1 / 16

Economic integration in Latin America : where we stand

Economic integration in Latin America : where we stand. Roberto Bouzas Universidad de San Andrés-CONICET November 2009. Red de Investigaciones Económicas del Mercosur-REDMERCOSUR. Outline. A brief history The state of the game A changing external environment

eunice
Download Presentation

Economic integration in Latin America : where we stand

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Economicintegration in LatinAmerica: wherewe stand Roberto Bouzas Universidad de San Andrés-CONICET November 2009 Red de Investigaciones Económicas del Mercosur-REDMERCOSUR

  2. Outline • A briefhistory • Thestate of thegame • A changingexternalenvironment • Endogenousconstraintstodeeperintegration • Argentina and Brazil: a closer look • Conclusions

  3. A brief history • The “Grand Design”: regional integration as developmentpolicy • Big ambitions, modestresults (LAFTA, AG, CACM, CARIFTA) • Reasons: a) cross-country heterogeneity; b) externaleconomicenvironment; c) tensionsbetween local interests and collectiveneeds (Villanueva & Fuentes, 1989) • Crisis and transition: • Pragmatism and defensive responses • Scalingdownambitions (LAIA, Protocolo Modificatorio AC, bilateralism) • Regional integration as structuralreform • Economicintegration and tradeliberalization (Mercosur, North-South FTAs)

  4. The state of the game • Since 1965 thevastmajority (83%) of bilateral traderelations shows highertradeintensityindeces • A large share of tariffitems and exports are tradedtariff-free, and anevenhigher share willbetradedtariff-free by 2015 • Modestprogress in NTMs and non-borderissues • New regionalism has ledto a spaghettibowl • FTAsversusCUs: no longer a policyrelevant debate

  5. Thestateof thegame I 83% of LAIA bilateral trade relations have increased their trade intensity indeces, 1965-2005 Source: Author´s calculations based on COMTRADE Iij = (Xij/Xi)/(Mj/Mw-Mi)

  6. Thestateof thegame II Share of tariff-free trade (% of tariff items and % of exports), 2010 Concessions received by Source: LAIA

  7. Thestateof thegame III Share of tariff-free trade (% of tariff items and % of exports), 2014 Concessions received by Source: LAIA

  8. The state of the game IV …butmodestprogress in NTMs and a spaghettibowl Canada United States TLCAN Mexico R. Dominicana Guatemala El Salvador Honduras Nicaragua CACM Costa Rica Panama Venezuela Colombia Ecuador • Plus: • UNASUR • ALBA • PACIFIC ARC • …and therest of theworld ACN Brazil Peru Bolivia Paraguay Uruguay Chile MERCOSUR Argentina

  9. The state of the game V • In the 1990s therewas a strategiccompetitionbetween “models” of tradediscrimination • ButtheFTAsversusCUsissueis no longer a policyrelevant debate • FTAshavebecomethedominantmode of discrimination • Customunionshavenotdeepened. Indeed, theyhavedisintegratedor are in theprocess of doing so

  10. A changingexternalenvironment • North-South PTAs (US-sponsored “competitiveliberalization”) • Ideologicalenvironment: end of “neo-liberal convergence” (both in emerging and developedeconomies) • Emergence of China and thePacific: a new natural resource boom

  11. Endogenousconstraintstodeeperintegration • Constraintsonthedemandside: rising (trade) interdependence, butstilllow and asymmetric • Constraintsonthesupplyside (I): divergentinterests and unsustainabletrade-offs (heterogeneity) • Constraintsonthesupplyside (II): leadership gap (whosupplies regional publicgoods?)

  12. Argentina and Brazil: a closer look I Constraintsonthedemandside Rising (trade) interdependence, butstilllow and asymmetric: Source: Author´scalculationsbasedon BADACEL A new fact: raising FDI by Brazilian firms

  13. Argentina and Brazil: a closer look II Constraintsonthesupplyside I (heterogeneity) • Asymmetries have grown bigger (political economy) • Brazil´s more assertive offensive interests contrast with Argentina´s predominantly “defensive” agenda • “Paciencia estratégica” versus “compensation for the past” • Strategic focus versus old-style reindustrialization

  14. Argentina and Brazil: a closer look III Constraintsonthesupplyside II (leadership gap) • Brazil: “a leader without followers”? • Brazil: Dragging or pulling? • The private sector become the driver in agenda setting?

  15. Conclusions • Market integration healthier than institutions • Institutions increasingly politicized (an umbrella for heterogeneous interests) • The private sector will bend the agenda towards non-border issues, but tougher to deal with and more conflictive • The key to start to disentangle the spaghetti bowl is a few blocks away

  16. Thankyou!

More Related