150 likes | 280 Views
Physicians’ Attitudes to Methadone Maintenance Treatment in Nova Scotia. Jessica Dooley*, M.Sc. Candidate Dr. Susan Kirkland*, Ph. D. Dr. Mark Asbridge*, Ph. D. Dr. John Fraser † , M.D. *Department of Community Health and Epidemiology, Dalhousie University
E N D
Physicians’ Attitudes to Methadone Maintenance Treatment in Nova Scotia Jessica Dooley*, M.Sc. Candidate Dr. Susan Kirkland*, Ph. D. Dr. Mark Asbridge*, Ph. D. Dr. John Fraser †, M.D. *Department of Community Health and Epidemiology, Dalhousie University † Direction 180, North End Community Health Centre
Introduction • 60,000-90,000 Canadians misuse opioids • Methadone Maintenance Treatment (MMT) is an effective treatment • Daily dosing with methadone (a long-acting opioid agonist) to prevent withdrawal symptoms, cravings and euphoric effects of opioids • Extent to which policies and programs are developed and accessible varies between geographical/professional settings and facilities • Office-based delivery suggested as a way of improving access and capacity • Success of such a model depends on willingness of physicians to deliver it
Public health implications of opioid misuse • Associated conditions include: • HIV, hepatitis C, overdose, suicide, endocarditis, abscesses, infection, poor nutrition, adverse drug interactions (Fisher et al., 2004, Hser et al., 2001, Health Canada, 2007) • Associated co-morbidities include: • Poly-drug dependence, hypertension, diabetes, asthma, chronic liver disease, cirrhosis (Gossop et al., 1997; Haydon, et al., 2003, Brooner et al., 1997; Darke and Ross, 1997) • Premature mortality is characteristic (Hser et al., 2001, Millson et al., 2004) • Effects extend to families and communities • Blood borne diseases, criminality, economic implications (Fisher et al., 2004; Hser et al., 2001; Wall et al., 2001)
Efficacy and effectiveness of methadone • Randomized controlled trials have shown methadone to be pharmacologically efficacious and safe (Novich et al., 1993; Kreek, 1973, Donny et al., 2005) • Reduces opioid use, use of other illicit drugs, frequency of drug injection, high risk drug use behaviours, criminal activity, morbidity, mortality (Strain et al., 1993; Thiede et al., 2000; Johansson et al.; 2007, Fairbank et al., 1993, Dolan et al., 2003; Gossop et al., 2003, Willner-Reid et al., 2007; Millson et al., 2007; Fabris et al., 2006; Bell et al., 1997, Langendam et al., 2001; Brugal et al., 2005; Caplehorn and Drummer, 1999) • Office-based MMT shown to be effective in numerous RCTs (Fiellin et al., 2001, Gossop et al., 1999, 2003) • High patient and provider satisfaction (Fiellin et al., 2001) • Advantages may include reduced stigma, more attention to medical and mental health concerns, easy geographical access, improved treatment retention (Fiellin et al., 2001; Salsitz et al., 2000).
Current Canadian context (Popova et al., 2006)
Overall objectives • Assess acceptability of office-based MMT among non-specialist physicians in Nova Scotia • Determine extent to which office-based MMT has the potential to enhance accessibility and capacity • Establish the context in which office-based MMT could be integrated in Nova Scotia
Methods • E-mail survey of population of all non-specialist physicians in Nova Scotia (1170) using OPINIO software • Administered twice, 10 days apart • Clarify attitudes about: • Illicit drug use and maintenance-oriented treatment • Treatment of opioid-dependent individuals in their practices • Barriers and facilitators to MMT delivery in private office-based practice
Acceptability of office-based MMT • Key Measures: • Willingness to participate in office-based MMT • Perceived barriers and facilitators to office-based MMT • Attitudes towards drug use • Disapproval of drug use scale (DDU) • Attitudes towards principles of harm reduction • Abstinence orientation scale (AOS) • Knowledge of the risks and benefits of MMT • Test of knowledge of MMT (KNOW) (Caplehorn, 1996)
Preliminary Results (n=124) Age Sex Community Size Training in Addiction Medicine Medical School License to prescribe methadone for opioid dependence
Barriers influencing decision to be involved in MMT delivery
Potential limitations • Response rate • Survey error • Researcher bias • Response selection bias • Item bias • Social desirability bias • Generalizeability
Preliminary Conclusions • Considerable acceptance of MMT in the province • Potential for improved access to MMT in the province • Areas for improvement for integration of MMT clearly highlighted • Education • Interaction with other providers • Support Services
Support In association with: • The Atlantic Interdisciplinary Research Network for Social and Behavioural Issues in HIV/AIDS and Hepatitis C (AIRN) • The College of Physicians and Surgeons of Nova Scotia Funded by: • Canadian Institutes of Health Research Master’s Award • Dalhousie University Faculty of Medicine Marvin Burke Award