1.39k likes | 1.4k Views
Explore refractivity observations by radar during IHOP 2002 to analyze moisture dynamics and boundary effects. Learn about surface moisture patterns, wind influences, and practical implications.
E N D
Highlights of Refractivity Observations by Radar (and Some More) during IHOP_2002 Frédéric Fabry and ShinJu Park McGill University Montréal, Canada
A Few Definitions IHOP_2002: International H2O Project. Its goal: Determine how much does knowing 4-D H2O distribution help in QPF. Refractivity (N): A quantity related to the index of refraction (n) of air: N = 106(n−1) = 77.6 P/T + 373000 e/T2. Surface N can be measured by radar up to a range of about 50 km using ground targets. Since over that range, P and T are (fairly) uniform, N can be used to infer e and Td.
IHOP: Ground Targets at S-Pol Liberal KS OK Early fears that ground targets would be in short supply in the Panhandle were unfounded, thanks to unburied power/phone lines, farms, elevators… Hooker Beaver Beaver R. valley Homestead OK TX Booker Perryton
Rapid moistening Storm Outflow Wet Real-Time/Default Display 60 Diurnal cycle (mostly) Dry Wet
Example: Surface Moistening, 25 May Sunny, cool, calm morning; will warm quickly Anomalous propagation echoes Previous rain No wind (!) Maximizes local effects
Example: Surface Moistening, 25 May Previous rain
Example: Surface Moistening, 25 May Previous rain
Example: Surface Moistening, 25 May Previous rain
Example: Surface Moistening, 25 May Previous rain
Example: Surface Moistening, 25 May Previous rain
Example: Surface Moistening, 25 May Previous rain
Example: Surface Moistening, 25 May Previous rain
Example: Surface Moistening, 25 May Previous rain
Example: Surface Moistening, 25 May Previous rain
Example: Surface Moistening, 25 May Previous rain
Example: Surface Moistening, 25 May Previous rain
(g m-2 s-1) 360 W 120 W Flux computed thanks to a lot of crude assumptions (too high contrast expected) Example: Surface Moistening, 25 May Previous rain
Example: Surface Moistening, 25 May Previous rain Note how “fragile” the moisture patch was under light winds
Contrasting Example: 29 May 72 hrs later, on a sunny day prior to 29 May No wind again. Maximizes local effects Some weak differential moistening
Contrasting Example: 29 May East winds building up
Contrasting Example: 29 May East winds building up
Contrasting Example: 29 May East winds building up
Moisture boundary Contrasting Example: 29 May East winds building up
Moisture boundary Contrasting Example: 29 May
Moisture boundary Contrasting Example: 29 May
Moisture boundary Contrasting Example: 29 May
Moisture boundaries Contrasting Example: 29 May Winds shift to SE behind 2nd boundary
Moisture boundaries Contrasting Example: 29 May Winds shift to SE behind 2nd boundary
Moisture boundaries Contrasting Example: 29 May Winds shift to SE behind 2nd boundary
Moisture boundaries Contrasting Example: 29 May Winds shift to SE behind 2nd boundary