310 likes | 517 Views
CO 2 capture with sodium carbonate. Hanna Knuutila and Hallvard F. Svendsen Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU) Trondheim, NORWAY. Outline. Introduction Modeling Case study: Power plants with sodium carbonate based CO 2 capture prosess Experimental work VLE
E N D
CO2 capture with sodium carbonate Hanna Knuutila and Hallvard F. Svendsen Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU) Trondheim, NORWAY
Outline • Introduction • Modeling • Case study: Power plants with sodium carbonate based CO2 capture prosess • Experimental work • VLE • Test with Pilot-plant • Kinetic • Solubility • Conclusions • Future work
Introduction • Why carbonate chemicals? • Environmentally friendly chemicals • Potentially low energy consumption • Already used in power plants for SOx removal • Why slurry systems? • High concentrations of carbonate • Minimization of energy consumption • Possibility to improve the absorption process
Case study: Power plants with sodium carbonate based CO2 capture
CO2 capture plant • Chemical absorption plant with sodium carbonate • Limited solubility of both carbonate and bicarbonate the system works in slurry phase • Modeling (ChemCAD) • Kinetics not taken into account • Equilibrium between inlet gas and outlet liquid is assumed to be obtained at the bottom of the absorber • Only solid phases taken into account are sodium carbonate and sodium bicarbonate
Power plants Condensing power plant (CP) Combined heat and power plant (CHP)
Power plants • CO2 removal efficiency is 90 % • Steam of 5 Bar was used as heat source for the CO2 stripper • Condensate returning to the power plant from the stripper was preheated and fed to the feed water tank. • “Waste heat” from the CO2 capture plant was used in the power plant to preheat the feed water or/and produce district heat • Sea water was assumed to be available for cooling
Results • The absorption was nearly isothermal • The absorption rate was low • There was a strong dependency on temperature for CO2 absorption • the absolute difference in absorption rates was quite small due to the small absorption rate in the beginning. • Operationally the sodium carbonate-bicarbonate system behaved very well
Conclusions • The behavior of carbonate systems is very different to amine systems • The problems with carbonate systems are different compared to amines • There is potential in the carbonate based systems but new processes are needed to make them competitive with amine systems
Future work • Experimental • Screening tests with slurry based systems • VLSE measurements with promoted and non-promoted carbonate systems • Modeling • VLSE models for slurry systems • Modeling of the CO2 capture plant using results of lab scale pilot plant