140 likes | 265 Views
Regression Analysis of Temporary Assistance for Needy Families/Aid to Families with Dependant Children for 1970-2004. By: Ryan Rafacz. Background On Welfare. Early welfare programs began in 1601 with the English Poor Law
E N D
Regression Analysis of Temporary Assistance for Needy Families/Aid to Families with Dependant Children for 1970-2004 By: Ryan Rafacz
Background On Welfare Early welfare programs began in 1601 with the English Poor Law Introduction of a welfare program in the United States after the Great Depression as part of Roosevelt’s “New Deal” President Clinton signed welfare reform into law in 1996.
Hypothesis A rise in unemployment and total number of recipients will cause upward pressure on welfare costs, while a rise in two-parent families will cause TANF expenditure to fall. See how this relates to time
Research Data The data is time series data from 1970-2004 The data collected for this regression came from the Department of Health and Human Services as well as the Bureau of Labor Statistics. http://aspe.hhs.gov/hsp/indicators06/apa.pdf http://www.bls.gov/cps/prev_yrs.htm
Theory • To test this hypothesis I collected data from my sources placed it in a table and ran a regression using excel hoping to get results supporting my hypothesis.
Equation Yt=B1+B2X2+B3X3+B4X4+B5t+ut Yt=TANF Expenditure X2=Total Recipients X3=Unemployment Rate X4=Two Parent Families t =Time Trend
Result Interpretation R2=.888 Significance F=7.224E-14 X2 – as total recipients rises by 1 TANF rises by about 1 X3 – as unemployment rises by 1 TANF decreases by about 97 X4 – as the number of two parent families receiving TANF rises by 1 TANF expenditure rises by about 21.5 t – shows over time with each year that passes TANF expenditure decreases by about 370
Things To Consider • 1st order autocorrelation • Due to using a time trend autocorrelation must be examined. • Using both a graph of the residuals as well as using the Durbin-Watson test.
Durbin-Watson Test • (Σ(et-et-1)2) = 210370576.8 • Σ(et2) = 141979723.4 • (Σ(et-et-1)2)/Σ(et2) = 1.481694511
Conclusion • Findings • There is a significant effect on welfare expenditure with a rising number of recipients and two-parent families, but over time we have a decreasing expenditure. • Further Reseach • Look at labor-force participation • Look at income of low-skilled workers • Effects of Welfare reform