480 likes | 491 Views
This project aims to shift the focus from output to welfare, transform statistics into knowledge, and promote evidence-based decision making for societal progress. It includes the development of ICT tools, advocacy, and the establishment of national roundtables on measuring progress.
E N D
Measuring Progress: Democracy in the Information Age Jon Hall & Barbara Iasiello Global Project, OECD
Global Project on Measuring the Progress of Societies We have to start measuring welfare, not just output • Angel Gurria, OECD Secretary General, 2007 Today we are bombarded by information • Jean Claude Trichet, President of the European Central Bank, 2005
An understanding of the limits of GDP is not new. Robert Kennedy spoke eloquently about this in the 1960s
Global Project on Measuring the Progress of Societies • A new approach • From output to welfare • From “information providers” to “knowledge builders” • From top-down to bottom-up • Four pillars • Statistical research • Development of ICT tools to help in transforming statistics into knowledge • Advocacy and institutional building • Development of a global infrastructure about progress • Time frame: 2007 - 2011
Building knowledge Number of users Using ICT & Civil society networks to produce and diffuse knowledge A minority Experts Information about societal progress
The Istanbul Declaration, 2007 • A culture of evidence-based decision making has to be promoted at all levels of government • We affirm our commitment to measuring and fostering the progress of societies in all their dimensions and to supporting initiatives at the country level. • We urge statistical offices, public and private organisations, and academic experts to work alongside representatives of their communities to produce high-quality, fact-based information that can be used by all of society to form a shared view of societal well-being and its evolution over time.
Implementation 2008-2009 • Official launch of the Global Project • Implementation of programmes of work and production of expected deliverables • Meeting of regional and thematic working groups • Establishments of national roundtables on measuring progress • Establish criteria for approving sets of measures of progress • 3rd OECD World Forum Charting progress, building visions, improving life(October 2009)
Key Outputs 2008-2009 • Develop best practices to measure progress • -Taxonomy of societal progress dimensions • - Handbook on Measuring Progress • - Guidelines on how to measure particular dimensions of progress • - Launch the Journal of the Progress of Societies • Promote the establishment of national roundtables for measuring progress • -Global Project web site and development of the other communication tools • - Promote regional working groups • -Regional and thematic conferences with experts, policy makers, civil society, etc • - Guidelines on how to build progress roundtables at local and national levels
Key Outputs 2008-2009 (cont'd) • Provide assistance on initiatives to measure progress • Training materials and courses • Report on what makes a set of key indicators successful • Release and promotion of ICT tools to communicate data and indicators • Best practice for developing data visualisation tools
Expected Impacts • Improving statistical capacity • A better measurement of economic, social and environmental outcomes, of their interrelation and shared data to advocate necessary reforms and evaluate their impact on societal welfare • Improvement of citizen's numeracy • Improve citizens knowledge giving them the opportunity to improve their decision making processes and to become more aware of the risks and challenges of today`s world • Improving policy making • Through greater accountability and more joined-up government • Better assessment of societal progress not simply based on the economic point of view, but with the appropriate emphasis on social, cultural an environmental dimensions
The OECD’s Istanbul World Forum • 1200 people from 130 countries • Presidents, ministers, leading academics and civil societarians, private sector and media • What is Progress? • What information do we need to assess progress in key global concerns? • From outputs to outcomes - how can we get measures used by a broad audience?
Istanbul World Forum • Istanbul Video
What is Progress? • The word progress (Latin: pro-gredi) refers to improvements, to move forward, to gain • We can speak about economic progress, social progress, scientific progress but above all we can talk about human progress
What is Progress? • Many views … “Is life getting better?” Sustainability... Well-being... Quality of Life...
What is Progress? • Many views … • But what is clear to me is A. Progress is multidimensional B. Progress means different things to different people
Dimensions of Progress Human system Human wellbeing Culture Governance Economy Resource demand Ecosystem condition Ecosystem Source: Robert Prescott-Allen, 2008
How to Measure Progress Three Approaches 1. The Accounting Framework Approach Extension of traditional economic accounts based on GDP, to capture the environment or social concerns
SESAME Approach • The SESAME can be defined as a detailed and integrated statistical information system in matrix format, from which a set of core (macro-)indicators for different aspects of well-being can be derived (Keuning, 1997) • Usually it includes many indicators as: GDP, population size, (un)employment, inequality, education, environmental indicators, etc.
Paid employment and self employed persons Male Female Total GDP Low education High education Low education High education Total employm. Agriculture, forestry and fishing … … … … … … Mining and manufacturing … … … … … … Electricity, gas and water supply … … … … … … Construction … … … … … … Trade, hotels, restaurants and repair … … … … … … Transport, storage and communication … … … … … … Finance and business services … … … … … … Other commercial services … … … … … … General government … … … … … … Care and other service activities … … … … … … Total … … … … … … Source: Keuning, S., Verbruggen, M., European Structural Indicators – a Way Forward. June 2003.
Strengths & Weaknesses • Very powerful tool for analysis • Investment in terms of the amount of data to be collected and the resources needed
How to Measure Progress Three Approaches 2.The One-Number Approach Development of composite indicators of progress that combine detailed information into a single measure
Subtract “real” costs (eg defensive expenditure, social cost) The GPI GDP Genuine ProgressIndicator Add uncounted benefits (eg Unpaid work, parenting)
Strengths & Weaknesses • Powerful tool for advocacy • Difficulty in aggregating units measured in different ways – adding apples and oranges, or valuing things like “parenting” in $s • Difficult to interpret the results without stepping back to investigate the components
How to Measure Well-being Three Approaches 3. The Suite of Indicator Approach Identification of a set of key indicators covering economic, social and environmental domains
Strengths & Weaknesses • It has the advantage of covering a wide range of topics, without the need of estimating individual weights. • Can be difficult to interpret • Can include too much information
Indicators • Measures should be “unambiguous" that is have a clear good/bad direction of movement • Important to focus on the big picture • Important to discuss the links between indicators ….. trade-offs and reinforcements Life expectancy √ X Numbers of patients treated X
Progress: Objective and Subjective Components • Objective components – longevity, income, air quality The stuff we can measure exactly
Progress: Objective and Subjective Components • Subjective components – fear, trust, happiness, life satisfaction Business ConfidenceSelf assessed health Must ask people how they feel
Measuring Subjective Well-being Arguments For • Nice organising principle • Public are interested – and a growing demand • Solid evidence that high subjective wellbeing correlates with other “hard” aspects of wellbeing e.g. health
Happiness and Health The Nuns
Measuring Subjective Well-being Arguments Against • Difficult to measure • Difficult to find policy relevance for measures (at least for generalised measures of life satisfaction) • Doesn’t appear to change a great deal over time (though there is a life course effect) • Not “appropriate” ground for a statistical office
The benefits • Help countries prioritize resource allocation • Promote accountability and enhance citizen engagement.
The benefits – for citizens • Improve citizens knowledge giving them the opportunity to improve their decision making processes and to become more aware of the risks and challenges of today’s world
The benefits – for policy makers • Policy makers can better assess the current situation, make more informed decisions, and measure progress over time and relative to other nations • Better coordination in government • Data to advocate necessary reforms and evaluate their impact on societal welfare
The benefits – for countries • By highlighting the issues that genuinely matter to a society, a set of progress measures can help a country best meet the needs of its citizens by focussing attention on thekey outcomes • ‘Sunshine is the best disinfectant’….transparency has the ability to reduce waste, prevent corruption, and shift resources where they’re truly needed
Progress Measures Can Help… • Enhance democracy … • … enhance decision making … • … and so generate progress • Promote greater accountability • Enhance the quality of public debate
“Measuring the Progress of Societies is one of the most important roles the OECD can take on” • Angel Gurria, OECD Secretary General • "World GDP growth has been faster than it has been for a very long time. But people are not particularly happy" • KemalDervis, Head of UNDP • " Progress indicators are a way for people to hold their government’s accountable " • Francois Bourguignon, Chief Economist of the World Bank