1 / 8

Course Program Institutional

Course Program Institutional. Student Services Viability Review Process - DRAFT 3/5/12. Program Review (CPR/APRU). Grow. Viable. Enhance. SSPBT. Maintain. Questions. SSPBT Review Teams. Joint PBT Consultation/ Communication. Viability

esma
Download Presentation

Course Program Institutional

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Course Program Institutional

  2. Student Services Viability Review Process - DRAFT 3/5/12 Program Review (CPR/APRU) Grow Viable Enhance SSPBT Maintain Questions SSPBT Review Teams Joint PBT Consultation/ Communication Viability Advisory Group Improvement Implementation Recommendations and Timelines Change Direction FH/ DAC Reduce SSPBT Discontinue Discontinuance Impact Report College Council Jhh 3/5/12

  3. SSPBT Viability Review Process • Programs continually assess the effectiveness and efficiency of their services and report their findings and related resource needs in their Comprehensive and Annual Program Reviews • SSPBT members are assigned to read 2-3 Program Reviews (Not their own). Readers report back to SSPBT with an initial recommendation for each service in a program to be Viable or to raise Questions about the viability of the service

  4. Resource Allocation • The SSPBT makes resource allocation recommendations to the College Council. • The term Resource is used in broad terms and includes: • Personnel (faculty, classified professionals, administrators) • Equipment (instructional, non-instructional) • Facilities • Professional Growth • Operating budgets

  5. Recommendations • SSPBT after hearing all reader reports including the program’s own recommendations and considering any other information available declares the service in a program to be: • Viable and should: • Grow • Be enhanced, or • Be maintain at current level • Questionable and needs to: • Change direction • Reduce, or • Be discontinued

  6. Viable • “Grow” The program is encouraged to expand its service to effectively and efficiently serve more students with its existing resources. SSPBT could allocate additional resources as needed for the program to grow. • “Be enhanced” The program is encouraged to improve the effectiveness and efficiency of its service to students with its existing resources. SSPBT could allocate additional resources as needed for the program to become more effective and efficient.

  7. Viable • It is understood that the “be maintained”designation is the default designation and most services will fall into this category. • “Be maintained” The program is encouraged to continue its effective and efficient service to students with its existing resources. SSPBT could allocate additional resources as needed for the program to maintain its level effectiveness and efficiency.

  8. Viable • Before the SSPBT declares a service to be viable and gives it a grow, enhance, or maintain designation it will consult/communicate with the IPBT and FERPBT. • The SSPBT will not assign a viability designation until it understands the college-wide implications. • The default designation for all services in a Student Services program will be to maintain the service.

More Related