1 / 8

Z39.50 and the DNER

Z39.50 and the DNER. Paul Miller Interoperability Focus UK Office for Library & Information Networking (UKOLN) P.Miller@ukoln.ac.uk http://www.ukoln.ac.uk/.

fauna
Download Presentation

Z39.50 and the DNER

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Z39.50 and the DNER Paul Miller Interoperability Focus UK Office for Library & Information Networking (UKOLN) P.Miller@ukoln.ac.uk http://www.ukoln.ac.uk/ UKOLN is funded by the Library and Information Commission, the Joint Information Systems Committee (JISC) of the Higher Education Funding Councils, as well as by project funding from the JISC and the European Union. UKOLN also receives support from the University of Bath where it is based.

  2. Introducing Z39.50 • North American Standard (ANSI/NISO Z39.50–1995 [version 3]) • International Standard (ISO 23950) • Originally library–centric • Permits remote searching of databases • Access via Z client or over web • Relies upon ‘Profiles’ • CIMI profile for cultural heritage • GEO profile for Geospatial data. See http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue21/

  3. Z39.50 Challenges • Profiles for each discipline • Defeats interoperability? • Vendor interpretation of the standard • Bib–1 bloat • Largely invisible to the user • Seen as complicated • Seen as expensive • Seen as old–fashioned • Surely no match for XML/RDF/ whatever.

  4. Z39.50 and the DNER • Z39.50 already deployed within JISC services • Significant investment • Growing expertise • Plenty of technologies that claim/manage to do bits of Z39.50 better • Few people are crazy enough to admit to liking Z39.50 • Arguably no real alternative yet, though.

  5. Z39.50 and the DNER • But… • Too much difference in interpretation • Too many areas of inconsistency • Profiles • Record syntaxes • ‘default’ behaviours • All of which makes user–centric interaction with the DNER difficult today.

  6. Empowering the DNER • Solution… • Recognise the importance of local interfaces, disciplinary profiles, etc. • As an alternative, offer a single ‘DNER Profile’ • Enables basic cross–search across all/most services • Imposes control upon vendor interpretation • Compliant with international efforts, driving DNER  DINER.

  7. The DNER Profile • Likely to be based upon the Texas Profile • Drawing together expertise behind a number of area profiles • Texas, MODELS, vCUC, ONE… • Meeting at Stockholm ZIG (mid August) • Ten people meeting in Bath after ZIG to write draft See http://www.unt.edu/wmoen/ZILSReviewZTexasProfile10May99.htm See http://www.tsl.texas.gov/LD/z3950/TZIGProfile99Apr20.htm

  8. The DNER Profile – input • Profile being developed to meet a range of international needs, primarily in the library sector. • To make this work for you, we want your input… • Join ZIP–PIZ–L list • LISTSERV@INFOSERV.NLC-BNC.CA • SUBSCRIBE ZIP-PIZ-L Firstname Lastname • Comment on Texas Profile to me or Bill Moen before 10 August • Comment on ideas at the ZIG • Comment on draft profile during late August. See http://www.tsl.texas.gov/LD/z3950/TZIGProfile99Apr20.htm

More Related