130 likes | 310 Views
The existence of God: introduction. The existence of God: introductory comments Are most people theists, agnostics, or atheists because of rational arguments? Why examine rational arguments? To satisfy our rational side To integrate our religious faith with reason.
E N D
The existence of God: introduction • The existence of God: introductory comments • Are most people theists, agnostics, or atheists because of rational arguments? • Why examine rational arguments? • To satisfy our rational side • To integrate our religious faith with reason Existence of God ~ slide 1
The existence of God: introduction • To discover which approach toward God questions is the most sound • Rational arguments are not found in the Hebrew Bible, the New Testament, and the Qu’ran. Why not? Existence of God ~ slide 2
The existence of God: introduction • Some suggestions • The Jewish people & Mohammed were not concerned with the existence or non-existence of God, but with monotheism and polytheism. • The Jewish religion was not an evangelical religion; hence they did not develop an apologetic approach toward their religious faith. Cf. Christianity Existence of God ~ slide 3
The existence of God: introduction • The gap between the God of reason & the God of scripture • Some jargon • ontological arguments (Greek, ontos - “being” or “existence) • a priori & a posteriori arguments • design or teleological arguments Existence of God ~ slide 4
The existence of God: Anselm • Anselm’s ontological argument • Anselm of Canterbury (Italian, 1033-1109) Existence of God ~ slide 5
The existence of God: Anselm • Bayeux Tapestry (1073-1083) • Musée de la Reine Mathilde • Bayeux, France Existence of God ~ slide 6
The existence of God: Anselm • In the Proslogium (1078) • Opens with a prayer! • And it was written for his monks. Why? • Anselm’s position on the relationship between religious faith & reason • “Faith seeking understanding” (Proslogium, pt. 1) Existence of God ~ slide 7
The existence of God: Anselm • The argument • 1. I have an idea of “a being than which nothing greater can be conceived.” • 2. Ideas can exist in the mind only or both in the mind & in reality. For an idea to exist only in the mind is less perfect than for it to exist both in the mind & in reality Existence of God ~ slide 8
The existence of God: Anselm • 3. If the idea of the greatest being conceivable were only an idea in the mind, then it would not be the greatest being conceivable. Such an idea contains a contradiction. Existence of God ~ slide 9
The existence of God: Anselm • 4. Therefore, God exists both an an idea in the mind & as a reality. • Guanilon’s objection • We can apply the same reasoning to the existence of the greatest possible island, or the highest possible mountain. But these do not necessarily, by the fact of such reasoning, exist. Existence of God ~ slide 10
The existence of God: Anselm • Anselm’s reply to Guanilon • We can always think of a more perfect island or higher mountain. The idea of God is different; it is unique. We can’t conceive of a being greater than the greatest being conceivable. • Is Anselm’s argument a priori or a posteriori? Existence of God ~ slide 11
The existence of God: Anselm • Critical evaluation • What follows from the idea of “a being than which nothing greater can be conceived” (GBC)? • Whenever I have the idea of GBC, I must logically have [the idea that GBC exists both as an idea in the mind and as a reality]. But both of these (the idea of GBC & everything in brackets) are ideas in the mind. Existence of God ~ slide 12
The existence of God: Anselm • Briefly, the argument makes an unwarranted leap from the realm of ideas to the realm of reality. Is such a leap always fallacious? • Partial mitigation: The argument may be taken as a meditation on the attributes of God--all-loving, all-wise, all-powerful, etc. Existence of God ~ slide 13