350 likes | 455 Views
Diagnostic capability of FG/SP. Kiyoshi Ichimoto NAOJ. Hinode workshop , 2007.12.8-10, Beijing. Contents: Spectral windows of SOT Available spectral lines and their Zeeman properties Detection limit for the magnetic field w/ polarization sensitivity of SOT
E N D
Diagnostic capability of FG/SP Kiyoshi Ichimoto NAOJ Hinode workshop, 2007.12.8-10, Beijing
Contents: • Spectral windows of SOT • Available spectral lines and their Zeeman properties • Detection limit for the magnetic field • w/ polarization sensitivity of SOT • - Retrievability of magnetic field from NFI observables
Field of view 218" × 109" (full FOV) CCD 4k × 2k pixel (full FOV), shared with the NFI Spatial Sampling 0.0541 arcsec/pixel (full resolution) Spectral coverage Center (nm) Width (nm) Line of interest Purpose 388.35 0.7 CN I Magnetic network imaging 396.85 0.3 Ca II H Chromospheric heating 430.50 0.8 CH I Magnetic elements 450.45 0.4 Blue continuum Temperature 555.05 0.4 Green continuum Temperature 668.40 0.4 Red continuum Temperature Exposure time 0.03 - 0.8 sec (typical) SOT broadband filters
Contribution function of BFI continuum log(t5000)
Response function of BFI intensity from DT/T courtesy Dr. Mats Carlsson
CH3883, CN4305 (G-band) formation height Quiet region S. V. Berdyugina etal., 2003, A&A 412, 513–527 sunspot
Field of view 328"×164" (unvignetted 264"×164") CCD 4k×2k pixel (full FOV), shared with BFI Spatial sampling 0.08 arcsec/pixel (full resolution) Spectral resolution 0.009nm (90mÅ) at 630nm Spectral windows (nm) and lines of interest Center l-range Lines geff Purpose 517.2 0.6 Mg I b 517.27 1.75 Dopplergrams and magnetograms 525.0 0.6 Fe I 524.71 2.00 Photospheric magnetograms Fe I 525.02 3.00 Fe I 525.06 1.50 557.6 0.6 Fe I 557.61 0.00 Photospheric Dopplergrams 589.6 0.6 Na I D 589.6 1.33 Very weak fields (scattering polarization)Chromospheric fields 630.0 0.6 Fe I 630.15 1.67 Photospheric magnetograms Fe I 630.25 2.50 Ti I 630.38 0.92 Umbral magnetograms 656.3 0.6 H I 656.28 ~1.3? Chromosphreic structure Exposure time 0.1 - 1.6 sec (typical) SOT narrowband filter
NFI589.60 Na D1 D2 D1
Zeeman patterns of NFI lines MG1 5172.680 3P1 - 3S1 2.700 -.3800WI 1259.0 b2 FE1 6302.503 5P1 - 5D0 3.686 -.6100CW 83.0 FE1 5250.207 5D0 - 7D1 .121 -4.4600CW 62.0 NA1 5895.920 2S0.5 - 2P0.5 .000 -.1840MS 564.0* H 1 6562.740 1 2S 0.5 2P 0.5 10.199 -.0606WI 4020.0
Time res. # of wavelength (reliability) 1sec 64 10sec 16 1min 10min 4 2 1hr 1 1day FOV 10” 100” 1000” Spatial res. 1” 0.4” 0.2” 0.1” 1min 1% 1hr 0.1% 1day 1week 0.01% Random noise (detection limit) Time span SOT performance SOT/NFI full image Ground SP Ground FG magnetograph SOT/SP full scan Resolution for energy element ~ e (Dx)2
Detection limit and accuracy of magnetic field measurements -- rough comparison with ground-based observations -- Photon noise limited, FeI6302A line SOTセミナー@花山 2004.12.7
polarimeter response matrix CCD gain/dark I’’ = a I’+b ST Incident to polarimeter Polarization modulation S Incident Stokes vector I” CCD output I’ modulated intensity Telescope ST = TS I’ = W ST on-board demodulation Sraw SOT raw data Measurement error: DS S’ SOT product S” reduced Stokes vector dark/gain correction Polarimeter response matrix X : true matrix Xr: matrix used in calibration Ground calibration Xr-1S’ S” S’ = XS X : polarimeter response matrix
SOT polarization calibration before launch 2005.6 @Mitaka Heliostat mask window (I,Q,U,V) Sheet polarizer FPP Using well-calibrated sheet polarizers (linear & circular), the polarimeter response matrices, X, of SP and all wavelength of NFI were determined with an accuracy below. Accuracy: - 0.3333 0.3333 0.2500 0.0010 0.0500 0.0067 0.0050 0.0010 0.0067 0.0500 0.0050 0.0010 0.0067 0.0067 0.0500 DX < SOT is cross-talk free at e ~ 10-3 level Diagonal elements tell about the sensitivity of the SOT to Q,U,V
SP x matrices at scan center; CCD image each element is scaled to median + tolerance, x00 (=1) is replaced by I-image Median Mueller matrix Left 1.0000 0.2205 0.0187 -0.0047 0.0012 0.4813 0.0652 -0.0014 0.0001 0.0513 -0.4803 -0.0057 -0.0025 0.0032 -0.0046 0.5256 Right 1.0000 -0.2112 -0.0170 -0.0051 -0.0025 -0.4875 -0.0560 0.0022 -0.0001 -0.0426 0.4907 0.0060 0.0027 -0.0008 0.0042 -0.5301 The x matrix can be regarded as constant in the CCD.
Example of FG/NFI X matrix over the CCD, 5172 80x1024 left: theta= -1.571deg. 1.0000 -0.2994 -0.0336 -0.0435 0.0009 -0.4544 0.0208 0.0045 -0.0009 0.0287 0.4478 0.0068 -0.0085 0.0318 -0.0134 0.5774 right: theta= -4.441deg. 1.0000 -0.2871 -0.0305 -0.0434 -0.0003 -0.4473 0.0653 0.0038 -0.0007 0.0738 0.4435 0.0061 -0.0077 0.0310 -0.0150 0.5718
Detection limit of NFI for weak fields 1) Detection limit for circular and linear polarizations e is the photometric accuracy x33and x11 are diagonal elements of X 2) Polarization signals by Zeeman effect in a weak field Line profile convoluted with the tunable filter profile Difference of 2nd moments of s and p-components 3) Thus detection limit for magnetic fields are given by
SOT modulation profiles from the measured PMU retardance 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Q V U
Detection limit of FG for the weak magnetic fields, e = 0.001
How well can we retrieve the magnetic field from the products (IQUV) of the NFI? • NFI observables -- I(li), Q(li), U(li), V(li), i = 1,,, N • Physical quantities derived from the observables • -- B field strength (G), • g inclination (deg.), • c azimuth (deg), • S Doppler shift (mA) • fill factor =1 • Other quantities responsible for line formation are assumed to • be those in typical quiet sun. • An algorithm to derive the magnetic field from the NFI observables is tested. • The algorithm is based on the least square using model Stokes profiles calculated beforehand
I,Q,V Zeeman profiles against B Polarization degree Vpeak (g =0゜) I Qpeak (g =90゜) Q Peak wavelength V データ解析ワークショップ 2004.12.20-23
The method to derive the magnetic field vector from the NFI observables depends on the number of observed wavelength points. N = 1: 1-dimensional LUT for V/IBl, Q/I Bt individually N = 2: Rotate the frame to make U=0 (ignore MO effect) + search for the best fitting to model observable in (B, g, S) space N> 3: Initial guess with cos-fit algorithm + rotate the frame to make U~0 + search for the best fitting to model observable in (B, g, S) sub space • To test the performance of the algorithm, numerical simulations are made using ‘artificial sample observables’ (1000 sets) calculated with an atmospheric model with random physical parameters in a range of • 0 < B < 3000 G • 0 <g< 180 deg. • -90 <c< +90 deg. • -90 < S < +90 mA
N = 1 at dl = -80mA, Simulation result No Doppler info. Sample observable, 1000points
N = 2 at dl = [-80, 80] mA, simulation result alternative method: - ignoring MO effect - search entire (S, B, g ) space
N = 4 at dl = [-110, -70, 70,110] mA, simulation result Non-uniform wavelength sampling
Diagnostics using SP data slit Obtain magnetic field vectors and motions in solar atmosphere. Zeeman effect produces polarization in spectral lines
Stokes profiles fitting program - Milen-Eddington fitting for Hinode SP Data analysis session.. - SIR fitting programs SP data contains much more information on the structures of the solar atmosphere..