1 / 36

Sales and Operations Planning Sustaining Performance after Implementation

Sales and Operations Planning Sustaining Performance after Implementation. Brad McCollum Sr. Manager, Materials Planning and Logistics. Ned Finch SVP, Global Supply Chain & Lifoam Operations. Agenda. Introductions A little about Jarden and Jarden Home Brands The History of Our S&OP

emmett
Download Presentation

Sales and Operations Planning Sustaining Performance after Implementation

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Sales and Operations PlanningSustaining Performance after Implementation Brad McCollum Sr. Manager, Materials Planning and Logistics Ned Finch SVP, Global Supply Chain & Lifoam Operations

  2. Agenda • Introductions • A little about Jarden and Jarden Home Brands • The History of Our S&OP • Symptoms of a Degrading Process • Keys to Maintaining Quality • Questions

  3. Jarden: The brands of everyday life

  4. Jarden: The brands of everyday life

  5. Jarden: The brands of everyday life

  6. Functional Structure - 4 Business Units Casual Entertaining Fresh Preserving Firelogs Recreational Products 2009 2011 2010

  7. OUR Success

  8. Demand: Market Facing Families…

  9. 2003-2007: Family Level Demand Max Mfg Capacity Normal Mfg Capacity

  10. Probably Not Just another year… 2008 2nd Lowest JUN in 6 Yrs

  11. The Results…

  12. Significant Increase in Sales 2009 ES&OP Kick-Off

  13. Reduced Cancellations due to Product Availability Before S&OP After S&OP ~ 50% Reduction with Significantly Higher Sales

  14. Significant Cultural Benefits • Alignment of Human Energy • Elimination of the silos • Cross Functional Education • Dials are Connected • Tactical Execution of Strategic Plans • Risks Decisions are Made at Right Levels • Inclusive Business Management • S&OP Team Owned the Sales Forecast • S&OP Team Owned the Production Plan • S&OP Team Owned the Process and Deliverables to the Exec Team • Conflict Resolution • S&OP Requires Conflict, but also Provides a Forum and Process to Management it

  15. The Challenge… Sustaining that Performance over time…

  16. Where problems occurred… Exec S&OP Meeting Integration Supply Recommendations Demand Alignment Month End Data Gathering

  17. Cracks in our Foundation • Data Conversion Issues • New Items improperly equalized • Items Missed/Not Maintained • Late Deliverables • Sliding Dates • Expanding Calendars (“I just need more time”) • Changes Occur without Confirmation • Tool Formats Change • Sources Change • Horizon Change • Quality Issues Creep into Process • Loss of Confidence in Supporting Data

  18. The Solution • Continuous Quality Assurance • Deliverables should be checked every cycle prior to their entry into the process • Track Changes Cycle over Cycle • Corrective Actions have to be Immediate and with Priority • Remember that this Data supports business critical decisions • Drive Ways to Make this Process Bullet Proof • Eliminate sources of error • Maintain a Path for Confirming Process Change • Better and more efficient ways are expected as part of the process, but still need to be confirmed by the team • Keep up with Adjacent Changes • S&OP support needs to be part of adjacent systems design/change considerations

  19. Where the problems occurred… Exec S&OP Meeting Integration Supply Response Demand Alignment Month End Data Alignment

  20. The Fundamentals of Demand Alignment Demand Alignment Customer Market History Reconciliation of Opposing Views

  21. Shortening Horizon 24 Months Time MIX VOLUME Volume/Marketing Call Consensus Demand Reconciliation Planning Time Fence Sales Call

  22. Loss of Top Down Perspective THEORIES

  23. Bias and Error BIAS

  24. Other Symptoms • Demand Alignment Meetings become shorter and shorter • The Reconciliation of Opposing Perspectives requires debate • Demand Alignment Meetings Attendance Suffers • Key players begin to decline/no show • BIAS Becomes Apparent • Prolonged Bias Results and becomes difficult to address • Supply begins taking bias into consideration • Eventually Real Alignment isn’t really happening • Error Increases without the value of the discussions required to gain alignment • The value and importance of Alignment erodes • Demand Team Members disconnect from the process and if deliverable

  25. The Solution • Never Loose the Three Legs • Retain Rigor around bottom up forecast within the Planning Time Fence • Top down is more art than science – It is the quantification of theories that are relevant to the category • Don’t let up on basis Meeting Management • Attendance • QA of Deliverables • Track and Monitor Bias and Error • Improvement should be the basis for comparison • Set and Pursue Continuous Improvement Goals

  26. Exec S&OP Meeting Integration Supply Response Demand Alignment Month End Data Alignment

  27. Reasonable Assumptions Change Product Groupings: Design Objectives: Market Facing Product Families Highest level possible based on agreed upon market drivers Reasonable Assumptions Proven Assumptions that allow demand to be applied to supply groupings Supply Grouping Grouped based on how capacities are constrained

  28. Monitors Get Lost Run Charts for each Split

  29. Capacities and Productivity Change Capacity Grouping WC1 WC2 WC3 WC4 WC4 WC5 WCN Rough-Cut Capacity Individual Capacities - Scheduled

  30. The Solution • Rigor Around Supporting Monitors • Make Run Charts part of the regular Meeting (i.e. Assumption Models) • Pursue Ways to Bullet Proof and Automate Monitors • Educate New Players on the Key Behind the Scenes Controls • As your models Mature, these Monitors/Controls become more complicated and difficult to hand-off/transfer to other resources • Aggressively Pursue Outliers/Bias • These assumptions are fundamental to your results • Monitor Adjacent Projects Impacts to S&OP Assumptions • Acquisitions • Plant/Capacity Modifications and Improvements

  31. The Results Exec S&OP Meeting Integration Supply Response Demand Alignment Month End Data Alignment

  32. Upstream Issues Create… • Last Minute Iterations before Integration and Executive Meetings • Last Minute Errors Found • Financial Integration show something totally off • Integration Meeting Content gives way to Reconciliation and Error checking instead of Substantive Discussion • Integration Meeting Attendance Dwindles • Same people you had in Supply Meetings • People Unwilling/Unable to Defend Perspective • Inconsistent perspectives exist • Backroom Discussions/Decisions • Ultimately, ES&OP Meeting Attendance Dwindles • Benefits begin to un-ravel

  33. Summary • Be vigilant with 1st Pass Quality with deliverables • Cracks in the Foundation damage the rest of the house • Don’t let the details fall to the way side… • RUN CHARTS to understand when change is occurring • Continuous Continuous Improvement • It really does take constant pressure • Survey Regularly • Flag for degrading processes • Everyone is responsible for pointing out the need for corrective actions • Watch and Track Attendance • When attendance dwindles...something is wrong • Don’t Expect New Team Members to Just “Get it” • Onboard S&OP Participants and New Executive Team Members to the Process is CRITICAL

  34. S&OP is Never Ending Continuous Improvement

  35. Questions?

More Related