70 likes | 78 Views
CLUE WG Interim Meeting Andover, MA Oct. 11-12th, 2011. Mary Barnes (WG co-chair) Paul Kyzivat (WG co-chair). Note Well.
E N D
CLUE WG Interim Meeting Andover, MA Oct. 11-12th, 2011 • Mary Barnes (WG co-chair) • Paul Kyzivat (WG co-chair)
Note Well • Any submission to the IETF intended by the Contributor for publication as all or part of an IETF Internet-Draft or RFC and any statement made within the context of an IETF activity is considered an "IETF Contribution". Such statements include oral statements in IETF sessions, as well as written and electronic communications made at any time or place, which are addressed to: • the IETF plenary session, • any IETF working group or portion thereof, • the IESG or any member thereof on behalf of the IESG, • the IAB or any member thereof on behalf of the IAB, • any IETF mailing list, including the IETF list itself, any working group or design team list, or any other list functioning under IETF auspices, • the RFC Editor or the Internet-Drafts function • All IETF Contributions are subject to the rules of RFC 5378 and RFC 3979 (updated by RFC 4879). Statements made outside of an IETF session, mailing list or other function, that are clearly not intended to be input to an IETF activity, group or function, are not IETF Contributions in the context of this notice. Please consult RFC 5378 and RFC 3979 for details. • A participant in any IETF activity is deemed to accept all IETF rules of process, as documented in Best Current Practices RFCs and IESG Statements. • A participant in any IETF activity acknowledges that written, audio and video records of meetings may be made and may be available to the public.
Agenda (Day 1) - morning • 09:00-09:10 Chair - status, agendabash • 09:10-09:50 Discussion of any remaining open issues for the use cases and requirements • 09:50-10:00 Short coffee break • 10:00-11:30 Framework: • New material in draft-romanow-clue-framework-01 (40) (Andy Pepperell, Brian Baldino) • Message exchange model (provider/consumer) vs SDP offer/answer (20) (AllynRomanow) • Introduction of Issues (30) (AllynRomanow) • 11:30-13:00 Lunch
Agenda (Day 1) - afternoon • 13:00-15:00 Framework: • Comments & Issues (40) (Roni Even) • Locating scenes (20) (Marshall Eubanks) • Issue discussion (60) (AllynRomanow) • 15:00-15:20 Break • 15:20-16:00 Issue discussion (cont). (AllynRomanow) • 16:00-16:30 CLUE and RTCWEB (Mary, Justin) • 16:30-18:00 Summary and identification of key items for discussion on Tuesday (Chairs)
Agenda (Day 2) • 08:30-08:45 Plans for the day • 08:45-10:30 Discussion • 10:30-10:45 Break • 10:45-12:30 Discussion • 12:30-13:00 Discussion of way forward and summary of action items
Use Casesdraft-ietf-clue-telepresence-use-cases-01 • Use case document is near completion: • Unfortunately, pre-WGLC did not garner sufficient review. • Need more detailed reviews to determine readiness for official WGLC • Issues: • Presentation use case is restricted to the video based solution • Is that a problem?
Requirementsdraft-ietf-clue-telepresence-requirements-00 • Document is near completion: • WG needs to review for completeness • Issues: • How comprehensive does the document need to be? • Sufficient enough to inform the solution? • Comprehensive enough to cover all requirements for a solution? • Several issues raised by Christian undergoing discussion on mailing list.