1 / 21

Progressing a Standard as an ITU-T Recommendation

Progressing a Standard as an ITU-T Recommendation Georges Sebek (ITU/TSB) Counsellor, ITU-T SG 17 Telecommunication Standardization bureau Outline ITU structure Collaboration with other standardization organizations Progressing SAML and XACML as ITU-T Recommendations Conclusion

emily
Download Presentation

Progressing a Standard as an ITU-T Recommendation

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Progressing a Standard as an ITU-T Recommendation Georges Sebek (ITU/TSB) Counsellor, ITU-T SG 17Telecommunication Standardization bureau

  2. Outline • ITU structure • Collaboration with other standardization organizations • Progressing SAML and XACML as ITU-T Recommendations • Conclusion

  3. 1- ITU structure

  4. ITUstructure Plenipotentiary Conference 1.1 ITU Council ITU-D World Telecommunication Development Conference ITU-T World Telecommunication Standardization Assembly ITU-R World Radiocommunication Conference Radiocommunication Assembly General Secretariat ITU-T: unique worldwide venue for industry and government to work together to foster the development and use of interoperable, non-discriminatory and demand-driven international standards ITU-R: use of the radio frequency spectrum by all radiocommunication services, develop Recommendations on radiocommunication matters ITU-D: promoter and catalyst for telecommunication / ICT development and the bridge between relevant partners involved in ICTs, especially in developing and least developed countries General Secretariat: provides services to the membership, coordinates the activities of the Sectors in undertaking intersectoral activities and supports the activities of the Sectors

  5. ITU-T structure WORLD TELECOMMUNICATION 1.2 STANDARDIZATION ASSEMBLY WTSA TELECOMMUNICATION STANDARDIZATION TSAG ADVISORY GROUP STUDY GROUP STUDY GROUP STUDY GROUP SG WORKING WORKING WORKING PARTY PARTY PARTY WP Focus Groups NGN-GSI Q Q Q Q Q = Question JCAs (N-ID…)

  6. ITU-T Study Groups 1.3 • SG 2: Operational aspects of service provision, networks and performance • SG 3: Tariff and accounting principles including related telecommunication economic and policy issues • SG 4: Telecommunication management • SG 5: Protection against electromagnetic environment effects • SG 6: Outside plant and related indoor installations • SG 9: Integrated broadband cable networks and television and sound transmission • SG 11: Signaling requirements and protocols • SG 12: Performance and quality of service • SG 13: Next generation networks • SG 15: Optical and other transport networks • SG 16: Multimedia services, systems and terminals • SG 17: Security, languages and telecommunication software* • SG 19: Mobile telecommunications networks *SG17 is the Lead Study Group on telecommunication security

  7. WP 2/17 Security Questions Telecom Systems Users Q8/17 Telebiometrics *Multimodal modelFwk *System mechanism *Protection procedure *X.1081 1.4 TelecomSystems Q9/17 Q7/17 Q5/17 Secure communication services *Mobile secure communications *Home network security *Securityweb services *X.1121, X.1122, X.1141, X.1142 Securitymanagement *ISM guideline for telecom *Incident management *Risk assessment methodology *etc… *X.1051 Securityarchitectureand framework *Architecture, model, concepts, frameworks,*etc… *X.800 series*X.805 Cyber security*Overview of cyber-security*Vulnerability information sharing* Incident handling operations Q6/17 Q17/17 Countering spamby technical means *Technical anti-spam measures Q4/17 Communications system security*Vision, Coordination, Roadmap, Compendia…

  8. 2 – Collaboration with other standardization organizations

  9. Background 2.1 • ITU’s Constitution/Convention asks that ITU-T cooperate “with other world and regional intergovernmental organizations, and those non-governmental organizations concerned with telecommunications". • ITU-T has a wealth of instruments in place to collaborate with others

  10. ITU-T Rec. A.4: Communication process between ITU-T and Forums and Consortia 2.2 • Goal: to facilitate documentation exchange • Criteria: pretty straightforward and common sense • Evident ones: subject area should be of relevance to the work done in ITU-T • Documents submitted to ITU-T should not contain proprietary information (no restriction for distribution) • Forum membership should not preclude ITU MS or SM • Patent policy: must be consistent with ITU-T patent policy • A formal communication process can initiated either by the forum or by ITU-T (e.g., Study Group or Director of TSB) • Can be initiated at any time

  11. ITU-T Rec. A.5: Generic procedures for including references to documents of other organizations in ITU-T Recommendations 2.3 • Rules for referencing standards from other “qualified” organizations (with the exception of ISO and IEC) • Apply to those standards used as normative references (integral part of the Recommendations) • The normative references from qualified organizations need to be justified (status of approval, rational for the referencing, degree of stability, IPR isues,…) • Instead of referencing, it may be decided (by the SG) to incorporate the text of another organization into the text of a Recommendation (in part or in full) with th e permission of the organization

  12. ITU-T Rec. A.6: Cooperation and exchange of information between ITU-T and national and regional standards development organizations 2.4 • Similar in spirit to A.4 • Global Standards Collaboration (GSC): exchange information between participating standards organizations to facilitate collaboration and enhance the process of global telecommunication standardization in the ITU • Annual meetings of 9 leading national and regional standards organizations and ITU (ACIF, ARIB, ATIS, CCSA, ETSI, ISACC, TIA, TTA, TTC, ITU)(15 Observers at GSC-11: ANSI, CEPT, CITEL, GSMA, IEEE, IETF, OMA, SCTE,…)

  13. ITU-T Rec. A.7: Focus Groups: Working methods and procedures 2.5 • Focus Groups are an instrument providing an additional working environment for the quick development of standards in specific areas • Focus Groups have freedom to organize and finance themselves. Focus Groups can be created very quickly, are usually short-lived and can choose their own working methods, leadership, financing, and types of deliverables • Focus Groups report to a parent Study Group • The Focus Group deliverables may be further progressed as ITU-T Recommendations • The establishment of a Focus Group can be considered to start work in new areas with joint membership (ITU-T / SDO) participation in the development of specifications • The establishment of a Focus Group is an option considered for resolving any technical divergence between ITU-T and OASIS when updating X.1141 (SAML 2.0) and XACML (2.0)

  14. 3 – Progressing SAML and XACML as ITU-T Recommendations

  15. Submission 3.1

  16. Editing and consent 3.2

  17. Approval (AAP track) Recommendation Approved 3.3 Draft Recommendation input 3 weeks Comment Resolution AR yes Comments Received? SG/WP Meeting no LC Consent 4 weeks

  18. Summary on issues 3.4 • OASIS is qualified under ITU-T A.4 & A.5 • ITU-T SG 17 agreed to convert SAML and XACML instead of a simple referencing • Editing necessary (multipart standard / 1-Part Rec., normative/informative references) • IPR • Ongoing maintenance • PR

  19. Ongoing maintenance 3.5 • Maintain the communication channel with OASIS • OASIS plans further revisions of SAML and XACML that will be resubmitted to ITU-T • Sharing of defect reports and proposals for improvements • Appointment of liaison officers • Relevant OASIS TCs will continue to collect and respond to change proposals • In case of substantial different conclusions about some technical issues, a Focus Group may be established for harmonization and resolution of divergent conclusions

  20. Conclusion 4. • Well established collaboration between ITU-T and OASIS • MoU on E-business (with ISO, IEC and UN/ECE) • Joint Workshop on Public Warning, Geneva, 19-20 October 2006 (started during WSIS, Phase II, Tunis, November 2005) • OASIS standards accepted as ITU-T Recommendations(13 June 2006): X.1141 (SAML 2.0) and X.1142 (XACML 2.0) • Future cooperation areas: • OASIS Common Alerting Protocol (CAP) standard to be progressed as an ITU-T Recommendation • Accepted as work item at Rapporteur Meeting in September 2006 • Expect formal work item adoption in December 2006  X.CAP, consent foreseen by September 2007 • Web Services Security: SOAP Message Security (WSS v1.1) • Other cooperation mechanisms could be explored: workshops, Focus Groups, etc

  21. Further information at http://www.itu.int/ITU-T ITU-T SG 17 http://itu.int/ITU-T/studygroups/com17 Secretariat: tsbsg17@itu.int ITU/TSB contact with OASIS Simao Campos, simao.campos@itu.int Thank you

More Related