1 / 12

Local campaigning on waste

Local campaigning on waste. Contents. Introduction Who works on waste, and why? Waste in the UK – national FoEcus Sustainable waste management A new government, and new context What we can do? Split and discuss: Positives and Negatives?. Consumption is increasing.

ethan-patton
Download Presentation

Local campaigning on waste

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Local campaigning on waste

  2. Contents • Introduction • Who works on waste, and why? • Waste in the UK – national FoEcus • Sustainable waste management • A new government, and new context • What we can do? • Split and discuss: Positives and Negatives?

  3. Consumption is increasing... Global resource use is decoupled from GDP growth – but is still going up [1]

  4. Why is resource use important? • The foundation of our economy • Resource extraction (and disposal) leads to major environmental and social impacts • Huge inequality in resource consumption • Only one earth, ... Climate change, biodiversity, rights,resource wars... • Yet the UK buries or burns over £650 million recyclable material every year [2]?

  5. The waste hierarchy... • The top of the hierarchy is good: I) Prevention II) Reuse III) Recycling, Composting/AD • Bottom is bad: I) Incineration II) Landfill (unless ...)

  6. The UK Context

  7. 1) The good stuff: • Prevention • We need to create plans and set targets • Recycling (visibility) boosts prevention • Reuse • Landfill diversion, cheap furniture, electricals etc, jobs • Recycling • Kerbside sorting; civic amenity/bring sites; wide range • Use high quality MBT to maximise recycling • Anaerobic Digestion food waste etc • 100% renewable energy, plus soil conditioner • In High quality MBT, or composting, before landfilling

  8. 2) The not so good... • All the above are good for climate, resource efficiency, biodiversity, rights, jobs, ... • Incineration • Is bad for climate – 1/3 less carbon efficient than modern gas • Very expensive, with long contracts binding councils • Inflexible, and competes with reuse, recycling, AD • 1/10 jobs of recycling • Landfill • Also bad for climate, unless after high quality MBT • Less bad for climate than incineration if treated • Phasing out anyway

  9. 3) The context • New government: • Pro AD and less enthusiastic (?) about incineration • Claims to be the greenest ever • Claims wants to match European recycling rates • Anti targets, anti duties on councils, anti legislation, • Pro “voluntary measures”, including “rewards” e.g. Recyclebank • Austerity: good (cuts to bad PFI schemes) or bad (other investment)? • Waste review • Announced June, initial ‘results’ spring ‘11 • But already said ‘minded’ not to ban landfilling recyclables 05/25/10

  10. 05/25/10

  11. References [1] “Overconsumption? Our use of the world’s natural resources”, Friends of the Earth Europe/Sustainable Europe Research Institute, September 2009:http://www.foeeurope.org/publications/2009/Overconsumption_Sep09.pdf [2] “Gone to waste: the valuable resources that European countries bury and burn”, Friends of the Earth, October 2009:http://www.foe.co.uk/resource/reports/gone_to_waste.pdf

  12. 4) What can we do ....? over to you! Group discussions, Followed by report back 05/25/10

More Related