1 / 39

Figure 1. Infrastructure map

Detailed assessment of ecological landscapes, threats, and reserve effectiveness in GAENP for sustainable conservation planning. Implementation priorities and irreplaceability-vulnerability analysis included.

finks
Download Presentation

Figure 1. Infrastructure map

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Figure 1. Infrastructure map

  2. Figure 2. Upland-lowland interfaces

  3. Figure 3. Biome interfaces

  4. Figure 4. Thicket interfaces

  5. Figure 5. Riverine corridors linking inland and coastal biotas

  6. Figure 6. Riverine corridors through mountainous terrain

  7. Figure 7. Algoa dunefield with 500 m buffered inland boundary

  8. Figure 8: Algoa dunefield with 2000 m buffered inland boundary

  9. Figure 9. Rainfall gradients as drought refuges in drought-prone habitat

  10. Figure 10. All ecological and evolutionary processes combined

  11. Natural Grazed Agriculture Settlement Natural Estuary Figure 11. Current Land use in the planning domain

  12. High density Medium density Low density GAENP Boundary Figure 12. The current extent of alien invasive plants

  13. Figure 13. Restorability of the landscape

  14. Darlington Dam Future threat weightings Medium High Figure 14. Composite threat weighting for each land class

  15. Darlington Dam Threat weightings Low Medium High Figure 15. The distribution of grazing threats in the landscape

  16. Darlington Dam Threat weightings Low Medium High Figure 16. The distribution of cultivation threats in the landscape

  17. Darlington Dam Threat weightings Low Medium High Figure 17. The distribution of potential human settlement-related disturbance in the landscape

  18. Darlington Dam Threat weightings Low Medium High Figure 18. The distribution of potential alien threats in the landscape

  19. Figure 19. The percentage of intact area required by each landclass to meet its’ overall target

  20. Figure 20 The extent of transformation of the spatially defined landscape processes in the GAENP planning domain

  21. Figure 21. The existing reserve system (both statutory and non-statutory) and land earmarked for purchase within the GAENP planning domain. (Numbers on the map are referred to in the text.)

  22. Figure 22. Effectiveness of the existing and earmarked reserve system for the protection of primary level land classes.

  23. Figure 23 Effectiveness of the existing and earmarked reserve system for the protection of secondary level land classes.

  24. Figure 24 Effectiveness of the existing and earmarked reserve system for the protection of larger mammals.

  25. Figure 25. Effectiveness of the existing and earmarked reserve system for the protection of landscape level processes.

  26. Figure 26 The distribution of upland-lowland and biome interfaces in relation to the existing and earmarked reserve system. Numbers on the map are referred to in the text.

  27. Figure 27. The distribution of thicket interfaces in relation to the existing and earmarked reserve system. Numbers on the map are referred to in the text.

  28. Figure 28. The distribution of north-south and east-west riverine corridors in relation to the existing and earmarked reserve system. Numbers on the map are referred to in the text.

  29. Figure 29. The distribution of sand-movement corridors in relation to the existing and earmarked reserve system. Numbers on the map are referred to in the text.

  30. Figure 30. The distribution of drought refuge rainfall gradients in relation to the existing and earmarked reserve system. Numbers on the map are referred to in the text.

  31. Figure 31. Patterns of irreplaceability for achieving land class targets in the GAENP planning domain

  32. Figure 32. Patterns of irreplaceability for achieving mammals targets in the GAENP planning domain

  33. Figure 33. Patterns of irreplaceability for achieving process targets in the GAENP planning domain

  34. Figure 34. Patterns of irreplaceability across the GAENP planning domain after the selection of statutory reserves (Step 1).

  35. Figure 35. Patterns of irreplaceability across the GAENP planning domain after the selection of farm properties containing processes (Step 2).

  36. Figure 36. Patterns of irreplaceability across the GAENP planning domain after the selection of rivers and the GAENP-MPA (Steps 3 and 4).

  37. Figure 37. The notional conservation system for the GAENP planning domain derived from the set of criteria followed in Steps 1-6.

  38. Figure 38. Irreplaceability-vulnerability graph used to derive implementation priority.

  39. Figure 39. Map showing implementation priorities within the GAENP planning domain.

More Related