150 likes | 363 Views
Midwest ISO Discussion. February 5, 2009 Greg Levesque Manager – Regional Relations & Policy. Agenda. MISO Overview Resource Adequacy Ancillary Services Market Demand Response MISO Expansion Interconnection Queue Reform Current Issues List of Acronyms. t. MISO Overview.
E N D
Midwest ISO Discussion February 5, 2009 Greg Levesque Manager – Regional Relations & Policy
Agenda • MISO Overview • Resource Adequacy • Ancillary Services Market • Demand Response • MISO Expansion • Interconnection Queue Reform • Current Issues • List of Acronyms
MISO Overview • Voluntary Organization • 15 States and Manitoba • 700+ Employees • 300+ Market Participants • Offices in Carmel, IN & St. Paul, MN • ATC is a Transmission Owner Member • ATC is a signatory to Transmission Owners Agreement (TOA)
Resource Adequacy • MISO Module E • LSEs are required to maintain access to sufficient “planning resources,” including generation and demand response • MISO will annually establish a Planning Reserve Margin for each LSE based on a Loss of Load Expectation study, but states have the right to establish Planning Reserve Margins that are either higher or lower than what MISO would set • LSEs would need to show on a monthly basis that they have sufficient resources to meet their forecasted load and the Planning Reserve Margin • A voluntary capacity auction would be held prior to the start of each month to allow LSEs to acquire any additional needed capacity • MISO would assess a financial charge to LSEs that are deficient in meeting their resource adequacy requirements • Poised to begin in 2009 but some issues are still before FERC
Ancillary Services Market • Began operations on January 6, 2009 • MISO became Balancing Authority (BA) • Former BAs become Local Balancing Authorities • Provides market for: • Spinning Reserves • Supplemental Reserves (non-spinning) • Demand Response Resources • Load that can be curtailed or interrupted • Behind-the-meter generation facilities • No major issues reported in first month of operations
Demand Response • A recent study indicated that 70% of demand response resources can be deployed by an LSE for economic reasons • MISO currently is developing new concepts to implement demand response in its footprint and has proposed significant changes in their tariff to reflect these new concepts • MISO is being urged to: • Incorporate existing LSE interruptible and other demand response programs into the market • Develop market rules that prevent gaming of system • NOT interfere or develop its own retail programs or try to replace agreements LSE already have in place with their respective state commissions
MISO Expansion • Western Expansion Proposal (Module F) • MISO/MAPP seams operating agreement expired January 2008 • Proposal would allow transmission owning entities to join MISO without signing Transmission Owners Agreement • Module F companies would not be subject to the provisions of the MISO MTEP (planning) process or the MISO RECB (cost-sharing) process • Several entities including MidAm Basin and WAPA have shown interest • Concerns raised include and uneven playing field for transmission owners (TOs) and the ability of current TOs to leave and return under Module F • Matter currently is before FERC
MISO Expansion • Duquesne Light Company and Aquila • Both entities were seeking to become members of MISO • Duquesne chose to stay in PJM due to resolution of its issues related to capacity costs • MISO is pursuing exit fees of $7.5 million from Duquesne • Aquila was in the process of joining MISO under terms of a merger but it was directed by the Missouri PSC to join SPP due to cost savings and more interconnections within the SPP footprint • MISO and Aquila have agreed on a $1.5 million settlement
Interconnection Queue Reform • FERC Technical Conference in December 2007 • RTOs directed to address queue congestion issues • MISO had a theoretical queue backlog of almost 50 years • MISO implemented queue reform which: • Replaced “first-come, first-served” approach with a “first-ready, first-served” approach • Replaced the tariff feasibility study • Allowed three pathways through the study process: • Study-only • Current tariff study process • Fast path for requests that meet customer and system readiness criteria • Introduced cost and other requirements for suspension of study process • MISO has reported that the stiffer requirements have caused many questionable generation interconnection requests to be withdrawn
Regionally Planned Generator Interconnection Projects (RPGIP) • Regionally Planned Generator Interconnection Projects • Goal:To optimize transmission investment by planning transmission on a regional rather than a one-off basis • RPGIPs would be constructed to interconnect numerous generators (likely renewable/wind) and would require generators to obtain subscriptions for capacity on the line • MISO plans to develop tariff language during the next few months and will file the proposal with FERC • Questions remain related to cost allocation
Current Issues • Wind Integration • Operational Issues • Cost Allocation • OMS RECB Effort • Upper Midwest Transmission Development Initiative • RGOS Study • FERC Order 719 • RTO (MISO) Governance and Stakeholder Openness • New MISO CEO • John Bear
List of Acronyms • OMS – Organization of MISO States • RECB – Regional Expansion Criteria Benefits. • LSE – Load Serving Entity • FERC – Federal Energy Regulatory Commission • UMTDI – Upper Midwest Transmission Development Initiative • RGOS – Regional Generator Outlet Study • RTO – Regional Transmission Organization • RPGIP – Regionally Planned Generator Interconnection Projects • PJM – PJM Interconnection (RTO)