Title I Annual Meeting

1. Title I Annual Meeting What Every Family Needs to Know! Date

2. Title I Program Purpose School participation

3. Title I provides federal funding to schools to help students meet the challenging State academic standards PURPOSE • Title I funds are targeted to schools with high numbers of children from low-income families. • Title I is part of the Every Student Succeeds Act and provides about $15 billion per year in federal aid to local schools across the United States. • More than 55,900 public schools receive Title I funds. • Title I serves more than 26 million children. • US Department of Education • Title I, Part A • Budget Tables

4. Participation

5. Assessments Types Timeline for results

6. Assessments

7. results timeline

8. Use of FUNds Program funds

9. Program Funds • Allocated so schools with the most low income students get the most funding • Allocated from the highest percentage down This chart is an example of four elementary schools and the percentage of students who receive free or reduced lunches.

10. Program Funds

11. Additional parent notification requirements parent and family engagement policy, school-parent compact, educator qualifications, additional right-to-know

12. District Policy – family engagement Board Policy 5200

13. School Parent and Family Engagement Policy

14. School-Parent Compact

15. educator Qualifications • Teachers must meet Nevada certification requirements • Paraprofessionals are highly qualified • Timely notice given if a student has been taught for 4 or more weeks in a row by a teacher who does not meet the State certification requirements, i.e., long-term substitute

16. Parents’ right-to-know – school level

17. Parents’ right-to-know – district level

18. Changes to Booth

19. 2018-2019 Booth behavior data • 189 Major Behavior Events • 84 Instances of Fighting/Physical Aggression • 57 Instances of Defiance • 119 Suspensions

20. 2018-2019 Booth academic data NSPF 2018-2019 Preliminary Report: 19 out of 100 possible points – CSI school; Provision  II; Title Funded; One Star What’s included in the NSPF rating system? • Math and ELA Growth • Math and ELA Achievement • 21% of students proficient in math • 26% of students proficient in ELA • Growth of English Language Learners • Opportunity Gaps • How well are groups catching up? • Engagement • Attendance: Earned only 4 out of 10 possible points

21. 2018-2019Goals • Goals 1&2 - We will show a decrease of 5% in the number of students listed as below grade level using the initial 2017-2018 Spring test as our baseline and the 2018 - 2019 Spring test as our final measurement. For both reading a math. • Status – Not Met - Over all none proficiency rate increased by 2% in both areas

22. 2019-2020 School performance plan (SPP) • Priority Goal #1: To improve the school climate and culture through the  improvement of student behavior with the creation of a student behavior department focused on working in triangulation between a Behavioral Specialist, Behavioral Interventionist, CIS worker and the School Counselor.  The department will consist of three components - Student/Teacher/Family and will focus on building the capacity of the individual classroom teachers to work with student behaviors through providing professional development centered on trauma informed practices, restorative practices and SEL(Behavior Specialist); Student mentoring and behavioral coaching, attendance, anger and self management and responsible decision making (Behavior Interventionist), student mental health, family resources and engagement including the Home Visit Program (CIS and Counselor).   • Measurable Objective: Historical data from over the past four school years show a total of 905 documented major behavioral events (fighting, defiance, disturbance, etc) this is an average of four times more than any other elementary school in WCSD. Additionally,  a total of 349 suspensions with 256 being off campus suspensions.  Specific data from August 2018 to March 2019 is 189 documented major behaviors and 119 out of school suspensions.   • *By the end of the 2019-2020 school year the amount of major behavior events will decrease by 55% (104 students) in comparison to 2018-2019 data as measured by documentation in Infinite Campus, school climate and academic growth data.  • *Additionally, by the end of the 2019-2020 school year the amount of suspensions will decrease by 90% (107 students) in comparison to 2018-2019 data as measured by documentation in Infinite Campus, school climate  and academic growth data.

23. 2019-2020 School performance plan • Priority Goal #2: To improve the overall pooled proficiency in ELA in grades K-6.  2018-2019 spring Reading MAP data indicates that 79% of kindergarten, 92% of 1st grade, 86% of 2nd grade, 70% of 3rd grade, 79% of 4th grade, 87% of 5th grade, and 89% of 6th grade students are below grade level in reading.  Furthermore, 2018-2019 SBAC ELA data shows 67% of 3rd grade, 68% of 4th grade, 79% of 5th grade and 84% of 6th grade student are not proficient or meeting grade level standards in reading.   • Measurable Objective #2: Research shows a direct correlation between students consistently scoring at the 60th percentile or higher in reading on the MAP assessment and their score on the SBAC ELA resulting in a level 3 or 4. On the spring 2019 MAP assessment 26% (99) of the 382 students in grades K-6 scored between the 31st and 59th percentile and 12.5% (48) scoring in the 60th-80th percentile.  • By the end of the 2019-2020 school year Libby Booth will increase the amount of students scoring in the 60th-80th percentile in reading as indicated by the Spring 2020 MAP assessment by four students per grade level in grades K-2 and eight students per grade level in grades 3-6. • Priority Goal #3: To improve the overall pooled proficiency in math in grades K-6.  Based on 2018-2019 spring Math MAP data 88% of 1st grade, 91% of 2nd grade, 79% of 3rd grade, 88% of 4th grade, 74% of 5th grade, and 94% of 6th grade students are below grade level in math. 2018-2019 SBAC Math data shows 68% of 3rd grade, 80% of 4th grade, 83% of 5th grade and 89% of 6th grade student are not proficient and meeting grade level standards in math.   • Measurable Objective #3: Research shows a direct correlation between students consistently scoring at the 65th percentile or higher in reading on the MAP assessment and their score on the SBAC math resulting in a level 3 or 4. On the spring 2019 MAP assessment 34% (115) of the 338 students in grades 1-6 scored between the 31st and 64th percentile and 9% (31) scoring in the 65th-85th percentile.  • By the end of the 2019-2020 school year Libby Booth will increase the amount of students scoring in the 65th-80th percentile in math as indicated by the Spring 2020 MAP assessment by 13 students total in grades 1-2 and 30 students total in grades 3-6.

24. Action steps • Academic/Behavior: • Create behavior department • Professional development centered on Trauma Informed Practice • Professional development on PLC • Professional development on instructional strategies • School-Wide GLAD training • Systematic MTSS and RTI • Progress monitoring • Parent Engagement: • Focus on data • Focus on attendance • Creating parent organization • Increasing parent volunteers • Teacher Home Visit Program

25. questions