1 / 15

The Milgram Experiment

The Milgram Experiment. Obedience to Authority. Introduction. Stanley Milgram – Yale University psychologist Experiments began in July 1961 (Three months after the trial of Adolf Eichmann in Jerusalem)

farmstrong
Download Presentation

The Milgram Experiment

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. The Milgram Experiment Obedience to Authority

  2. Introduction • Stanley Milgram – Yale University psychologist • Experiments began in July 1961 (Three months after the trial of Adolf Eichmann in Jerusalem) • Milgram wanted to answer the question: “Could it be that Eichmann and his million accomplices in the Holocaust were just following orders? Could we call them all accomplices?”

  3. “The Architect of the Holocaust” Transportation Administrator to the Final Solution Managed all trains to transport Jews to ghettos and killing centers 1944 – Sent 430,000 Hungarians to gas chambers after the Final Solution was halted Fled to Argentina Captured in 1960 Hanged in 1962 Eichmann in Jerusalem court.

  4. The Experiment Roles • Three people take part in the experiment: “experimenter”, “learner” (“victim”) and “teacher” • The “experimenter” – a stern biology teacher dressed in a grey technician’s coat • The “learner” – a 47 year old actor • The “teacher” – volunteer told he was participating in an experiment in the study of memory and learning in different situations

  5. The Experiment Steps • 1. The actor and volunteer choose a slip of paper. • 2. Both slips say “teacher” ensuring the volunteer gets the right role • 3. The actor claims to have the “learner” slip and they separate into two rooms • 4. The “teacher” (volunteer) is given an electric shock as a sample of what the learner would receive • 5. The “teacher” is given a list of word pairs to teach the learner

  6. Public Announcement for Experiment

  7. The Experiment Steps Cont. • 6. The “teacher” read the word pairs to the “learner” • 7. The “teacher” then read the first word of each pair and gave four possible answers (the “learner” indicated his answer by pressing a button) • 8. If the answer was incorrect, the “teacher” was to administer an electric shock • The voltage would increase 15 volts for each wrong answer • If correct, the teacher would read the next word pair

  8. Experiment Diagram

  9. Electric Shock Apparatus & Volunteer

  10. The “Learner’s” Response • The “learner” never received the shocks • A tape recorder played prerecorded sounds of suffering for each shock level • After a number of voltage increases the actor would bang on the wall • After several times banging on the wall and complaining about a heart condition, he would stop responding (faking death)

  11. Ending the Experiment • If the “teacher” wanted to stop the experiment, the experimenter gave a succession of verbal prods: (1) Please continue. (2) The experiment requires that you continue. (3) It is absolutely essential that you continue. (4) You have no other choice, you must go on. • Experiment ended: (1) If the “teacher” wanted to stop after all four prods (2) After the teacher had given the max. 450 volt shock

  12. The “Teacher’s” Responses • Some test subjects paused after 135 volts and questioned experiment • Some desired to check on the “learner” • Most continued after they were assured they would not be held responsible • Few subjects began to laugh nervously and show extreme signs of stress

  13. Percentage Results Poll Before Experiment Actual Results • Fourteen Yale senior-year psych majors polled • Few (average 1.2%) of volunteers would inflict maximum voltage • First set of experiments at Yale – 65% (26 of 40) inflicted the maximum voltage • Experiment repeated around the world – 61-66%

  14. Other Results • None of volunteers who refused to administer final shocks insisted that the experiment itself be terminated • None left the room to check the health of the victim • Experiment raised questions about the ethics of scientific experimentation • 84% of former volunteers were “glad” to have participated

  15. Journal • 1. Do you believe that the Milgram experiment was ethical? • 2. Were you surprised by the results? • 3. Can you better understand how and why Germans and others did not do more to stop the Holocaust? Do you believe that those that did not help the Jews were accomplices to the Final Solution?

More Related