340 likes | 588 Views
Presentation Overview. Review examples of Infectious diseases related to environmental health in the US Mexico Border regionDiscuss relevance to security issuesEconomic impactHuman health and potential for bioterrorismWhat actions can public health/CDC take o address food safetyResearch, info
E N D
1. Working Together to Address Human Health and Food Safety Concerns Miguel A. Escobedo, MD, MPH
Medical Officer
El Paso CDC Quarantine Station
2. Presentation Overview Review examples of Infectious diseases related to environmental health in the US Mexico Border region
Discuss relevance to security issues
Economic impact
Human health and potential for bioterrorism
What actions can public health/CDC take o address food safety
Research, information sharing
Discuss public health impact and economic impact
3. Border Infectious Diseases related to the environment Food borne
Hepatitis A, Hepatitis E
Salmonella
Listeria, Brucellois
Mycobacterium bovis
Vector borne
Dengue and West Nile Virus
Zoonotic
Pandemic & Avian Influenza
Rabies
Parasitic
Cystocircosis
Giardiasis and Amebiasis
4. Cross-Border Infectious Disease Principles Disease agents do not respect borders
US-MX border is one community for Public Health Purposes
Extensive economic, family, socio-cultural ties
Approximately 1.2 million daily border crossings in to U.S.
Certain foods can only be acquired in Mexico
US and MX have unique food safety systems in place
We never point the finger at the other side
5. Pandemic / Avian Influenza Three players
Seasonal influenza, yearly world wide outbreaks
Avian Influenza due to HP H5N1 is global concern with a huge economic impact
Pandemic Human Influenza is a global threat with enormous human health and security concerns.
The Security and Prosperity Partnership Agreement for North America has focuses on joint pandemic influenza preparedness.
6. Very importantly, preparedness and understanding of each is needed to enhance preparedness and understanding of all forms of influenza. A recurring theme in this training will be that a strong seasonal influenza surveillance and response system will serve the purposes of pandemic preparedness, and vice-versa.Very importantly, preparedness and understanding of each is needed to enhance preparedness and understanding of all forms of influenza. A recurring theme in this training will be that a strong seasonal influenza surveillance and response system will serve the purposes of pandemic preparedness, and vice-versa.
7. Avian Influenza Type A influenza
Endemic in birds
H5, H7 subtypes can cause serious disease or death in wild birds; often cause death in poultry
Virus in saliva and feces of wild birds and poultry can be directly transmitted to humans and other animals
Can contaminate clothing, equipment, water, feed
Currently, scientists believe that a pandemic strain of influenza is most likely to develop from an avian Influenza type A virus, such as the H5N1 strain that is currently circulating in birds through much of the world. Avian Influenza A viruses differ from human Influenza A viruses in several respects. All type A viruses can infect birds and many do infect birds without causing any disease. However, certain subtypes (H5 and H7) are deadly to many species of birdsespecially domestic poultry. Infected birds excrete large amounts of virus in respiratory secretions, saliva, and feces. Avian viruses may be transmitted to humans and other animals through contact with respiratory secretions and feces. These viruses may survive at low temperatures, at low humidity, and in water for days to weeks. Other modes of transmission including contamination of clothing, farm equipment, water, and feed are possible. Currently, scientists believe that a pandemic strain of influenza is most likely to develop from an avian Influenza type A virus, such as the H5N1 strain that is currently circulating in birds through much of the world. Avian Influenza A viruses differ from human Influenza A viruses in several respects. All type A viruses can infect birds and many do infect birds without causing any disease. However, certain subtypes (H5 and H7) are deadly to many species of birdsespecially domestic poultry. Infected birds excrete large amounts of virus in respiratory secretions, saliva, and feces. Avian viruses may be transmitted to humans and other animals through contact with respiratory secretions and feces. These viruses may survive at low temperatures, at low humidity, and in water for days to weeks. Other modes of transmission including contamination of clothing, farm equipment, water, and feed are possible.
8. H5N1 Possible Travel Routes Legal poultry business
Illegal bird trade
Untreated fertilizer
Migrating birds
Humans (contaminated objects)
There are many suggested theories for how the avian influenza H5N1 virus can spread throughout the world. Both the legal and the illegal poultry trade may contribute to the spread by the movement of poultry and other birds sick with avian influenza H5N1 across borders. The widespread use of untreated poultry feces as a fertilizer is another possible risk factor. Migrating birds also appear to be a means of virus spread since ducks and other migratory fowl can be infected without illness. Humans may also play a direct role in the movement of avian influenza H5N1 virus through contamination on clothes or farm equipment.
There are many suggested theories for how the avian influenza H5N1 virus can spread throughout the world. Both the legal and the illegal poultry trade may contribute to the spread by the movement of poultry and other birds sick with avian influenza H5N1 across borders. The widespread use of untreated poultry feces as a fertilizer is another possible risk factor. Migrating birds also appear to be a means of virus spread since ducks and other migratory fowl can be infected without illness. Humans may also play a direct role in the movement of avian influenza H5N1 virus through contamination on clothes or farm equipment.
9. Cause for Concern Avian influenza can have a large impact on poultry
Can cause high mortality
Significant economic impact
Rarely, avian influenza can cause illness in humans
Avian influenza viruses can serve as source of next pandemic strain In the past few years, increased attention has been paid by public health officials and the media to avian influenza. Avian influenza can have a large impact on poultry and can cause high mortality in poultry flocks producing significant economic impact and loss of a valuable food source. Rarely, avian influenza can cause illness in humans and because of this, avian influenza viruses could serve as a source of next pandemic influenza strain.
In the past few years, increased attention has been paid by public health officials and the media to avian influenza. Avian influenza can have a large impact on poultry and can cause high mortality in poultry flocks producing significant economic impact and loss of a valuable food source. Rarely, avian influenza can cause illness in humans and because of this, avian influenza viruses could serve as a source of next pandemic influenza strain.
10. H5N1 Avian Influenza Currently spreading through Asia, Africa, Europe, Middle East
Can be highly lethal to domestic poultry and other animal species
Virus of greatest concern for pandemic potential, but other viruses in animals also of concern\
Humans can become infected with avian influenza viruses
Usually through exposure to infected domestic poultry that have become infected with wild bird avian viruses
Avian influenza A (H5N1) is currently spreading through Asia, Africa, Europe, Middle East. More will be discussed on the nomenclature H5N1 later in this module.
Avian influenza A (H5N1) can be highly lethal to domestic poultry and other animal species and produces occasional human cases but no efficient human to human transmission.
While this is the virus that is of greatest concern for pandemic potential, there are other viruses in animals that are also of concern.
Avian influenza A (H5N1) is currently spreading through Asia, Africa, Europe, Middle East. More will be discussed on the nomenclature H5N1 later in this module.
Avian influenza A (H5N1) can be highly lethal to domestic poultry and other animal species and produces occasional human cases but no efficient human to human transmission.
While this is the virus that is of greatest concern for pandemic potential, there are other viruses in animals that are also of concern.
11. Clinical illness with H5N1 compared with typical human influenza illness More severe illness in younger persons
Primary viral pneumonia appears to be more common and with rapid onset
Incubation period may be longer
Duration of infectious period likely longer, particularly among adults In comparison with seasonal influenza, human infection with avian influenza A (H5N1) results in more severe illness in younger persons. Primary viral pneumonia appears to be more common and with rapid onset. The incubation period may be longer and the duration of the infectious period likely longer, particularly among adults.
In comparison with seasonal influenza, human infection with avian influenza A (H5N1) results in more severe illness in younger persons. Primary viral pneumonia appears to be more common and with rapid onset. The incubation period may be longer and the duration of the infectious period likely longer, particularly among adults.
12. Queso Fresco and Salmonella on the California/Mexico Border Ill present two binational outbreak investigations which conformed reasonably closely to the US Mexico Guidelines. The first is an outbreak of Salmonella typhimurium associated with queso fresco in Imperial County and Mexicali.
Good morning. Ill be speaking about queso fresco, which translates fresh cheese in Spanish, that is Mexican style cheese which is frequently consumed unpasteurized, and its associated infectious disease health risks focusing on two recent Salmonella outbreaks in the California border Latino population. Ill present two binational outbreak investigations which conformed reasonably closely to the US Mexico Guidelines. The first is an outbreak of Salmonella typhimurium associated with queso fresco in Imperial County and Mexicali.
Good morning. Ill be speaking about queso fresco, which translates fresh cheese in Spanish, that is Mexican style cheese which is frequently consumed unpasteurized, and its associated infectious disease health risks focusing on two recent Salmonella outbreaks in the California border Latino population.
13. Queso Fresco Associated Diseases Salmonella
S. Typhimurium DT 104 Yakima, Washington, 1999
S. Typhimurium San Diego 2004
S. Typhimurium Imperial County 2005
Brucellosis
Highest rates in Hispanics
US Mexico border counties relative risk > 8
Listeria
Los Angeles 1985
North Carolina 2000
Texas 2003
Emerging Infections Food Net surveillance higher rates in Hispanic infants
M. bovis
New York City outbreak 2001-2004
San Diego County
A series of outbreaks cause by a variety of organisms associated with consumption of raw Mexican style cheese or queso fresco have been reported. All of these organisms, salmonella, brucellosis, listeria, and Mycobacterium bovis are associated with cattle or goats. Ill speak later on the outbreak of salmonella in Imperial County.
Brucellosis is another sometimes difficult to diagnose serious systemic infection often causing hospitalizations.
Listeria monocytogenes infections are associated with high rates of hospitalization and death. Perinatal listeria infection can cause spontaneous abortion, premature delivery and neonatal infection.
New York City detected 35 cases (97% Hispanic) of M. bovis between 2001 and 2004 including a fatal case in a 15 month old. 10% of Mexican born TB cases in NYC are due to M. bovis, and a similar proportion of San Diego Countys TB cases are due to M. bovis.
Id like to start my presentation by giving an overview of queso fresco cheese associated disease morbidity among Latinos not only on the US Mexico border but also among Latino immigrants throughout the US.
Raw Mexican cheese has been connected to outbreaks and sporadic infections among Latinos in the US from a number of etiologic agents in recent years. In addition to the two outbreaks Ill be presenting, a Salmonella typhimurium outbreak with a virulent strain was documented in Washington state in 1999.
In a review of national notifiable disease surveillance data in the 1990s, brucellosis rates in US border counties were over 8 times higher than rates in non-border states. (The Mexican state of Baja California experienced in 1995 an outbreak involving about 500 cases of Brucella melitensis infections associated with consumption unpasteurized goat milk and cheese.)
A notorious outbreak of perinatal listeria took place in Los Angeles in 1985. This outbreak raised awareness in the US of listeria as a foodborne disease associated with Mexican style cheese. The vehicle in Los Angeles was a contaminated commercial product made in Los Angeles County.
An outbreak of listeria among Latinos in North Carolina in 2000 was traced to local production of queso fresco from unpasteurized milk. A smaller similar outbreak was picked up by Pulsenet molecular epidemiology testing in Texas in 2003.
While the incidence of perinatal listeriosis declined from 104 to 29 per 100,000 from 1996-2003, higher rates of listeria persist among Hispanic infants in CDC Emerging Infection Program surveillance data.
San Diego County has consistently found that about 7% of its TB cases (roughly 20 cases/year) are due to M. bovis and not M. TB. M. bovis in Latinos in the US is ultimately related to imperfect control of M. bovis in Mexican cattle populationsA series of outbreaks cause by a variety of organisms associated with consumption of raw Mexican style cheese or queso fresco have been reported. All of these organisms, salmonella, brucellosis, listeria, and Mycobacterium bovis are associated with cattle or goats. Ill speak later on the outbreak of salmonella in Imperial County.
Brucellosis is another sometimes difficult to diagnose serious systemic infection often causing hospitalizations.
Listeria monocytogenes infections are associated with high rates of hospitalization and death. Perinatal listeria infection can cause spontaneous abortion, premature delivery and neonatal infection.
New York City detected 35 cases (97% Hispanic) of M. bovis between 2001 and 2004 including a fatal case in a 15 month old. 10% of Mexican born TB cases in NYC are due to M. bovis, and a similar proportion of San Diego Countys TB cases are due to M. bovis.
Id like to start my presentation by giving an overview of queso fresco cheese associated disease morbidity among Latinos not only on the US Mexico border but also among Latino immigrants throughout the US.
Raw Mexican cheese has been connected to outbreaks and sporadic infections among Latinos in the US from a number of etiologic agents in recent years. In addition to the two outbreaks Ill be presenting, a Salmonella typhimurium outbreak with a virulent strain was documented in Washington state in 1999.
In a review of national notifiable disease surveillance data in the 1990s, brucellosis rates in US border counties were over 8 times higher than rates in non-border states. (The Mexican state of Baja California experienced in 1995 an outbreak involving about 500 cases of Brucella melitensis infections associated with consumption unpasteurized goat milk and cheese.)
A notorious outbreak of perinatal listeria took place in Los Angeles in 1985. This outbreak raised awareness in the US of listeria as a foodborne disease associated with Mexican style cheese. The vehicle in Los Angeles was a contaminated commercial product made in Los Angeles County.
An outbreak of listeria among Latinos in North Carolina in 2000 was traced to local production of queso fresco from unpasteurized milk. A smaller similar outbreak was picked up by Pulsenet molecular epidemiology testing in Texas in 2003.
While the incidence of perinatal listeriosis declined from 104 to 29 per 100,000 from 1996-2003, higher rates of listeria persist among Hispanic infants in CDC Emerging Infection Program surveillance data.
San Diego County has consistently found that about 7% of its TB cases (roughly 20 cases/year) are due to M. bovis and not M. TB. M. bovis in Latinos in the US is ultimately related to imperfect control of M. bovis in Mexican cattle populations
14. Epidemiologic Investigation Imperial County 43 cases of gastrointestinal illness identified with onset dates during August 12--October 19, 2005.
21 Imperial County residents met confirmed case definition.
22 met the suspect case definition (epidemiologically linked). Imperial County, the CA county bordering Mexico immediately to the east of San Diego, identified an outbreak of gastrointestinal illness with 21 positive cultures for Salmonella typhi in late summer 2005. The culture confirmed cases had a new characteristic Pulse Field Gel Electrophoresis (PFGE) pattern. An additional 22 suspect cases had gastrointestinal illness during Aug-October and were epidemiologically linked to the culture positive cases.
Confirmed case = person with culture-confirmed ST with a pulsed field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) pattern matching outbreak pattern by at least one enzyme, and GI onset between Aug-Oct 2005, and hx or QF consumption prior to illness.
Suspect case = person with GI with onset between Aug 12 and Oct 19, 2005, and hx of QF consumption one week prior to illness onset. Imperial County, the CA county bordering Mexico immediately to the east of San Diego, identified an outbreak of gastrointestinal illness with 21 positive cultures for Salmonella typhi in late summer 2005. The culture confirmed cases had a new characteristic Pulse Field Gel Electrophoresis (PFGE) pattern. An additional 22 suspect cases had gastrointestinal illness during Aug-October and were epidemiologically linked to the culture positive cases.
Confirmed case = person with culture-confirmed ST with a pulsed field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) pattern matching outbreak pattern by at least one enzyme, and GI onset between Aug-Oct 2005, and hx or QF consumption prior to illness.
Suspect case = person with GI with onset between Aug 12 and Oct 19, 2005, and hx of QF consumption one week prior to illness onset.
15. Imperial County Outbreak: Summary Imperial County cases ranged from 3 79 years of age. All were Latino. 14% of cases were hospitalized. The majority of the cases had consumed queso fresco. A case control study was not performed. Imperial County cases ranged from 3 79 years of age. All were Latino. 14% of cases were hospitalized. The majority of the cases had consumed queso fresco. A case control study was not performed.
16. Epidemiologic InvestigationImperial County & Mexicali Imperial County became aware that its sister jurisdiction across the border in Mexicali, Baja Californias capital city, was experiencing simultaneously a large outbreak of gastroenteritis associated with purchase of queso fresco from a supermarket. The two jurisdictions worked together to combine their data into this single epidemiologic curve. Imperial County became aware that its sister jurisdiction across the border in Mexicali, Baja Californias capital city, was experiencing simultaneously a large outbreak of gastroenteritis associated with purchase of queso fresco from a supermarket. The two jurisdictions worked together to combine their data into this single epidemiologic curve.
17. This slide is from a simlar outbreak investigation one year before in San Diego County showing street vendors who sold non-commercially packaged cheese often stored inadequately. This slide is from a simlar outbreak investigation one year before in San Diego County showing street vendors who sold non-commercially packaged cheese often stored inadequately.
18. This is a small cheese producing unit which makes pasteured queso fresco in Mexico taken by a California Department of Food and Agriculture veterinarian who works collaboratively with agricultural officials in Mexico. This is a small cheese producing unit which makes pasteured queso fresco in Mexico taken by a California Department of Food and Agriculture veterinarian who works collaboratively with agricultural officials in Mexico.
19. Port of Entry Results 94% (n=203) samples alk phos pos
13% pos for Salmonella species
PFGE pattern indistinguishable from San Diego outbreak strain Q2
4% Listeria sp.
M. bovis in one sample
The next three slides are not part of the Imperial County/Mexicali salmonella typhymurium investigation, but demonstrate the type of work that could be made even more powerful with binational collaboration. A special survey of cheese done at the San Ysidro port of entry revealed that that 95% of the samples were determined to be unpasteurized by alkaline phosphatase testing. 13% were positive for various species of Salmonella including an isolate with the San Diego Q2 PFGE outbreak strain. 4% of samples were positive for Listeria species and one sample was positive for Mycobacterium bovis at FDAs laboratory. The next three slides are not part of the Imperial County/Mexicali salmonella typhymurium investigation, but demonstrate the type of work that could be made even more powerful with binational collaboration. A special survey of cheese done at the San Ysidro port of entry revealed that that 95% of the samples were determined to be unpasteurized by alkaline phosphatase testing. 13% were positive for various species of Salmonella including an isolate with the San Diego Q2 PFGE outbreak strain. 4% of samples were positive for Listeria species and one sample was positive for Mycobacterium bovis at FDAs laboratory.
20. 99% received prenatal care for current or most recent pregnancy
Only 1 pregnant woman reported that she was told during a prenatal care visit not to eat queso fresco Women Infant Children (WIC) Survey in Los Angeles A survey in Los Angeles federal Woman, Infant, and Children clinics confirmed that queso fresco is a highly popular food item among Latinos, consumed in this survey by 83% of the women. However, most did not know whether the cheese they eat is pasteurized or unpasteurized, and only 1 pregnant woman reported she was told during her prenatal care not to eat queso fresco. A survey in Los Angeles federal Woman, Infant, and Children clinics confirmed that queso fresco is a highly popular food item among Latinos, consumed in this survey by 83% of the women. However, most did not know whether the cheese they eat is pasteurized or unpasteurized, and only 1 pregnant woman reported she was told during her prenatal care not to eat queso fresco.
21. Brochure Provides detailed information
Risks of eating queso fresco
How to choose safe queso fresco
Safe alternatives to queso fresco during pregnancy
Spanish/English The California Department of Health Services developed a Spanish brochure based on the feedback from these Latina women to provide information on the risks of queso fresco and how to avoid unsafe unpasteurized cheese. The California Department of Health Services developed a Spanish brochure based on the feedback from these Latina women to provide information on the risks of queso fresco and how to avoid unsafe unpasteurized cheese.
22. Dengue Fever on the Mexico-U.S. Border The second example of a binational outbreak investigation is the dengue fever investigation done in Laredo and Nuevo Laredo in 1999. In 2005, a more serious outbreak of dengue hemorrhagic fever outbreak occurred in the sister cities of Brownsville and Matamoros, also in South Texas. The second example of a binational outbreak investigation is the dengue fever investigation done in Laredo and Nuevo Laredo in 1999. In 2005, a more serious outbreak of dengue hemorrhagic fever outbreak occurred in the sister cities of Brownsville and Matamoros, also in South Texas.
23. Aedes aegypti
Primarily a daytime feeder
Lives around human habitation
Lays eggs and produces larvae in artificial containers Dengue is transmitted by Aedes aegypti mosquitoes. Dengue is transmitted by Aedes aegypti mosquitoes.
24. Aedes aegypti distribution has increased dramatically since the breakdown of once successful mosquito control programs in the Americas. Aedes aegypti distribution has increased dramatically since the breakdown of once successful mosquito control programs in the Americas.
25. Household Survey 622 household surveys
313 in Nuevo Laredo
309 in Laredo
516 blood samples
288 from Nuevo Laredo residents
228 from Laredo residents
622 houses were surveyed over a 2-week period in early September, 313 in Nuevo Laredo and 309 in Laredo, by binational teams. 516 blood samples were obtained, 288 from Nuevo Laredo residents and 228 from Laredo residents.622 houses were surveyed over a 2-week period in early September, 313 in Nuevo Laredo and 309 in Laredo, by binational teams. 516 blood samples were obtained, 288 from Nuevo Laredo residents and 228 from Laredo residents.
26. Seroprevalence Estimates Antibody Mexico(%) U.S.(%)
IgM 16.0 1.3
95% CI (0.90-22.2) (0-2.8)
IgG 47.8 22.5
95% CI (41.0-54.5) (17.0-28.0)
The results of the laboratory analysis reveal the difference in dengue transmission between the two cities. IgM antibodies, indicating exposure to dengue sometime during the last 3 months, were found in 16% of Mexican residents tested, compared to 1.3% of U.S. residents. IgG antibodies, indicating dengue exposure sometime in the past, were found in almost 48% of Mexican residents, compared to 23% of U.S. residents.The results of the laboratory analysis reveal the difference in dengue transmission between the two cities. IgM antibodies, indicating exposure to dengue sometime during the last 3 months, were found in 16% of Mexican residents tested, compared to 1.3% of U.S. residents. IgG antibodies, indicating dengue exposure sometime in the past, were found in almost 48% of Mexican residents, compared to 23% of U.S. residents.
27. Mosquito Larvae Results Mexico U.S.
House Index 25% 37%
Breteau Index 38 91
Surveying yards and patios for the presence of mosquito larvae revealed that Aedes aegypti larvae were prevalent in both cities. The house index, the percentage of houses examined which had larvae present, was higher in the U.S. than in Mexico. Likewise, the Breteau index, which is the number of containers with larvae in them per 100 houses examined, was also higher in the U.S. than in Mexico. These differences are believed to be due to an intensive clean-up campaign by the Tamaulipas Secretariat of Health in Mexico during the dengue outbreak.Surveying yards and patios for the presence of mosquito larvae revealed that Aedes aegypti larvae were prevalent in both cities. The house index, the percentage of houses examined which had larvae present, was higher in the U.S. than in Mexico. Likewise, the Breteau index, which is the number of containers with larvae in them per 100 houses examined, was also higher in the U.S. than in Mexico. These differences are believed to be due to an intensive clean-up campaign by the Tamaulipas Secretariat of Health in Mexico during the dengue outbreak.
28. WNV Human Cases, US and Mexico 2006
29. Distribution of Coccidioides spp. in U.S. and Mexico
31. Acute Hepatitis A Cases*, by Country and Year, BIDS Project 2000 - 2006
32. Number of Hepatitis A, by age and year in El Paso, TX, 1990-2006
33. Hepatitis A risk factors*, U.S. and Mexico U.S. risk factors
Border crossing,** frequency and duration of crossing
Contact with a suspected hepatitis case
Mexico risk factors
Municipal water vs bottled***
*Univariate analysis
** Rel. risk 3.6 (95% C.I., 1.8, 7.2)
*** Rel. risk 1.8 (95% C.I., 1.5, 2.3)
We compared BIDS patients with positive tests for Hep A IgM with patients that were negative for all serologic viral hepatitis testing. The number of negative controls obtained in this way were 215, 114 from Mexico and 111 from the U.S. Some of these negative controls had other non viral hepatitis diagnoses and some were of unknown etiology. It is possible that a small proportion of the controls were misclassified as viral serologic testing is not 100% sensitive and the timing of the sample can affect results. While this analysis is ongoing we did identify border crossing as a statistically significant risk factor for hepatitis A infection among U.S. patients. This finding was also apparent as a trend when looking at frequency and duration of border crossing. Contact with a suspected hepatitis case was a strong risk factor on the U.S. side but contact was not a statistically significant risk factor for Mexican patients. For Mexican patients, using municipal drinking water compared to bottled water as a main water source was a significant risk factor. Use of municipal water is probably correlated with lower socioeconomic status and so this other risk factor findings need to be corroborated with controlled multivariate analysis.
We compared BIDS patients with positive tests for Hep A IgM with patients that were negative for all serologic viral hepatitis testing. The number of negative controls obtained in this way were 215, 114 from Mexico and 111 from the U.S. Some of these negative controls had other non viral hepatitis diagnoses and some were of unknown etiology. It is possible that a small proportion of the controls were misclassified as viral serologic testing is not 100% sensitive and the timing of the sample can affect results. While this analysis is ongoing we did identify border crossing as a statistically significant risk factor for hepatitis A infection among U.S. patients. This finding was also apparent as a trend when looking at frequency and duration of border crossing. Contact with a suspected hepatitis case was a strong risk factor on the U.S. side but contact was not a statistically significant risk factor for Mexican patients. For Mexican patients, using municipal drinking water compared to bottled water as a main water source was a significant risk factor. Use of municipal water is probably correlated with lower socioeconomic status and so this other risk factor findings need to be corroborated with controlled multivariate analysis.
35. Thank you y muchas graciasQuestions?