10 likes | 20 Views
Study spanning 100 years in Illinois shows drastic changes in bird populations due to evolving land use practices. Bird habitats transformed significantly, with forested areas expanding while grassland bird species declined sharply. Generalists dominate, while new species and range expansions observed. Historic surveys replicated to track changes. Researchers use modern technology to track bird distribution, abundance, and diversity compared to the past. Examining factors driving shifts, from land use to climate change. Valuable insights for conservation efforts and understanding avian ecosystems in Illinois.
E N D
100 Years of Changing Bird Populations in Illinois Study Sites The locations surveyed 100 years ago are vaguely known. Gross and Ray typically took trains to starting points, and walked for several days to another railroad, counting and collecting birds along the way, sleeping in hotels, barns or homes when they were invited. In the 1950s, the Graber’s surveyed from 96 locations (described with varying precision), split evenly among northern, central, and southern Illinois. We originated our surveys from each of these 96 areas, sampling all land cover types within about 3 miles of that point. The hand-held computers used for entering bird data in ‘real time’ during transects and point-counts include a GPS receiver that logged our location every 5 seconds. Results Changes in land cover/land use have been dramatic over the past century. Corn has consistently been the dominant land use, with soybeans becoming important after about 1930. Forested areas have expanded steadily since 1920. Small grains, hay, and pasture (collectively), have been reduced from 50% of the state’s area in 1900, to about 7% in 2000. Bird communities within some habitats have changed profoundly, particularly grasslands. Meadowlarks, dickcissels, bobolinks, and grasshopper sparrows (“grasslanders,” below, left) were 40% of the birds found in grasslands in the 1900s, 35% in the 1950s, and 13% at present. In contrast, forest bird communities have been relatively stable (below, right). Other Interesting Notes… The Rich Keep Getting Richer, the Poor Keep Getting Poorer: Just 5 abundant generalists – red-winged blackbird, European starling, common grackle, American robin, house sparrow –made up 55% of all birds recorded. More than 40 species, present in small numbers the 1900s and 1950s, went undetected. Southern Birds Expand Northward: Red-bellied woodpeckers, Carolina wrens, northern cardinals, and tufted titmice occur farther north at great abundance than 100 years ago. Are land use, practices such as bird-feeding, or climate change behind these shifts? “New” to the Survey: Absent in the 1900s or 1950s, but again nesting in Illinois, are sandhill cranes, bald eagles, Canada geese, and wild turkeys. House finches and Eurasian collared-doves are recently-introduced birds, now found statewide. Land Cover of Illinois, 1900-2000 Replicating Historic Surveys From 1906-1909, Alfred Gross & Harold Ray (right), directed by Stephen Forbes, sampled birds in various habitats throughout Illinois. These surveys were the first quantitative descriptions of the bird communities within various land cover types. Richard and Jean Graber used the same methods to measure avian diversity and abundance in habitat types in northern, central and southern Illinois. Their work from 1956-1958 examined changes over the preceding 50 years, and estimated statewide populations for several common species. We repeated these surveys from 2006-2008, and are comparing distribution, abundance and richness of bird species to results from 50 and 100 years ago. Jeffery W. Walk, The Nature Conservancy, Michael P. Ward and Steven D. Bailey, Illinois Natural History Survey, andJeffrey D. Brawn, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign Sampling Effort, By the Numbers: 20,164 individual birds Of 132 species Recorded on 963 transects Totaling 54,743 meters Representing 23 habitat types. Birds Encountered in Grasslands Birds Encountered in Forests Methods Forbes was an aquatic entomologist, and apparently regarded sampling birds in the field similarly to sampling bugs in a stream. He described the method he devised as: “…a gigantic sweep-net, 150 feet wide and 300 feet deep, so drawn across the country day by day as to capture every bird which comes in its way…” Two observers walk in parallel lines, often for miles, recording birds seen between and up to 300 feet in front of them. Because more birds are heard, but not seen, as vegetation height and density increase, the Graber’s dryly noted: “…the strip census is not well adapted to woodland areas.” To supplement the unusual transect method, and to account for birds heard but not seen, we conducted paired-observer, 5-minute point-counts with distance estimation. These results will be more comparable with other contemporary surveys, such as the North American Breeding Bird Survey. Winners… Birds of suburbs and forest edges, water birds (herons, geese, gulls) …and Losers Grassland, shrubland, savanna, and marsh birds Funding for this study is from the State Wildlife Grants Program, project T-16-P-1. Special thanks to hundreds of landowners!