1 / 4

FBRMPO SPOT 3 Bike Ped Projects Draft Prioritization Methodology

FBRMPO SPOT 3 Bike Ped Projects Draft Prioritization Methodology. October 31, 2013 FBRMPO Prioritization Subcommittee. SPOT 3.0 FBRMPO Bike Ped Prioritization Methodology. Two Initial Factors

eman
Download Presentation

FBRMPO SPOT 3 Bike Ped Projects Draft Prioritization Methodology

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. FBRMPO SPOT 3 Bike Ped Projects Draft Prioritization Methodology October 31, 2013 FBRMPO Prioritization Subcommittee

  2. SPOT 3.0 FBRMPO Bike Ped Prioritization Methodology Two Initial Factors • Each jurisdiction has to indicate top three pedestrian and top three bicycle projects, • NCDOT score that will be received will account for 50% of the total weight in prioritizing the projects for top 5 ranking

  3. SPOT 3.0 Bike Ped-FBRMPO Additional 6 Factors same as in SPOT 2.0: • There should be at least one bicycle and one pedestrian project per county, including all municipalities in that county (20 points if only project in category, new: 10 points if one of two projects) • Connectivity (to trip generators): up to 10 5points, 1 point for each connection to fixed route transit, school (K-12 and college/university), Central Business District; multi-family residential complex, park, employment center, points of interest • Connection to/completion of existing bike ped network (510 points max, 1 point for each connection) • Support from a local bike/ped group or additional support from the Complete Streets Subcommittee (10 5ptsmax) • In existing plan (10 5points if in a local bike/ped plan; 5 3 points if in the local Comprehensive Plan, or FBRMPO CTP/LRTP but not in dedicated bike ped plan; 1 point if on PNL) • Crashes on corridor (10 5pts max if three crashes or one death during 2006-2010; 5 pts if two crashes)

  4. Complete Streets recommendation for SPOT 3.0 Bike Ped Prioritization Methodology • Include SPOT 2.0 Methodology factors except NCDOT SPOT Score (Score points re-calibrated to make it add up to 100 • Add factors for social equity and public health: • Social Equity Index combined score based on population 65 plus, minority, low income, zero vehicle households and Low English Proficiency population (20 points if above county median on all five) • Public Health score based on data compiled by the Community Transformation Grant: incidence of heart disease and incidence of lung cancer (10 points if above county median on both) • Question about population <16

More Related