220 likes | 357 Views
Telecommunications Industry Association TR-30.3/10-04-013 April 26-27, 2009. Over-the-Top Video Transport. Les Wu April 2010. 1. P2P Captures. P2P Capture Comparisons. Contributed p2p. Contributed p2p (15s integration). Voice Traffic. 2. TCP Delivery.
E N D
Telecommunications Industry Association TR-30.3/10-04-013 April 26-27, 2009
Over-the-Top Video Transport Les Wu April 2010
1 P2P Captures
2 TCP Delivery
Identical YT-HD Views (5s average) • 8-min HD view of Shuttle Landing • Run twice from home and once from lab
Network Utilization of NBCU Olympics Clip • 1s bandwidth averaging from the wireshark capture • TCP based transport • Bandwidth utilization appears greedy • Initial bandwidth spike of 27.7 Mbit! • Avg bitrate of 2.4Mbit has much higher excursions
3 Silverlight Lab Experiments
Silverlight Lab Capture Scenario • Big Buck Bunny Encoded via MS Expression Encoder 1080p standard profile • VC-1, 10 bitrates from 230k up to 6Mbit • Pristine 1GB Lab Network • Unconstrained, 10Mbit, 6.5Mbit, 4.5Mbit Policing with Aune Box • Policing done with a 250,000 byte Commited Burst Size (CBS) Buffer • Results: • Protocol appears greedy with massive bandwidth spikes • Even though 6Mbit claimed available, Silverlight did not appear to actually stream to that rate delivering 2-3 Mbit video!
Comparisons • Yellow: Streaming Bitrate • Green: Frame Rate • Red/Blue: Video Bitirate Ideal 10 Mbit 6.5 Mbit 4.5 Mbit
Silverlight Bandwidth Utilization (1s Averaging) – Detailed View