160 likes | 238 Views
State-Local Chamber Relations. COSC/ASCP Conference September 17, 2012 Coeur d’Alene, ID. Just Because We’re on the Same Team. Doesn’t Mean We Always Get Along. So, what are the C haracteristics of a S trong , Productive State-Local Chamber Relationship?. What They’re Saying.
E N D
State-Local Chamber Relations COSC/ASCP Conference September 17, 2012 Coeur d’Alene, ID
So, what are the Characteristics of a Strong, Productive State-Local Chamber Relationship?
What They’re Saying • The state chamber works on so many issues, it would help if they identify the 3-4 that they most need local support and focus efforts there • Just because a local chamber is “small” doesn’t mean they’re staff aren’t professionals. • Our members need to know we are developing a state legislative agenda based on their, not simply stamping the state chamber • If I was the king of chamberworld, the state chamber would speak for all the local chambers at the statehouse. Unfortunately its not that easy.
What They’re Saying • If I ran a state chamber, I’d pull together the CEO’s/Chairs of the metro chambers 2-3 times per year to facilitate collaboration on the big issues. • When there isn’t alignment, acknowledge it and stick to the areas of agreement. • Local chambers carry some of the responsibility as well - they should actively working with the state chamber rather than waiting to hear the outcome. • Big investors understand our roles.
What I’m Hearing • On the whole, relations are pretty good… really! • Competition for dollars is not the biggest issue • Most frequent challenges center on public policy but stem from communications (or lack thereof).
And Size Does Matter • Metropolitan regional chambers often have their own lobbying horsepower and usually have well formed reasons when there is a difference of opinion. • Smaller community chambers with significant economic development often do too. • For big chambers, inclusion is more importance than ease.
Things are Peachy When… • There is mutual respect for ability and ability to influence. • Input is sought actively and early, particularly with metros. • Involvement is easy, particularly for small chambers • Focus is on the 85-90% in common.
Challenges Arise When… • Local chamber feels like an afterthought. • Agreement is assumed or implied • Lawmakers (or members) hear two different stories
So Ask Yourself… • Is your engagement with local chambers deliberate or afterthought? • Do you engage your coalition of local chambers only when you need help or throughout the year? • Do you spend as much time preparing for your chamber coalition meetings as you do for a policy committee? • Do you provide easy ways for a local chamber to get involved in a meaningful way. • Do local chambers believe their opinion matters?
If you were “them,” what would you want from the state chamber?
What would you like to tell anonymously local/metro chambers?