1 / 15

Draft CAEP Standards

Draft CAEP Standards. AACTE Annual Convention Council of Academic Deans from Research Education Institutions Rosen Shingle Creek Hotel. Commission Structure and Working Groups. 4 Leverage Points in the Commission’s Standards. Build partnerships and strong clinical experiences

elmo
Download Presentation

Draft CAEP Standards

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Draft CAEP Standards AACTE Annual Convention Council of Academic Deans from ResearchEducation Institutions Rosen Shingle Creek Hotel

  2. Commission Structureand Working Groups

  3. 4 Leverage Points in the Commission’s Standards • Build partnerships and strong clinical experiences • Raise and assure educator-candidate quality • Include all providers • Preparation judged by outcomes and impact on P-12 student learning

  4. Standards Timeline • Public feedback through March 29, 2013 • Commission revises and approves standards by mid-June 2013 • CAEP Board of Directors reviews and adopts standards in summer 2013 • Standards and supplemental materials developed through fall 2013 • Standards released in January 2014

  5. Rationale • Role of research in the development of the standards • Focus on evidence

  6. Examples of Evidence • Familiar to any accredited provider • Familiar forms applied more rigorously • Emergence of additional measures or new assessments • Measures new to accreditation

  7. Standard 1: Content and Pedagogical Knowledge The provider ensures that candidates develop a deep understanding of the critical concepts and principles of their discipline and, by completion, are able to use discipline-specific practices flexibly to advance the learning of all students toward attainment of college and career-readiness expectations.

  8. Standard 2: Clinical Partnerships and Practice The provider ensures that effective partnerships and high-quality clinical practice are central to preparation so that candidates develop the knowledge, skills, and dispositions necessary to demonstrate positive impact on all P-12 students’ learning.

  9. Standard 3: Candidate Quality, Recruitment, and Selectivity The provider demonstrates that the quality of candidates is a continuing and purposeful part of its responsibility from recruitment, at admission, through the progression of courses and clinical experiences, and to decisions that completers are prepared to teach effectively and are recommended for certification.

  10. Standard 4: Program Impact The provider demonstrates the impact of its completers on P-12 student learning, classroom instruction and schools, and the satisfaction of its completers with the relevance and effectiveness of their preparation.

  11. Standard 5: Provider Quality, Continuous Improvement, and Capacity The provider maintains a quality assurance system comprised of data from multiple measures, including evidence of candidates’ and completers’ positive impact on P-12 student learning and development. The provider supports continuous improvement that is sustained, evidence-based, and that evaluates the effectiveness of its completers. The provider uses the results of inquiry and data collection to establish priorities, enhance program elements and capacity, and test innovations to improve completers’ impact on P-12 student learning.

  12. Recommendations: Annual Reporting on Program Impact The Commission recommends that CAEP gather the following data and monitor them annually from all providers on measures of program impact: • Impact on P-12 learning • Indicators of teaching effectiveness • Results of employer surveys, and including retention and employment milestones • Results of completer surveys

  13. RecommendationAnnual Reporting on Program Outcomes • Graduation rates • Ability of completers to meet licensing (certification) and any additional state requirements • Ability of completers to be hired in education positions for which they prepared • Student loan default rates

  14. RecommendationLevels of Accreditation The Commission recommends that CAEP accreditation be based on a judgment that the provider’s accreditation evidence meets a designated “threshold” classification that CAEP establishes for each of the five standards recommended by the Commission. In addition, the Commission recommends that all components for standard 4 on Program Impact and components 5.4 and 5.5 on continuous improvement must reach the “pass” classification for the provider to be accredited.

  15. Microsite for individual feedback and commentary: http://standards.caepnet.org

More Related