140 likes | 147 Views
Learn about practices and strategies to address climate and market risks in vulnerable Andean ecosystems. Explore how assets and abilities impact resilience and recovery from shocks and stress.
E N D
LTR4: ADAPTING TO CHANGE IN THE ANDEAN HIGHLANDS Practices and Strategies to Address Climate and Market Risks in Vulnerable Ecosystems 2006-2007
Resilience or Trap: Assets and Ability to Recover from Shock and Stress Adaptation - Resilience Livelihoods Poverty Trap Time Ability to Recover is f (number & type of shocks; assets) About depletion of assets and poverty traps: Ellis; Zimmerman and Carter; Valdivia et al; de Waal and Tumushabe; Sheik; Sacks et al
The project’s five objectives: • Develop a shared understanding of the ecosystem drivers of change in Andean Ecosystems. • Measure the role of market and climate risks (objective and perceived) on livelihood strategies, and the role of assets on risk perceptions and strategies. Response to perceptions of the relative risks associated with these changes. • Explicitly link local and new knowledge to produce practices and information that provide alternatives to adapt to change • Evaluate and identify market integration opportunities and institutions that contribute to resilience. • Develop methods that integrate these knowledge systems, build capacities and capabilities to adapt to change – pathway that enables research impact
Overview of Activities Objective 1 Objective 2 Objective 3 Objective 5 Objective 4 Soil Fertility Quinoa Information Networks Local Forecasts IPCC projections Inter-learning Forages Soils Coalitions CPAs Mappings Stakeholders Synergies Out-scale Up-scale Advocacy Coalitions Group Approaches Inter-Learning KASAP Pathways Market Access Regional (MAPA) Gender Value Chains Credit Services Advocacy Coalition Crafts Risk Perceptions Vulnerability Mapping Risks Shocks Coping Communic. Baseline Livelihoods Markets Climatology Trends Local Soils Pests & Diseases Agro-Bio Land Use NNRR
Study Sites Vulnerable Populations High Regions in Tropics Multiple Shocks Climate Change Opportunities Site Selection Rationale Lake effects Rainfall Differences Elevation sites
ANCORAIMES -Four sites -3850-4300 -Transect -120-150Km - 480 mm
Umala -Four sites -3,770 - 4,070 -Plains and Hillsides -117-140 Km -450 mm
Intervention sites SANTA MARIA Peru APOPATA 3,900m 340 Has 60 Fam 400-600mm 4,400m 13,000Has 80 Fam Puno
Participatory Approaches to Understand Perceptions Risks, and Vulnerabilities
Participatory Maps – Chinchaya: Land Cover, Land Use Change, and Vulnerabilities BEFORE Erosion, Drought, Frost AFTER VULNERABILITY
HIGLIGHTS - PEOPLE • 12 Rural Communities • 450 households interviewed • 180 farmers participating in research groups • 350 farmers and researchers participated in CPAs • 200 in Field Days
Highlights Degree and Non Degree Training • Non degree: • Training of researchers: surveys, CPA, participatory methods, GIS (13 events) • Training of farmers: pests and diseases, management, repellents, management of forages (22 events) • Participatory assessments with farmer groups (27 activities) • Degree training: 27 students • 11 Licenciatura • 12 MS • 4 PhD • CIDES UNALM
Linkage Highlights Collaborating at Sites: • Puno: UNA, CIRNMA, CARITAS, SIERRA SUR • Ancoraimes: CIPCA, UNDP DDP, Municipality, Prefectura • Umala: ALTAGRO, PapaAndina Stakeholders Title II USAID; National Program of Climate Change; CIP- NRM ALTAGRO; Save the Children; CIDES; CIPCA; CIRNMA; Sierra Exportadora; PRONAMACHS • UNDP Small Donations Program ($30,000) • ALTAGRO CIP • National Program of Climate Change • Desarrollo Rural CIDES • Additional funds: • Brown, Fulbright, and Henry A Wallace - 53,500; • US National Center for Ecological Analysis andSynthesis -51K