1 / 32

A Primer for Promotion 2012-2013

A Primer for Promotion 2012-2013. Jess W Everett Chair, All-University Senate Promotion Committee everett@rowan.edu (Adapted from presentation of Barbara Bole Williams). Promotion MOA. Read it! www.rowan.edu/president/senate/. Promotion - proficiency in. Teaching Effectiveness

Download Presentation

A Primer for Promotion 2012-2013

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. A Primer for Promotion2012-2013 Jess W Everett Chair, All-University Senate Promotion Committee everett@rowan.edu (Adapted from presentation of Barbara Bole Williams)

  2. Promotion MOA • Read it! • www.rowan.edu/president/senate/

  3. Promotion - proficiency in • Teaching Effectiveness • Scholarly and Creative Activity • Contribution to University Community • Contribution to the Wider and Professional Community • Defined in MOA Appendix A

  4. Your application • Describes your experiences as a teacher, scholar, & professional • Makes compelling argument for what you do • Clearly shows how you met benchmarks

  5. Applicant • Complete promotion application • MOA Appendix 5 • Write letter to Department chair • Sign intention to apply form (Office of Provost) • Candidates for full professor Only • Provide names of 2 external evaluators to Department & Dean • CV for each evaluator

  6. Applicant • Develop portfolio organized according to promotion checklist • Portfolio contents • MOA 5.2 • Checklist • MOA Appendix E • Submit seven (7) copies • MOA 5.34411

  7. Department Responsibilities • Department Purpose Statement • Promotion Standards Balance (Weight) • Teaching Effectiveness • Scholarship and Creative Activity • Contribution to University Community • Contribution to Wider & Professional Community • Schedule for evaluation • Review standards and procedures periodically • Approved by College Deans and Provost

  8. Department Responsibilities • Faculty evaluation methods developed within department • Teaching Assessment • MOA 5.3131; 4.1123 and 4.1124 • New faculty orientation • Assist Promotion folder preparation • Optional faculty development & individual professional development plan • Plan & schedule for professional development activities

  9. Department Responsibilities • Department Promotion Committee schedules interview with applicant to review portfolio • DPC evaluate portfolio and vote • Point system optional • DPC decides FAVORABLE • DPC inform applicant and forward written report to College Promotion Committee (CPC) • Candidate  7 copies of portfolio (with departmental report) delivered to chair of College Promotion Committee • Candidate  Supplementary materials (optional) – 1 copy

  10. Department Responsibilities • DPC decides UNFAVORABLE • Written explanation provided, including how candidate does not meet the criteria • At request of candidate, meeting scheduled to discuss • Applicant can withdraw application or ask to have materials forwarded to CPC • See 5.3442 in MOA for details

  11. College Promotion Committee • Composition and election of CPC • Senate Promotion Committee runs elections for most CPC s • Role of CPC • Review DPC recommendation and evaluate applicant’s qualification • Conduct interview with applicant • Vote on applicant’s request for promotion • Forward recommendation • College Dean • University Senate Promotion Committee (USPC)

  12. College Dean • Review DPC & CPC recommendations, rationales and Applicant portfolio • Meet with applicant • Forward recommendation to candidate, DPC & CPC • If Negative, applicant may • Withdraw from further consideration, or • Appeal negative recommendation by advancing application to Provost • Positive recommendation • Automatic advance to Provost

  13. University Senate Promotion Committee • Members from each College • Chair elected by Senate • Conduct and supervise election of College Committees • Receive, retain and review all applicants who received negative recommendations or mixed votes and/or who request a review • Determine whether procedures were followed by previous committees • Certify to provost that procedures followed • Forward portfolios to Provost

  14. Administration • Provost and President is “largely procedural”, but can (and do) conduct substantive reviews • Provost review portfolios and make recommendations to President • Copies of recommendations provided to the candidate. • If not recommended , candidate may • withdraw • request materials forwarded to President for further consideration • President considers Provost recommendation and informs candidate of his/her decision • Candidates or chairs of any promotion committee can request meeting

  15. Board of Trustees • Recommendations considered by BOT at June meeting • Promotion takes effect following September

  16. Tips for Departments • Guidance in early years to support Candidate’s development • Thorough, honest, direct review to Candidate • Give Candidate things to think about, reflect upon, and grow from (things Candidate can write about) • Suggestion improvements & give constructive criticism • Peer observations, • use department criteria (not just 1-pg summary)

  17. Sample Criteria for Peer Observation • Good organization of subject matter • Appropriate pacing • Adherence to departmental syllabi & policies • Effective communication • Knowledge and enthusiasm for subject matter & teaching • Positive attitudes toward students • Fairness in examinations and grading • Flexibility in approaches to teaching • Appropriate student learning outcomes

  18. Criteria for Promotion • University-wide Criteria: Defined by the collective bargaining agreement and summarized at both the Provost’s and Senate’s websites: • www.rowan.edu/provost/aft/ • www.rowan.edu/president/senate/ • Departmental Criteria: Each Department approves promotion criteria, interpreting common university criteria in own department • Due dates: See MOA

  19. Contents of a Folder (see Promotion MOA) • Complete Checklist with page numbers • Departmental info • Terminal degree • Departmental interpretation and weighting of evaluation criteria • Role of Dept Chair • RU personnel resume (basic vita) • Candidate’s self-assessment of professional performance • Plans for future professional growth • Student evaluations and peer observations, and candidate’s responses

  20. Contents of a Folder (see Promotion MOA) • Assessment of teaching effectiveness • Evaluation letter from approved External Evaluator • Full Professor only! • Departmental evaluation of Prof Performance • Committee recommendation • Numerical vote • Names & signatures of committee members and chair • Copy of recent evaluation of Dept Committee, University Senate Committee, Dean, Provost and President • Supplemental folder (optional)

  21. Frequent Concerns • Sloppiness, lack of organization, missing page numbers • Show pride in work • Poor Candidate reflection • Poor Candidate response to student evaluations and peer observations • Provide thorough self-reflection &explanations • Missing signatures and/or dates • Missing copies of evaluations from previous review cycles • Include recent reviews at back of current folder and others in Supplemental Folder

  22. DOUBLE CHECK FOLDER • MOA checklist • Initialed by DPC Chair • Consecutive page numbers • Self-appraisal signed and dated by Candidate • Student evals signed and dated by Administrator or DPC Chair • Peer observations signed and dated by Observer and Candidate • Dept Eval signed and dated by all DPC members and Candidate

  23. Tips for Candidates • Print Double-Sided • Check and double-check file organization • Have proof-reader check spelling and grammar • Paginate all pages sequentially for easy reference • If inserting pages at the last minute, use letters with numbers (14, 14A, 15, etc) • Use tabs to divide sections of folder • Make sure all pages of Original Folder are copied

  24. Tips for Candidates (cont.) • Carefully read MOA and checklist • Know your Departm guidelines • Make a strong case • prove deserving of financial commitment from university • show pride in work • Keep and include all evaluations and letters from DPC, USPC, Dean, Provost, and President • Keep and include student evaluations and peer observations

  25. Tips for Candidates (cont.) T&R • Thorough self-reflection, explanation, and documentation of work and growth in all 4 areas • If planning to use your T&R folder also for Promotion in the year you apply for tenure (Year 5), state such in your T&R folder and follow the guidelines for each of the four areas in the Promotion Memorandum of Agreement • T&R and Promotion are two separate processes, but you may use the same application folder (beginning AY 2009-10) Prom.

  26. Modification from T&R to Promotion Keyed to Checklist • Same information, different organization • Table of Contents will differ • Be sure to follow the respective Checklists • Update information between T&R folio due date and Promotion folio due date

  27. Tips for Candidates (cont.) • Consider providing a 2-5 page “executive summary” of highlights of accomplishments (esp since most recent previous review) at front of folder • Do not leave anything open for questioning by multiple reviewers outside your Department • Respond to any and all issues raised in review letters from most recent previous review cycle • Clearly indicate dates of accomplishments • Do not double count

  28. Tips for Candidates (cont.) • Clearly describe accomplishments • Authorship • List authors / principle investigators in order of article or proposal • Journal articles, chapters or books • What was your role? • How good is the Journal or Publisher? • Why is it a good article, chapter or book? • Conference articles • In the proceedings? • Acceptance based on abstract or paper? • Grants • Include: Principle Investigators, Title, Funding Agency, $ amount, Years & Status • Status – Pending, Declined, Funded

  29. Tips for Candidates (cont.) • Include blank student evaluation form in folder • include questions that students responded to so student feedback can be interpreted by reviewers outside your Department • Explain the scoring of the student evaluations • Range (0-4 ? 1-5?) • Value (5=poor? 5=excellent?) • Create table summarizing student evals with dates and classes by semester

  30. Tips for Candidates (cont.) • Put supporting material in Supplemental File • Table of Contents • Tabs • Page numbers • Include any evaluations not in the Promotion folder in Supplemental File

  31. Where to go for help • Department Promotion Committee members • Faculty Center • Director: Deb Martin • martind@rowan.edu • 3rd Floor James Hall • Mentoring • Sample documents • Organization • Teaching tips

  32. Where to go for help (cont.) • Senate website • Faculty Promotion MOA &tips available for download • www.rowan.edu/president/senate/ • Check website for Promotion tips and documents • Provost website - http://www.rowan.edu/provost/aft/ • Chair of Senate Promotion Cmte: • Jess Everett (everett@rowan.edu)

More Related