210 likes | 352 Views
ACADEMIC PERFORMANCE AUDIT ON AREA 1, AREA 2 AND AREA 3 BY ACA. OUTLINE. CODE OF PRACTICE FOR INSTITUITIONAL AUDIT(COPIA) THE STANDARDS – Benchmarked and Enhanced GUIDELINES ON THE STANDARDS AND CRITERIA FOR THE NINE AREAS OF EVALUATION FOR ACADEMIC PERFORMANCE AUDIT
E N D
ACADEMIC PERFORMANCE AUDIT ON AREA 1, AREA 2 AND AREA 3 BY ACA
OUTLINE • CODE OF PRACTICE FOR INSTITUITIONAL AUDIT(COPIA) • THE STANDARDS – Benchmarked and Enhanced • GUIDELINES ON THE STANDARDS AND CRITERIA FOR THE NINE AREAS OF EVALUATION FOR ACADEMIC PERFORMANCE AUDIT • Vision , Mission, Educational Goals and Learning Outcomes • Curriculum Design and Delivery • Assessment of Students • Student Selection and Support Services • Academic Staff • Educational Resources • Programme Monitoring and Review • Leadership, Governance and Administration • Continual Quality Improvement
AREA 1- VISION, MISSION, EDUCATIONAL GOALS AND LEARNING OUTCOMES • Guidesthe higher education provider (HEP) in its academic planning and implementation and • Produce graduates through : • the provision of knowledge, skills, a quest for life long learning, and inculcation of values, and • nurturing of the ability toanalyze and solve problems and • consideration of other relevant issues
AREA 1.1: Statement of Vision, Mission and Educational Goals
AREA 1.2 Participation in the Formulation of Vision, Mission & Educational Goals
AREA 2 : CURRICULUM DESIGN AND DELIVERY • AREA 2 is on curriculum design and delivery It is divided into 4 subsections: • Curriculum design & teaching and learning methods; • Curriculum content and structure; • Management of the programme; and • Linkages with external stakeholders .
Area 2.1 -Curriculum Design & Teaching - Learning (T-L)Methods • musthave its defined processfor curriculum establishment , review and evaluation • The Programme must only be considered after a needs assessment has indicate d there is a need for them to be conducted • mustbe considered only after resources to support it identified • Aims and objectives of all programmes must be consistent with the HEP vision and mission • The Programme Content , approach & T-L Methods mustbe appropriate, consistent , and support the achievement of programme learning outcomes • Teaching-learning activities must be consistent with the curriculum there mustbe variety • To achieve the eight domains of learning outcomes • The Curriculumshould encourage multi-disciplinary approaches to enhance personal development of students • Theneeds analysis should involve external sources feedback • Co-curricular activities should be there to enrich student experience
The Programme Content & Delivery must • be regularly reviewed and evaluated and its results utilised to assure quality (must involve external examiners – for MQF level 6 and above ) • The Students must : • be provided with the most current information of programme aims, out-line, learning outcomes and assessment methods • The Programme must : • havea coordinator and a team of appropriate staff • haveauthority and established procedures • begiven adequate resources • - for implementation and evaluation for quality improvement Area 2.3 - Management of the Programme The Students The Programme Team The Programme
AREA 3 – ASSESSMENT OF STUDENTS • It is a crucial aspect of quality assuranceand • One of the most important measuresto show the achievement of learning outcomes.