1 / 25

Mark McHenry Shared Spectrum Company 703-761-2818 mmchenry@sharedspectrum

Frequency Agile Spectrum Access Technologies Presentation to FCC Workshop on Cognitive Radios May 19, 2003. Mark McHenry Shared Spectrum Company 703-761-2818 mmchenry@sharedspectrum.com. Agenda. Requirements Spectrum occupancy characteristics Significant amount of “low hanging fruit”

ethan
Download Presentation

Mark McHenry Shared Spectrum Company 703-761-2818 mmchenry@sharedspectrum

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Frequency Agile Spectrum Access TechnologiesPresentation toFCC Workshop on Cognitive RadiosMay 19, 2003 Mark McHenry Shared Spectrum Company 703-761-2818 mmchenry@sharedspectrum.com

  2. Agenda • Requirements • Spectrum occupancy characteristics • Significant amount of “low hanging fruit” • Spectrum access methods • Listen-Before Talk • “TDMA” spectrum • Broadcast spectrum • Probe • Geo-location/database

  3. Frequency Agile Radio Requirements • Create insignificant interference • Secondary operation with minimal requirement for coordination with primary system licensees • Unlicensed with equipment certifications on a system basis to assure avoidance of interference • Operate in multiple bands • Assured capacity • Offer cost/capacity/link range/deployment benefits • Access more (5 X?) spectrum than any current system • Operate in VHF/UHF TV band • Rapid spectrum agreements for itinerate use

  4. Spectrum Occupancy Is Low • “In many bands, spectrum access is a more significant problem than physical scarcity of spectrum, in large part due to legacy command-and-control regulation that limits the ability of potential spectrum users to obtain such access.”1 • Shared Spectrum’s measurements indicate • Many bands have no detectable occupancy • Some bands have low occupancy • Some bands have high occupancy Note 1: FCC Spectrum Policy Task Force Report, page 3

  5. Typical Spectrum Occupancy Measurement FCC should conduct and publish spectrum occupancy measurements to identify low occupancy bands No signals Medium and short duration signals

  6. Initially Harvest the Low Hanging Fruit • Measurements show a large quantity of long duration, large area spectrum holes • “Simple” spectrum access methods are sufficient • Minimal coordination between transceivers • Moderate computational costs • Later evolve algorithms to handle more complex situations • Short duration, small spectrum holes • Optimize frequency assignments for increased capacity

  7. Agenda • Requirements • Spectrum occupancy characteristics • Significant amount of “low hanging fruit” • Spectrum access methods • Listen-Before Talk • “TDMA” spectrum • Broadcast spectrum • Probe • Geo-location/database

  8. Adaptive, Receive-Only Spectrum Access Method • Pmax TX = 10*log10(k * T * B) + PPrimary – Pmeasured - Margin • Margin = 10 to 20 dB, required for cummulative effects, rapid propagation changes, false alarm minimization • T – Interference Noise Temperature, in K • B = signal bandwidth, in Hz

  9. Frequency Agile Transceivers Exclusion Zone Primary Transceivers Interference/Connectivity Limit Frequency Agile Coverage “Morphs” To Fit Primary Users Hidden-node problem overcome by each Frequency Agile transceiver listening to all Primary users within range

  10. High Sensitivity Receiver Performance

  11. West Virginia location • 3 m antenna height 10 ground vehicles spread over 25 km moving at 25 km/hr 10 stationary ground vehicles spread over 25 km Simulation Example • Primary users are stationary • XG users are mobile • Omni-directional antennas • 420 MHz signal frequency

  12. Actual loss Interference Link closure • Longley-Rice Model • 420 MHz Free space loss Propagation Losses

  13. TX Power and Interference Frequency Agile network reduces TX power automatically XG TX Power (dBm) Network needs switch to another frequency at low TX power levels Target interference level of –100 dBm Primary Interference Level (dBm)

  14. Listen-Only Method in the Broadcast Bands PT (kW) TV Receiver HAAT (m) L2 TV Transmitter L1 TV Receiver Differential propagation loss = L1-L2 Frequency Agile Transceiver Region of Potential Interference

  15. Transmit Power Rule • Pmax TX = Po if Primary signal is not detected • = Transmission prohibited if Primary signal is detected • where, Pmax TX = Frequency Agile transmitter power level, in dBm • Po = specified power value, in dBm

  16. Minimal Interference TV Receiver with Grade B reception LOS Location TV Transmitter LOS to Frequency Agile Transceiver Building Blockage Terrain Blockage Frequency Agile Transceiver Multi-Path Effects • Joint probability of three conditions • Agile Receiver doesn’t detect TV signal • Primary user receives TV signal • D/U < 15 dB

  17. Maximum Differential Propagation Value Signal level at TV receiver Minimum Signal Strength – “Grade B” (-81 dBm) Received Power (dBm) Min D/U =15 dB Acceptable Interference = Thermal Noise (-96 dBm) 40 dB 25 dB Maximum practical sensitivity improvement due to special detection processing Minimum Detectable Signal (-121 dBm) Signal level at Frequency Agile receiver Maximum differential propagation value = 40 dB

  18. Simulation of Differential Propagation Scenario – Mid-Atlantic Region Elevation contours TV transmitters Test reception points along a ~ 8 km path

  19. ~30 dB change in propagation loss over a small distance Signal from TV station A Signal from TV station B Large Change in Propagation Loss over a Short Distance is Rare

  20. Low Power Transmitters Have a Small Interference Range 1 mW transmit power Maximum interference range of 600 m in obstructed conditions Maximum interference range of 4 km in free-space Noise Free-space propagation Obstructed propagation

  21. Spectrum Probing Method Frequency Agile monitors 2) Very weak signal doesn’t interfere with primary user Broadcast Receiver 75 km to 200 km spacing 3) Measure Pr of the very weak signal using high processing gain 4) Pt minus Pr is the propagation loss Frequency Agile transceiver 5) Repeat with N nodes to estimate minimum propagation loss into area 1) Transmit (Pt) at a very low power

  22. Geo-Location Method TV Receiver HAAT (m) PT (kW) Guard Distance Region of Potential Interference TV Transmitter TV Receiver • Position information • GPS, telephone Protected Area Frequency Agile Transceiver • Protected area boundary database information • Telephone, over-the-air, special beacons, Internet, manually entered Beacon TX

  23. Significant “White Space” Between TV Coverage Areas Grade B 50% and 90% contours Channel 5 and channel 54

  24. How Large A Guard Distance? 1 W transmit power Maximum interference range of > 100 km in free-space Noise Maximum interference range of 2 km in obstructed conditions Large guard distances reduce spectrum harvest TV bands: 100 km is too large >> Limit TX power to mW’s Other bands: Max TX power ?

  25. Summary • Multiple, robust spectrum access methods • Listen-Before Talk • “TDMA” spectrum • Broadcast spectrum • Geo-location/database • FCC should conduct and publish spectrum occupancy measurements • Many spectrum holes are large and have long duration • FCC should allow experimental interactive operations • All access methods including Probe • TV and other bands

More Related