210 likes | 404 Views
WECC Standards Committee. WECC Board of Directors Meeting December 5, 2012. Overview. Snapshot of Standards Activities Request approval WECC-0076 WECC-0065 RBP WECC-0065 “Plan” Request Guidance on Procedure. Standards Activity. WECC-0046 Voltage and Reactive Control
E N D
WECC Standards Committee WECC Board of Directors Meeting December 5, 2012
Overview • Snapshot of Standards Activities • Request approval • WECC-0076 • WECC-0065 RBP • WECC-0065 “Plan” • Request Guidance on Procedure
Standards Activity • WECC-0046 Voltage and Reactive Control • NERC reports finalizing for FERC filing • WECC-0068 “ATEC” • Filed October 2012 for December 2012 NERC BOT • WECC-0083 BAL-002-WECC-2 • Filed October 2012 for November NERC BOT • WECC-0096 IRO-006 Redraft • Targeted for ballot January 2012
RBP Overview • Ready to Ballot (within 60 days) • WECC-0077 Reliability Curtailments RBP • WECC-0078 Capacity e-tag Functionality RBP • WECC-0079 Ten Minute Recallable RBP • WECC-0081 WECC Interchange Tool RBP • WECC-0087 Dynamic Scheduling RBP
On the Horizon • Review and redraft of Charter • NERC/FERC review is not required • Review and redraft of Procedures • NERC/FERC review is required • 4 SARs to evaluate RBP as Standards • PRC-001-WECC-RBP-1 • PRC-024-WECC-RBP-0 • TLP-001-WECC-RBP-2 • VAR-502-WECC-RBP-0
Request for Approval RPB • WECC-0076 • Interchange Prescheduling Regional Business Practice
WECC-0076 Negative Votes • Overview • 13 “No” votes • 4 = Should be Guideline • 4 = Should be Regional Business Practice • 4 = Too restrictive on scheduling practices • 1= Requirements conflict with narrative guidance
Request for Approval RBP • Motion to accept WECC-0076, INT-003-WECC-RBP-2, Interchange Prescheduling Regional Business Practice as presented, and retire its predecessor, INT-003-WECC-CRT-1, Interchange Prescheduling Criterion.
Request for Approval RPB • WECC-0065 • Underfrequency Load Shedding Business Practice
WECC-0065 Negative Votes RBP • 49 “No” RBP • Approximately 30 sets of comments on each were duplicative • Majority of these issues raised in the 30 duplicative comments were first raised after the document was posted for ballot
WECC-0065 Negative Votes RBP • Overview • The Applicable Entities are inaccurate • ‘UFLS Entities” should be changed to entities responsible for operation and/or control of the UFLS equipment. • The Applicable Facilities is too inclusive • Should have an exclusion for smaller entities • The reporting requirements apply to the inaccurate entity • Should apply to the UFLS Program owners, not UFLS Entities • Requirements are ambiguous and needs clarification / footnotes • May conflict with NERC PRC-006 • May take generation off line needlessly
Request for Approval RBP • Motion to accept WECC-0065, PRC-006-WECC-RBP-1, Underfrequency Load Shedding Regional Business Practice, and retire its predecessor.
Request for Approval “Plan” • WECC-0065 • Underfrequency Load Shedding Coordinated Plan
WECC-0065 Negative Votes Plan • 40 “No” Plan • Approximately 30 sets of comments on each were duplicative • Majority of these issues raised in the 30 duplicative comments were first raised after the document was posted for ballot
WECC-0065 Negative Votes Plan • Overview • Virtually the same as for the Regional Business Practice • Inaccurate Applicable Entities • Inaccurate Applicable Facilities • Inaccurate Reporting Parties • Ambiguous in need of clarification and footnotes • May conflict with NERC PRC-006 • May take generation off line needlessly
Request for Approval “Plan” • Motion to accept WECC-0065, PRC-006-WECC-RBP-1, Underfrequency Load Shedding Coordinated Plan, and retire its predecessor.
Request for Guidance • From the Minutes • Board consensus “was that all documents impacting sanctionable standards should be processed through the standards development process.” • April 2009
Request for Guidance • Board approved • WECC-0055 /WECC-0059 (FITBs) • WECC-0074 (FITB) approaching completion with same structure • Structure • Allows a WECC Subcommittee to recommend changes to content of Attachments • Followed by WECC Standing Committee approving the recommendation • RBP Developed under the “Procedures” • RBP Modified under the WECC Bylaw/Standing Committee Due Process
Request for Guidance • Query • Did the Board mean all FITB documents should be developed using the Procedures? • Did the Board mean all changes to a FITB document should be developed using the Procedures?