120 likes | 391 Views
1. Comanche Peak Units 1
E N D
1. Comanche Peak Nuclear Power PlantExisting and Proposed UnitsGranbury/Hood CountyEconomic Development CorporationSeptember 15, 2010
2. Comanche Peak Units 1 & 2
3. Units 1 & 2 Local Impacts
4. The Houston Chronicle reported a few weeks ago that recent U.S. Census estimates show that Texas added more residents than any other state in the year ending July 1.
Our state now has 478,000 more people than it did a year ago roughly the equivalent of packing up all of Fresno, Calif., and moving it here.
Fresno unemployment rate: nearly 16 percent.
The Houston Chronicle reported a few weeks ago that recent U.S. Census estimates show that Texas added more residents than any other state in the year ending July 1.
Our state now has 478,000 more people than it did a year ago roughly the equivalent of packing up all of Fresno, Calif., and moving it here.
Fresno unemployment rate: nearly 16 percent.
5. Texans are using more electricity
Just in August Texas saw four new summer peak electric demands - some 2.5 percent over what was estimated.
Texans are using more electricity
Just in August Texas saw four new summer peak electric demands - some 2.5 percent over what was estimated.
6. 5 Overview of Proposed Expansion (Units 3 & 4) 1700 MW each unit; 3400 MW total
Uses existing Comanche Peak site and infrastructure
Comanche Peak Nuclear Power Company Joint venture between Luminant and Mitsubishi Heavy Industries
Attractive, emissions-free growth opportunity
7. 6 Benefits of Potential Expansion
8. Future Economic Benefits of Proposed Expansion (Perryman Group)
9. 8 Project Milestones
10. Potential Water Use Modeling Overview Water modeling is a snapshot of an ongoing process
Water modeling data 15 months ago was different just as we expect data to be further refined 15 months from now.
Simulates full use of every Brazos Basin water right over 50-60 years: 100% use has never occurred.
Uses hottest months: Uses the hottest three months of the year and applies them for the entire year taking no benefit for cooler temperatures and lower water consumption.
Does not include lake level management: We have not considered any lake level management practices from the Brazos River Authority practices that are being studied in fall, 2010.
Does not include ongoing Luminant studies: The impacts do not consider Luminants ongoing efforts to potentially reduce water consumption.
11. Results 103,000 acre-feet for proposed Units 3 & 4
Requires new purchased water from upstream of Lake Granbury
Not just a case of using lake water with no additional sources
60 percent evaporates
Using EPAs best available cooling technology
40 percent returned to Lake Granbury
Luminant chose returning water to Lake Granbury to minimize lake level impacts
HDR (consulting firm) provided independent confirmation of model and results
Nuclear Regulatory Commissions Draft Environmental Impact Statement confirms no additional measures are needed
12. 11 High-End Estimates of Potential Water Use
13. Our company, employees and team members will continue to invest in this area
Significant employee presence
Ongoing investment in Lake Granbury
Luminant is continuing work to minimize the impact of proposed new units on Lake Granbury
Existing and future units rely on Lake Granbury
We will keep you informed
www.ExpandComanchePeak.com