the lasting impact of a community-based primary health care programme on under-5 mortality in villages around Jamkhed, India. Authors: Vera Mann, Alex Eble , Chris Frost, Ramaswamy Premkumar , Peter Boone.

elma
Download Presentation

Authors: Vera Mann, Alex Eble , Chris Frost, Ramaswamy Premkumar , Peter Boone.

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Retrospective comparative evaluation of the lasting impact of a community-based primary health care programme on under-5 mortality in villages around Jamkhed, India. Authors: Vera Mann, Alex Eble, Chris Frost, RamaswamyPremkumar, Peter Boone. Bulletin World Health Organization, 2010; 88: 727-736

  2. RATIONALE OF THE STUDY • In 2003, the Bellagio Child Survival Group reported that 10 million children were dying every year. • Thus brought to the forefront the issue of child survival in the global health care agenda. • The Bellagio series, The Alma Atta series and the Lancet series, all point out , most of these deaths are preventable. • In India and in many other developing countries, providing even basic health care to the rural masses is a challenge to the government.

  3. Community based primary health care provided by community residents improve child survival in areas with high child mortality. • The Warmi Project in Bolivia and the Society for Education, Action and Research in Community Health (SEARCH), India have demonstrated significant reductions in perinatal and neonatal mortality. • Such models of community-based primary health care are adopted by many aid agencies to address the lack of health care and improve child survival. • However, they rarely conduct rigorous evaluation of their work, as it may be expensive or carry the risk of showing negative results. • Consequently , few credible data are available on the impact of the ongoing work.

  4. THE COMPREHENSIVE RURAL HEALTH PROJECT • The Comprehensive Rural Health Project (CRHP) is a long term community-based health care project. • Working for the past 40 years. • It is one of the inspirations for the 1978 International Conference on Primary Health Care at Alma Atta. • CRHP was founded in 1970 by physicians Mabelle and RajnikantArole. • They envisioned a system that delivered both curative and preventive care to India’s most vulnerable people.

  5. Based in the town of Jamkhed, CRHP serves in and surrounding areas in this part of central Maharashtra. • It currently covers approximately 300 communities with a population of over 500000 people. • Activities in the project villages are carried out at three tier levels: village health workers, mobile health teams and the secondary care hospital in Jamkhed. • The village health workers disseminate health knowledge on issues such as care seeking, family planning, adequate birth spacing, nutrition, hygiene, sanitation and safe drinking water.

  6. LEARNING OBJECTIVE • Learning objective from this article would be: • To understand the causes of neonatal mortality in developing countries like India and role of primary health care in their management.

  7. RESEARCH AIMS • Primary aim was to compare mortality among children under 5 in CRHP villages of a typical size and in nearby control villages of similar size. • Secondary aims were to compare sanitation; health knowledge; number of children per women; place and type of delivery; type of birth attendant; indicators of antenatal, delivery and postnatal care; and child morbidity.

  8. METHODOLOGY • STUDY DESIGN: For statistical efficiency, equal number of villages in CRHP and control sites were sampled and approximately equal number of households , women and children were sampled in each village. • SURVEYS: Two surveys were conducted. A household survey collected information on household level indicators like wealth, sanitation and water supply. Women were interviewed in the surveyed household and a full birth history obtained (woman’s background, history of pregnancy related care, health expenditure, morbidity of under 5 children).

  9. SAMPLING CRHP VILLAGES • CRHP worked in 4 administrative blocks. • 3 in the core area near the hospital Jamkhed (Jamkhed, Ashti, Karjat) and one Akole, approximately 220 kms from the core area. • Akole –excluded from the present study, due to different population characteristics. • Villages with a population between 400 to 3000 where a CRHP village health worker was working for at least 5 years were selected for study. • Of the 153 villages under CRHP activities, 75 villages satisfied all the criteria and were included in the study.

  10. SAMPLING CONTROL VILLAGES • Control villages were selected with characteristics similar to CRHP villages. • To minimize the risk of contamination bias, a buffer zone was drawn around the three core blocks. • An elliptical buffer line was drawn , that was never less than 5 kms from any intervention village. • A second ellipse with same foci was drawn at 25 kms outside the first. Control villages were selected from the area between the two ellipses. • From the 135 non-tribal villages in the area with population between 400 to 3000, 75 were selected at random.

  11. FIG 1. MAP OF CONTROL AND INTERVENTION AREAS IN RETROSPECTIVE STUDY OF THE IMPACT OF THE COMPREHENSIVE RURAL HEALTH PROJECT (CRHP), MAHARASHTRA STATE , INDIA

  12. SAMPLING HOUSEHOLDS AND WOMEN • In each village, 30 households were randomly selected, from the mapping list. • An additional 60 households were selected as backups. • All potentially eligible women in the selected 30 households were interviewed, with subject to availability. • If however, it was impossible to identify and interview at least one eligible woman after 2 visits, the next household on the backup list was approached.

  13. ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA • Women were eligible : • if they were between 15 to 59 years of age. • were currently or previously married. • had lived in the village for at least one year before the survey, and • had at least one child born alive in the village in the past 15 years. • To minimize recall bias, only women who had given birth to a live born child between 1st September 1992 to 31st December 2007 in the same village where interviewed, were included.

  14. SAMPLE SIZE • Sample size was calculated to attain 80% statistical power to detect a 25% reduction in under 5 mortality at 5% significance level using a conventional 2-sided test • Based on NFHS data 1998-1999 for rural India, a 10% under 5 mortality rate was assumed for the control villages and hence 7.5% under 5 mortality in the CRHP villages • An intra-cluster correlation coefficient of 0.0175 was taken. • With these assumptions 54 eligible births were required from each of the 75 sampled villages. • Also with an assumed average of two eligible births per household, at least 27 households per village were required.

  15. DATA ANALYSIS • Demographic and other characteristics at the village, household and mother level were summarized by type of village (CRHP or control). • The percentages of villages with irrigation in the CRHP and control groups were compared using the Fisher’s Exact test. • Mean ages and health knowledge scores were compared using linear regression models with robust standard errors. • Categorical characteristics and secondary outcomes at household, women and child level were compared using logistic regression models. • Village specific crude neonatal , infant and under 5 mortality were estimated by the Kaplan- Meier method and are presented separately for control and CRHP villages. • Cox regression models were used to compare hazard rates between CRHP and control villages .

  16. TABLE 1. STUDY POPULATION DATA FROM A RETROSPECTIVE EVALUATION OF THE IMPACT OF THE COMPREHENSIVE RURAL HEALTH PROJECT (CRHP), MAHARASHTRA STATE, INDIA, SEPTEMBER1992-DECEMBER 2007 .

  17. TABLE 2. CHARACTERISTICS OF CONTROL AND INTERVENTION VILLAGES , HOUSEHOLDS AND MOTHERS IN A RETROSPECTIVE EVALUATION OF THE IMPACT OF THE COMPREHENSIVE RURAL HEALTH PROJECT (CRHP), MAHARASHTRA STATE, INDIA, 2007.

  18. TABLE 3.SECONDARY OUTCOMES FOR INTERVENTION AND CONTROL VILLAGES AT THE HOUSEHOLD, MOTHER AND CHILD LEVEL IN RETROSPECTIVE EVALUATION OF THE IMPACT OF THE COMPREHENSIVE RURAL HEALTH PROJECT (CRHP), MAHARASHTRA STATE, INDIA.

  19. TABLE 3.SECONDARY OUTCOMES FOR INTERVENTION AND CONTROL VILLAGES AT THE HOUSEHOLD, MOTHER AND CHILD LEVEL IN RETROSPECTIVE EVALUATION OF THE IMPACT OF THE COMPREHENSIVE RURAL HEALTH PROJECT (CRHP), MAHARASHTRA STATE, INDIA.

  20. TABLE 4. AGE-SPECIFIC CHILD MORTALITY RATES, BY 5-YEARLY PERIODS OF BIRTH, FOR THE ENTIRE STUDY AREA COVERED IN RETROSPECTIVE EVALUATION OF THE IMPACT OF THE COMPREHENSIVE RURAL HEALTH PROJECT, MAHARASHTRA STATE, INDIA, SEPTEMBER 1992-DECEMBER 2007.

  21. FIG 2. KAPLAN- MEIER ESTIMATES OF AGE-SPECIFIC CHILDHOOD MORTALITY IN CONTROL AND INTERVENTION VILLAGES IN RETROSPECTIVE EVALUATION OF THE IMPACT OF THE COMPREHENSIVE RURAL HEALTH PROJECT (CRHP), MAHARASHTRA STATE , INDIA, SEPTEMBER 1992- DECEMBER 2007.

  22. TABLE 5. AGE-SPECIFIC CHILD MORTALITY RATES IN INTERVENTION AND CONTROL VILLAGES FOR THE 15 YEARS PRECEDING THE SURVEY TO EVALUATE THE IMPACT OF THE COMPREHENSIVE RURAL HEALTH PROJECT(CRHP), MAHARASHTRA STATE, INDIA, SEPTEMBER 1992- DECEMBER2007.

  23. TABLE 6. ESTIMATED EFFECT OF THE COMPREHENSIVE RURAL HEALTH PROJECT (CRPH) ON UNDER 5 MORTALITY, MAHARASHTRA STATE, INDIA, SEPTEMBER 1992- DECEMBER 2007.

  24. SUMMARIZING RESULTS • More women in the CRHP villages belonged to less-advantaged castes, their families were less likely to own land and were less likely to have irrigation available. • From Table 3, we could see that more people in the CHRP villages had toilet facilities and treated drinking water. • Women in the intervention villages received a health knowledge score that was on an average 0.15 standard deviations higher than that obtained by the control villages. • In the control villages 42.3% of the women had no education at all as compared to the 39.3% of women in CRHP villages.

  25. Out of 10896 eligible live births to 4940 eligible women during the study period, 619 under 5 child deaths were reported. • Of those 37 in control villages and 48 in the intervention villages were reported on the day of birth. • Overall the hazard of death in CRHP villages was reduced by 10% for the period from birth to 5 years of age, when data was controlled for irrigation status and the caste and religion of mother.

  26. CONCLUSION • In the evaluation of the effect of CRHP on childhod mortality over the study period it was found that there was a 30% reduction in the hazard of child death after the neonatal period in the CRHP villages as compared to the control villages. • This reduction was significant at the 5% level. • However, similar reduction was not found in hazard of neonatal death.

  27. DISCUSSION • There was a difference in the reduction of hazard of death in childhood after neonatal period and in the neonatal period itself. • Causes of neonatal deaths( primarily birth asphyxia, preterm birth and neonatal sepsis) in India are different than in later period (primarily pneumonia, diarrhoea and malaria) • WHO recommended first-line treatments for pneumonia, diarrhoea and malaria can be administered in the community. • There may have also been differential reporting of live and still births.

  28. STRENGTH AND LIMITATIONS OF THE STUDY. • STRENGTH: • The main strength of this study was that it used very carefully selected evidence to date that hazard of child death was lower in CRHP villages versus the control, non-intervention villages. • LIMITATIONS: • Reported mortality may have been impacted by migration. • Also despite careful selection of controls, women in the CRHP villages might have answered certain questions differently, because of their improved knowledge.

More Related