180 likes | 325 Views
Modelling Magma Intrusion into an Underground Opening. Presentation to VOLCANIC ERUPTION MECHANISM MODELING WORKSHOP November 14-16, 2002 University of Hew Hampshire Durham, NH 03824, USA. Ed Gaffney and Rick Rauenzahn Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, NM 87545, USA.
E N D
Modelling Magma Intrusion into an Underground Opening Presentation to VOLCANIC ERUPTION MECHANISM MODELING WORKSHOP November 14-16, 2002 University of Hew Hampshire Durham, NH 03824, USA Ed Gaffney and Rick Rauenzahn Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, NM 87545, USA
Modelling Magma Intrusion into an Underground Opening • Context of Yucca Mountain(Ed) • Geologic Setting • Repository Requirements • Potential Igneous Events • Goals of Modelling • CFDLIB(Rick) • Background and Basics • Version 02.1 • Volatile exsolution • Variable viscosity • Early results(Ed) • Initial Interactions • Effusive Flow
Context of Yucca Mountain Geologic Setting • Fault block in rhyolitic tuff sequence • Tertiary • Water table ~600 m,repository ~300 m • Pliocene to Pleistocene basaltic eruptions • Closest (Lathrop Wells Cone) is 75 ka • ~0.15 km3 • Alkali basalt, 2-4 wt/o water
Context of Yucca Mountain Repository Requirements • Exposure of target population • Over 10,000 year span • Potential hazards • Ground water seepage • Damage to waste packages from seismic activity • Volcanic intrusion
Context of Yucca Mountain Potential Igneous Events • Unlikely (10-8 per year) • Intrusive/extrusive event similar to Lathrop wells • alkali basalt • 1-4% (wt) H2O • ~0.1 km3 • Dike intersects drifts, damages waste packages • gas corrosion • heat effects on integrity • Impact, drag • May erupt to surface • fissure, conduit, or dogleg
Context of Yucca Mountain Goals of Modelling • Determine environment seen by waste packages • Is there a shock from first eruption into drift? • Will magma fill drift? • Size and velocity of projectiles? • Peak environments (P, T, u, dynamic pressure) along drift • “Final” environments • Evaluate mechanisms for release • Impacts of bombs, other fragments • Heating internal gas P rises rupture • Drag effects (carried to surface, torn by diff. drag forces, ...)
CFDLIB Background • Multiphase compressible and incompressible flows • 10 years in development • Test bed for models • Applications in industry, defense • Collocated (cell-centered) variables • Fluxing velocities are time-space advanced with pressure correction • ICE/MAC • Pressure waves treated implicitly (relax SS Courant condition) • Advection/viscosity explicit • General EOS, multiphase exchange laws (user)
CFDLIB Background (cont’d) • Particle-in-cell method • Allows mixed Lagrangian/Eulerian treatment • State variables (m, U, x, , …) kept on particles that move with interpolated velocity • Fluid/structure interaction (history-dependent stress laws) • Example with rod penetrator
CFDLIB Background YMP special needs • Vapor/magma equilibrium • Papale (1997, 1999) • Include air (extend K/J EOS by assuming ideal air) • Variable (high) viscosity • Implicit treatment • Model of Shaw (1972) • Generalized effective drag/heat transfer • Particle size/coefficients as f(k,Tk,...) • Equations of state for gas (BKW) and liquid(Us-Up)
Early ResultsGas Jet A 20 bar gas jet expands into an atmosphere
Conclusions • Goal: model magma drift interaction • CFDLIB is multifluid, multiphase code • Mixed Lagrangian/Eulerian facilitates fluid-structure interaction • Implicit treatment of pressure waves • User supplied equation of state and exchange laws • Volatile equilibrium with silicate liquid like Papale but with different equation of state • Variable (high) viscosity • Work has just begun and team is small • magma expansion into drift • effusive flow in drift (~ lava tube) • gas jet from a circular vent