270 likes | 376 Views
Between Filamentation and Two-Stream instabilities in e-beam/plasma interaction. A. Bret, M.-C. Firpo and C. Deutsch Laboratoire de Physique des Gaz et des Plasmas – Paris Orsay Université. Filamentation, Weibel. ?. k. Two-Stream. The problem of k -orientation. Beams. Formalism.
E N D
Between Filamentation and Two-Stream instabilities in e-beam/plasma interaction A. Bret, M.-C. Firpo and C. Deutsch Laboratoire de Physique des Gaz et des Plasmas – Paris Orsay Université
Filamentation, Weibel ? k Two-Stream The problem of k-orientation Beams
Formalism • Linear Maxwell-Relativistic Vlasov system in 3D • Collisionless – Fixed plasma ions • Analytical • Dielectic tensor e (k,w) non-diagonal • Det T(e, k) = 0 : proper frequencies • E along eigenvectors : gives angle (k,E)
Filamentation k ? k E Two-Stream The (k,E) angle
Dispersion Relation Det T(e, k) = 0 (w2eyy - k2c2)× [(w2exx - kz2c2)(w2ezz - kx2c2) - (w2exz + kxkzc2)2] = 0
Two Branches Branch 1 (w2eyy - k2c2) = 0 Branch 2 [(w2exx - kz2c2)(w2ezz - kx2c2) - (w2exz + kxkzc2)2] = 0
Model 1: T = 0 (Fluid) Beam : nbd(vx)d(vy)d(vz-Vb) Plasma : npd(vx)d(vy)d(vz+Vp) nbVb = npVp
Model 2: Hot Plasma Beam : nbd(vx)d(vy)d(vz-Vb) Plasma : npd(vz+Vp) × [Q(vx+Vt)+ Q(vx-Vt)] × [Q(vy+Vt)+ Q(vy-Vt)] nbVb = npVp 2Vt
Model 3: Hot Plasma + Relativistic Beam Beam : Relativistic energyE ~ 2 MeV (gb ~ 4) Plasma : Non relativisticT ~ 2 keV
k E // y Beam UNSTABLE Branch 1 behavior (w2eyy - k2c2) = 0 • Stable at T = 0 • Unstable T ≠ 0 for small angles • No relativistic effects (model 3 = model 2) • Purely transverse mode in ANY model • Original « Weibel » instability
qk k Weibel result Branch 1 behavior Z = kVb /wp Beam 103d d dRm Vtp/Vb r = Vtp/Vb, b=Vb/c
Branch 2 behavior • Yields unstable modes for all models and all angles • Bridge between Two-Stream and Filamentation [(w2exx - kz2c2)(... x k E Beam z
Between two-streamand filamentation, T=0 d/wp Beam Z = kVb /wp
Between two-streamand filamentation, T=0 d/wp Beam Z = kVb /wp
Between Two-Streamand filamentation, T≠0 d/wp Beam
Between Two-Streamand filamentation, T≠0 d/wp Beam
Tanf = 1+nb /np Vth /Vb fp/2 Vth0 Critical angle f Angle comes when 2 dispersion function singularities cross High Z instability just is just shifted in another direction
Between two-stream and filamentation, T≠0Relativistic effects d Beam
Same Angle Between two-stream and filamentation, T≠0Relativistic effects d Beam
Zxm = Vb/ c (Vth /Vb)1/2 Zxm 1 Highest Growth Rate f BEAM
Longitudinal approximation OK below f (k,E) angle f BEAM
df a1/3 /gb dp/2 (a/gb)1/2 dm d0 dp/2= df (a/gb)1/3 Growth Rates Scaling d a = nb/np b = Vb/c gb=(1-b2)-1/2
k Which effect ? Important effect k No effect Transverse Beam Temp. Effects Vtb Beam
Beam Temp. Effects 1+nb /np Tanf = (Vthb/gb+Vth)/Vb Beam Temp. damps growth rate beyond f
Beam Temp. damps instabilities beyond f. Longitudinal approximation fails beyond f. Longitudinal approximation even better with hot beam. Non relativistic beam Vtb=0 Vtb=Vb/30 Vtb=Vb/30 + k // E
Conclusion • Electromagnetic formalism • Exhaustive instabilities search • Weibel Branch • TSF Branch • TSF Branch: Two k-oblique effects • Critical angle f • Max. Growth Rate for oblique k (Vb~c) • Longi. Approx. Fails beyond f • Beam Temp. damps instabilities beyond f, not bellow • Maxwelian distribution, Collisions, Density gradient