240 likes | 451 Views
Presentation Purpose. Trace historical trends in developmental disabilitiesAnalyze the present situationPredict likely developmentsSee how providers will have to change, what they will look like if they want to thrive and support people well. 150 Years of Institutionalization in the U.S.. History.
E N D
1. Provider of the Future Jim Conroy
Center for Outcome Analysis
www.eoutcome.org
3. 150 Years of Institutionalization in the U.S.
4. History Family and local responsibility
State aid – institutions
Medical model/domination
Kennedy CMH Act and concern
Scandals in institutions (Willowbrook, etc.)
Federal aid – Medicaid to institutions
1971
5. Behaviorism
Deinstitutionalization (graph)
Public education – PL 94-142, now IDEA
Professional model/domination Interdisciplinary – the “Ps”
Growth of community provider system History, 1970s
6. Medicaid use by states in communities (!)
1981 the ICF/MR (Small) program (little institutions 4 to 15) – interpretive guidelines
1981‘Waiver’ program created – Katie Beckett & Reagan
Eventually brought huge $ - but set the framework for decades as a medically-oriented “provider payment system”
Employment – supported, competitive, and self (sputtered and sputtering)
Person-centered planning – Mount, O’Brien, then others
Truly revolutionary
Consolidation and growth of community providers
Scandals in communities in the 1990s
CA (mortality), WA, IN, PA, and 10 others
Growth of interest in “quality” systems & approaches, but financial stagnation – trying to do better with less History, 1980s and 1990s
7. Self-Determination demonstrations – dominance of the individual and allies History – 1990s to present
8. Self-Determination: 1994 Self-Determination:
If people gain control,
Their lives will improve,
And costs will decrease
(or not increase) Tools of Self-Determination
Individual Budgets
Setting an amount and controlling its use
Independent Case Management
Support Coordination
Fiscal Intermediaries
Without conflict of interest
9. Post Self-Determination Cash & Counseling experiments in aging, now expanding
Self-direction movement in mental health and the recovery model
Sweeping changes in Waiver approaches; Independence Plus, Freedom Initiatives, experimental 1115 Waivers
Medicaid reform efforts led by ADAPT
End the “Institutional Bias” in Waivers
Ridiculous structure of Waivers: One has to “need” and be “eligible” for institutional care before being “allowed” to be supported in community
10. Coming Soon: The Perfect Storm Three storms coming
Shrinking Medicaid resources
Demographics of the developmental disabilities and elderly populations
Shrinking workforce
Will soon converge to create the perfect storm and rock the entire developmental disability system (Nerney, 2000)
11. Perfect Storm Decreasing resources
Local, state, and Federal resources; competition for resources from military priorities; Medicaid and Medicare threatened, states broke; Deficit Reduction Act
Increasing Demand
Waiting lists and Aging caregivers – will double
Workforce problems
Poor community salaries – high turnover, poor retention, low quality
Workforce pool will shrink
Demographics of who we hire – there will be fewer of these people
Competition will explode
Elders & boomers needs – will compete for resources and workers
It is NOT AN OPTION to continue “business as usual”
12. “Need Storm” in Developmental Disabilities In 2000, about 700,000 people with developmental disabilities lived at home with a family caregiver over the age of 60.
That’s about 25% of all people with developmental disabilities. (Braddock, 2002)
This is going to increase
By 2010: 1,163,000 will be living at home with aging caregivers over 60.
Waiting lists in the states now total about 74,000 for residential services – not counting other needed supports
The entire community residential system is only 411,000 people
Must grow by 18% in a big hurry (Lakin, 2006)
13. “Demographic Storm” in Aging The Aging of America
In 1900, only 1 in 25 was over 65.
In 2030, 1 in 5 will be over 65.
The fastest growing segment today among the elderly population are those over the age of 85.
The population of America ages and eventually moves from 12.5% to 20% of the entire population
But as the number of elders goes up fast, the number of young people in the labor pool will decrease by about 7%
Boomers are aging – and will not accept nursing homes
1.6 million elders went to sleep in a NH last night
Competition for the community workforce will intensify(!)
14. Creative approaches to hiring and keeping (international, elders, families, labor pools)
Cross-group alliance (aging, DD, and MH – and maybe a generic health care SD movement too)
Medicaid changes are urgently needed – National advocacy participation via ANCOR
Organized labor roles – and vast changes recently
IHSS model – extremely important to study Abstract: Providers Must Join and Enhance Alliances for Common Cause
15. Specific Ideas NH experience: providers thrived but changed
Same in Michigan, same in Vermont
Experiment, quickly, with individual budgets and how money flows in that model
Seek this out, don’t run and hide – those who learn this will thrive
Study what this state is doing about the Independence Plus Waivers and experiments with Social Security disincentives to work and individual budgets and organized labor relations
Rethink agency mission re: jobs. Offering people ways to get jobs and make money will lead to great success
16. Facets of Future Providers Future providers will look different
More and more, people receiving services will have control over the public dollars
Providers will compete, one person at a time, to put together support plans that make sense for the individual
Behaving more like a “labor pool” will be adaptive
This sounds absurd and terribly costly to us now
But some believe it’s the current system that’s absurd and too costly
We have the most expensive human service system in the history of the world
And yet huge waiting lists, low salaries, and poor worker satisfaction
Perhaps the In Home Supportive Services program of California will offer a model for future service systems
17. Labor Versus Disabilities:Adversarial History Questions of values
Organized labor existed primarily in large scale segregated settings
These settings fell out of favor in the past 30 years
Labor had to fight to preserve jobs -
Although those jobs were in settings that were not conducive to best practice
18. Hence … Advocates and organized labor usually found themselves on opposite sides…
Of institutional closures
Of legislation to expand community options
Of litigation to close institutions and expand community options
On hiring and firing practices, especially treatment of staff accused of wrongdoing
19. A New Model Emerged California, 1990s
In-Home Supportive Services
Designed for aging and disabled
County-based public employee labor pools
Better trained and better paid
To be called on by consumers as needed -
And to follow consumer direction principles
20. Consumer Direction Consumers may hire, train, supervise, and fire their individual providers
OR
Choose to use a county contracted IHSS provider or homemaker
Unions negotiate hourly wage rates either way
And some of the primary principles of self-determination are at the forefront of the new approach
21. IHSS Now All 58 counties
450,000 people, over 375,000 workers
96% of the workers only work for one person
More than 40% are relatives
Some of them, and all of the “labor pool” workers, are unionized
No strikes – no contesting firings!
Salaries vary across counties, but are higher than ever before
Robert Wood Johnson Foundation funded several years of evaluations - with positive findings
22. Choices Advocates
Continue along the present path
Low wages
High turnover
Declining quality
Increasing scandals
OR - try something entirely new, AND in keeping with best practices Organized labor
Continue along the present path
Defend institutional settings
Decreasing political support
Inevitable decline of membership
OR - try something entirely new, favoring community, and consumer direction
23. Summary Traditional provider agencies will survive, but survive better if they change
Subunits for individual budgets, self-determination, and progressive person-centered options
New, small, individual-oriented agencies are springing up, and will probably grow into the “next generation”
But “replacing” the current providers will probably be a generational phenomenon
In the meanwhile, though, Medicaid drives our system – and we can see the way Medicaid is going to change over the next decade
Watch what’s happening carefully
Bring in expertise, include in staff retreats, reconsider any strategic planning
Stay active in the national organization(s)
And watch what the largest labor union in the world is doing – SEIU.
24. The End, Thank You
Comments?
Questions?