1 / 5

“Determining Substanial Equivalency Related to Credentials Evaluation”

“Determining Substanial Equivalency Related to Credentials Evaluation”. Edwina McGroddy Institute of Chartered Accountants of Ontario. Presented at the 2005 CLEAR Annual Conference September 15-17 Phoenix, Arizona. Equivalency Assessments: Academic or Competency. Accounting in Canada

estralita-mendez
Download Presentation

“Determining Substanial Equivalency Related to Credentials Evaluation”

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. “Determining Substanial Equivalency Related to Credentials Evaluation” Edwina McGroddy Institute of Chartered Accountants of Ontario Presented at the 2005 CLEAR Annual Conference September 15-17 Phoenix, Arizona

  2. Equivalency Assessments: Academic or Competency • Accounting in Canada • IQAB/Canadian Institute of Chartered Accountants • Provincial Institutes Presented at the 2005 CLEAR Annual Conference September 15-17 Phoenix, Arizona

  3. Level Playing Field • AIT compliant: Interprovincial mobility • NAFTA compliant • Tri-Laterial Agreement for reciprocal recognition between Mexico, US and Canada (signed on September 27, 2002) Presented at the 2005 CLEAR Annual Conference September 15-17 Phoenix, Arizona

  4. Real Life Examples • From Germany • From Romania • From the US • From Mexico Presented at the 2005 CLEAR Annual Conference September 15-17 Phoenix, Arizona

  5. Academic or Competency • Combination of both • Rigorous and sophisticated system • Individual assessments • Subject to appeal • Success rates • Continuous change Presented at the 2005 CLEAR Annual Conference September 15-17 Phoenix, Arizona

More Related