AS9110 – Revision Status and Training

1. AS9110 – Revision Status and Training Reported by: Rick Downs Date of Report: 2011 July

2. Team Members • Team Leader/AAQG Leader: Jeff Wood (Boeing) • APAQG Leader: Azmi Fuadi (Indonesian Aerospace) • EAQG Leader: Jean-Francis Suquet (Eurocopter) • Team Members: • AAQG Representatives: Felipe Reyes (Aveos); Norm Dubay & Dave Hardin (Honeywell); Sidney Vianna (Det Norske Veritas); Bill Frazier (General Electric); Tom Susan (Rockwell Collins); Roger Ritterbeck (QMI – SAI Global);Tracy Parks & Jeff Fiscus (United Technologies); Peter Friedkin (Parker Aerospace); Max Mills (Gulfstream);Mahmoud Chamseddine (Bombardier); Dan Von Flue (Harter Aerospace) • EAQG Representatives: David Hope (Rolls-Royce); Julian Temple (BSI); Daniel Albier (certified auditor);Bernhard Schneider (MTU Aero Engines); Stephane Richard (Zodiac Aerospace); Hans-Rainer Ziemer (EADS Defense & Security); Phillippe Poncelin-de-Raucourt (SAFRAN); Flavio Izzo (Alenia Aeronautica)

3. Supporting Information The 9110 certification numbers will most likely increase in a similar fashion (slow, steady increase), but unless there is greater industry recognition (e.g., regulatory authorities, airlines, IAQG member companies) to actively promote and/or mandate certification … no dramatic changes in certification numbers will be made We kicked off the MRO Relationship Growth Strategy Stream in October 2008; though there has been a 106% increase in the total number of certificates, it only amounts to an increase of 204 certificates [increase from 192 (Sept. 2008) to 396 (July 2011)] To put this in perspective … in the same time frame 9100 certificates increased by 42%, but that increase amounted to 3903 certificates [increase from 9,159 (Sept. 2008) to 13,063 (July 2011)] Revision to standard to address industry stakeholder feedback

4. Limited 9110 Standard Revision Purpose of the revision Incorporate editorial corrections Consider/address stakeholder needs Enhance clarity of requirements to resolve interpretation issues Ensure the standard is compatible for use by all stakeholders Proposed revisions Stakeholder feedback/input provided for consideration Recommendations identified from gap/comparison analysis leaders for consideration Initiated revision – April 2010 Estimated publication date – Oct. 2011 IAQG sector re-ballot of standard to close September 28th, 2011

5. Stakeholders Comments on 9110 Compilation of the stakeholders comments; majority of feedback/comments originated from EASA Final review/disposition of comments done at recent IAQG meeting in York, UK by the IAQG MRO Relationship Growth Strategy Stream Disposition of (62) stakeholder comments: (38) items are “amending” the 9110 standard (limited’ revision), among which (3) comments are also “forward” to other IAQG teams (i.e., IAQG Dictionary, 9100 team) (3) items are “forward” to other 9100 IAQG teams for future consideration (21) items need “no action”: e.g., clarification, comment on ISO text, topic already addressed in another clause, … This input drove the revision of the standard

6. 9110 Standard Revision Report – Ballot Results AAQG/AAQSC ballot closed (02/08/11) 19 - Approved (37 comments provided) 0 - Disapproved 1 - Waived APAQG ballot closed (04/09/11) Approved (7 comments provided) EAQG ballot closed (05/08/11) 9 - Approved (56 comments provided) 1 - Disapproved (77 comments provided) 2 - Waived Supporting Information These results and associated resolution required re-ballot of the standard

7. Based on the revisions made we anticipate that a self study guide will be distributed to those already completing the 9110 AATT course. In addition, the AATT course will be updated going forward. This is tentative, a final decision will be made once the standard is published. Expected Training Update

8. Questions? 8