1 / 5

Moving Forward PFM reforms In Kyrgyz Republic Next steps

Programmatic Public Expenditure Review in Bishkek, September 26, 2005. Focus on holistic approach throughout budget cycle. Key areas: formulation, execution, procurement, accounting, reporting, and audit. Emphasizing both revenue and expenditure sides of PFM at central and sub-national levels. Addressing constraints like political feasibility, technical difficulties, and absorptive capacity. Objective involves short-term quick wins and long-term institutional capacity building for efficient and transparent public spending. Action plans include short-term activities for service delivery improvement and long-term reforms for sustained effectiveness.

emmaj
Download Presentation

Moving Forward PFM reforms In Kyrgyz Republic Next steps

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Moving Forward PFM reforms In Kyrgyz Republic Next steps Programmatic Public Expenditure Review Bishkek, September 26, 2005

  2. Holistic Approach Budget cycle – Formulation, execution, procurement, accounting and reporting, external audit. Both sides of PFM – Revenues and expenditures The central government – Ministry of Finance and line Ministries. The levels of government – National versus sub-national government Binding Constraints: Political Feasibility Technical Difficulties Absorptive Capacity PFM Architecture and Action Plans Objective:Short-Term (12 Months) Quick Wins : Demonstrate Tangible and Improved Service Delivery ImprovementLong-Term (4 Yrs) : Build Sustainable Institutional Capacity to Enhance Efficiency and Transparency of Public Spending

  3. Short-Term Action Plan • Building on PEFA Assessment and PPER Findings, requiring strong Government feedback • Focusing on limited number of quick actions toward tangible public service improvement in selected areas • Coordination of all on-going TA supports if necessary • High-level government commitment and coordination are essential for quick actions • Short Term Action Plan expected in Oct/Nov 2005

  4. Long Term Action Plans • Address comprehensive institutional PFM reforms • Build on short-term action plans for continuity • Comprehensive review of on-going reform performance and identifies areas of additional donor support • Agree among donors on areas and modality of support • Systemic monitoring framework for the entire term of new government • Long term plans expected available by next PRSP

  5. Stylized Action Plans

More Related