1 / 9

Information day: EU-Russia Coordinated Calls 2008, Moscow, 13/12/2007

Information day: EU-Russia Coordinated Calls 2008, Moscow, 13/12/2007. Evaluation of proposals in the EU FP[7]. Richard Burger Science Counsellor Delegation of the European Commission to Russia Directorate-General for Research European Commission. Proposal.

erma
Download Presentation

Information day: EU-Russia Coordinated Calls 2008, Moscow, 13/12/2007

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Information day: EU-Russia Coordinated Calls 2008,Moscow, 13/12/2007 Evaluation of proposals in the EU FP[7] Richard Burger Science Counsellor Delegation of the European Commission to Russia Directorate-General for Research European Commission

  2. Proposal Submission and Evaluation in FP7 Eligibility Individual evaluation Security Scrutiny (if needed) Consensus Thresholds Applicants informed of results of expert evaluation* Panel review with hearing (optional) Ethical Review (if needed) Commission ranking • invitation to submit second-stage • proposal, when applicable Negotiation Commission rejection decision Consultation of Programme Committee (if required) Applicants informed of Commission decision Commission funding and/or rejection decision

  3. Evaluation of each proposal Proposal X copy 1 IER expert 1 Proposal X copy 2 Consensus meeting CR 3 experts IER expert 2 Proposal X copy 3 IER expert 3 • Note: There may be more than 3 evaluators • IER = Individual Evaluation Report • CR = Consensus Report

  4. Evaluation process - Basic principles Excellence Fairness & Impartiality Transparency “Evaluation Rules” Guide for applicants (annex 2) Confidentiality Ethical & Security Considerations Efficiency & Speed

  5. Evaluating a proposal Three Guiding Principles: • Objectivity • Each proposal is evaluated as it is written • Accuracy • Experts make their judgment against the official evaluation criteria, and nothing else • Consistency • Experts apply the same standard of judgment to each proposal

  6. The evaluation criteria • Criteria adapted to each funding scheme and each thematic area • specified in the work programme • Three main criteria: • Scientific & Technological Quality (relevant to the topic of the call) • Concept, objective, work-plan • Implementation • Individual participants and consortium as a whole • Allocation of resources • Impact • Contribution to expected impacts listed in workprogramme • Plans for dissemination/exploitation

  7. Consensus • Built on the basis of the individual evaluations • The aim is agreement on scores and comments • Usually involves a discussion • “Outlying” opinions need to be explored • Not just a simple averaging exercise • It is quite normal for individual views to change • Moderated by a Commission staff-member • helps the group reach a conclusion • provides information if necessary • does not contribute opinions

  8. All these provisions, principles & procedures are laid out in detail in the FP7 legal documents for implementation: “Rules for submission, evaluation, selection, award” • http://cordis.europa.eu/fp7/find-doc_en.html • http://cordis.europa.eu/fp7/find-doc_en.html#implementation

  9. International Cooperation

More Related