1 / 37

PORTFOLIO COMMITTEE ON DEFENCE

PORTFOLIO COMMITTEE ON DEFENCE. PRESENTATION OF CIVIC EDUCATION EVALUATION AND ADVISORY BOARD. CIVIC EDUCATION EVALUATION & ADVISORY BOARD: 2ND ANNUAL REPORT, 2003. THE CIVIC EDUCATION PROGRAMME IN THE DOD. Abbreviations & terms. Beirat German Armed Forces CEEAB

floyd
Download Presentation

PORTFOLIO COMMITTEE ON DEFENCE

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. PORTFOLIO COMMITTEE ON DEFENCE • PRESENTATION OF CIVIC EDUCATION EVALUATION AND ADVISORY BOARD

  2. CIVIC EDUCATION EVALUATION & ADVISORY BOARD: 2ND ANNUAL REPORT, 2003 THE CIVIC EDUCATION PROGRAMME IN THE DOD

  3. Abbreviations & terms • Beirat German Armed Forces CEEAB • CD Chief Director/Directorate • CE Civic Education • CECE Civic Education Centre of Excellence • CEP CE Programme • DBW German Armed Forces • LOAC Law of Armed Conflict • PSAP Public Service Act Personnel • SecDef Secretary for Defence • Trg Training

  4. Objects of Report To provide to the Minister of Defence • CEEAB’s views of the CEP in 2003 • A report on CEEAB’s activities

  5. Scope of Report • Structure, role, powers, membership of CEEAB • Civic Education – concepts & purpose • The CEP in 2003 • CEEAB’s activities in 2003. • Conclusions

  6. THE CEEAB • Is Responsible to the Minister of Defence

  7. Structure of CEEAB • Full Members - Part-time and few • Official Members • Invited Persons

  8. Roles of CEEAB • observe, evaluate & report on implementation, development, enhancement & continuation of CE Programme (CEP) in DOD • to advise the Minister of Defence as necessary. • TERMS of Reference Ministerial Policy Directives & CEEAB’s Constitution .

  9. POWERS OF CEEAB CEEAB only Evaluates & ADVISES - EXERCISES NO AUTHORITY WHATSOEVER

  10. Full Members in 2003 Eight in 2003 • Chairperson - Banker (2002 - ). • 2 MPs • 3 University Lecturers • 2 Research Institute Directors

  11. Official Members 2003 Eight • Secretary for Defence • Chief Policy & Plans • CD EO and AA • Res F P • Representatives of C Army, C Air Force, C Navy, Surgeon Gen

  12. Secretariat of CEEAB • One shared Defence Secretariat Official • No other Staff

  13. CIVIC EDUCATION PROGRAMME • The Concept of Civic Education. • Requirements • Finances

  14. CIVIC EDUCATION PROGRAMME • PURPOSES OF CEP – to ensure that • DOD observes constitutional principles, democratic values & law • Military personnel treat each other & public with respect and dignity • Normative dimensions of military professionalism strengthened

  15. CIVIC EDUCATION PROGRAMME (2) • Public confidence and public pride in the SANDF is built • Patriotism, loyalty, unity, discipline, morale & combat readiness in SANDF are built • CE Contributes to preparing SANDF for South Africa's international obligations

  16. THE CIVIC EDUCATION PROGRAMME in 2003 • Evaluation of Civic Education Teaching in 2003 • SA Naval Staff College • Military Academy

  17. CE Impact Analysis Survey (1) • Purpose – To Assess goal Achievement of CEP • The Sample - 2 277 – • Reg F military & SecDef civilians • [12.3% = 261 CEP Trg in past 2 Years] • Courses sample had attended • Respect for Cultural Diversity: 71.7% • The Constitution & the Bill of Rights: 62.2%

  18. CE Impact Analysis Survey (2) • Mil. Professionalism in a Democracy: 54.0% • International Humanitarian Law: 52.9% • Civil Military Relations: 52.7% • Democratic Political Process: 45.8%

  19. CE Impact Analysis Survey (3) • Relevance & Tuition – Responded that - • CE Relevant to needs : 66,1% • CE Irrelevant : 11,2% • Trg Satisfactory/ Very Satisfactory : 60,7% • Trg Unsatisfactory : 8%

  20. CE Impact Analysis Survey (4) • Attitudes to DOD were - • Uniformed pers positive to leaders’ respect for human dignity: 48.1% • Agree democratic principles apply in DOD: 54.5% • Agree DOD must be politically neutral: 76.8% • Uniformed pers who understand rules of war 89.4%

  21. CE Impact Analysis Survey (5) • Positive attitudes to CE - Highest levels - • Service/ Division: Def Sec/Corp Staff/Def Int 19.2% • Rank Levels: Senior Officers 17.0% • Demographic group Asian 15.6%

  22. CE Impact Analysis Survey (6) Percent who - • Understand Code of Conduct: 89,2% • Positive to military professionalism: 81,8% • Positive to commitment to excellence: 76,9% • Agree their units well prepared for mission: 70,8% • Able to recite principles of Code of Conduct: 84,1%

  23. CE Impact Analysis Survey (7) • Uniformed pers positive to loyalty to SANDF/ DOD 39.5% • Uniformed pers proud to say they are in SANDF 82.7%

  24. CE Impact Analysis Survey (8) • Comment • Large response 2 277 • Sample responding reliable • CE well received, positive effects, achieves desired results • If more Trained, greater effect sooner • Very satisfying about CE Impact if questionnaire well-drafted

  25. TRAINING CAPACITIES 2003 • The Centre of Excellence for CE - failed to achieve significant aims • Staffing 18/ 31 inadequately trained, inexperienced, no permanent commander for three years • CECE - no impact on higher echelons of DOD

  26. TRAINING CAPACITIES 2003 (2) • CE trg inadequacies: no formal teaching & standards, no specialist instructors • CECE RECOMMENDATIONS: Restructuring & relocation in DOD, clear vision, new, educated personnel to provide & monitor CE, research & development, supervise training, to give internal support to DOD, staff for CEEAB

  27. INSTITUTIONALISATION OF CEP • INTERNAL TEACHING - SAAF College established CE Branch & formally assesses CE in courses • CEEAB view - civilian & military teachers desirable • Defence Secretariat - SecDef wants CEP for PSA Personnel but too few sent - not being institutionalised – May repeat 1913-1966 differences

  28. INSTITUTIONALISATION OF CEP • Reserve Force - No Reports of CE trg for majority of officers & NCOs • Senior Officers & Warrant Officers – Impression that are uninformed about CE • Instructors - Insufficient internal facilitators & instructors - affects institutionalizing CE • Facilities - C Navy proposed facilities for developing case studies / scenarios for full impact of CEP

  29. TRAINING ACHIEVEMENTS • External deployment - SA Army provided CE to all deployed in DRC & Burundi and are satisfied with result • Services’ Training achievements - - see tables

  30. Personnel Trained 2003

  31. LEVELS AT WHICH CEP WAS TAUGHT IN SERVICES 2003.

  32. CEEAB’S ACTIVITIES 2003 • Full Members – voluntary, few, activities restricted by Careers • Regular Meetings • Met Parliamentary Committee • Meetings - Minister and Sec Defence • Revised the Curricula • Standing Operating Procedures (2)

  33. CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS • Impact Analysis - shows positive results from CEP despite shortcomings • CECE - Full Development essential • Instructors - uniform training important to quality of CEP

  34. CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS (2) • Organisation - CEP must be part of strong centre of command & staffing for direction, adequate support & a future • PSA Personnel - must be part of whole DOD & must understand civil control & civil military relations

  35. CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS (3) • Reserve Force must have CE Training • Senior Officers & Officials - must have CE training to Institutionalize • Shared Values - training in Shared Values must replace CD soon • Staff Support for CEP and CEEAB –essential to institutionalize

  36. THANK YOU • COMMENTS/QUESTIONS?

More Related