320 likes | 413 Views
Savanna burning in a climate changed economy North Australia’s contributions to national adaptation and mitigation efforts. Lindsay Hutley (CDU) Jeremy Russell-Smith (NTG). Talk outline. What and where are the savannas? Climate change impacts on this ecosystem
E N D
Savanna burning in a climate changed economyNorth Australia’s contributions to national adaptation and mitigation efforts Lindsay Hutley (CDU) Jeremy Russell-Smith (NTG)
Talk outline • What and where are the savannas? • Climate change impacts on this ecosystem • Savanna burning as a mitigation activity – the WALFA program • Partial and full carbon accounting – the carbon economy
Savannas across north Australia • Tree-grass mixtures: competitive co-exisitance
Savannas burn every year • Dry season - highly flammable landscape • Fire emits GHGs CO2, methane, N20 Photo Sam Setterfield
Savanna burning • 1-3% of national GHG emissions, 35-50% of NT emissions • Impact of climate change on savanna burning?
Climate trends – rainfall 2010/2011 Wet Top End 3000-1700 mm Centre 400-600 mm
Climate change and savanna landscapes • How will climate change affect these landscapes? • Savanna structure and productivity shaped by climate and fire interactions • Reduce or increase productivity (sink)? Or no change? CO2
Savanna fire risk • Living with climate change • Hotter, wetter wet, more CO2 productivity may increase = increased fuel • Hotter dry season = fire risk enhanced • Invasive grasses across mesic savanna adds to risk • GHG mitigation via fire management • manage fire differently to reduce greenhouse gas emissions • Case study – Western Arnhemland Fire Abatement Scheme (WALFA) • Experiment in landscape scale fire management
WALFA – GHG abatement scheme • Savanna GHG emission likely to increase • Fire regime change over time • de-population of many Aboriginal lands • lack of resources to manage vast landscapes • late dry season high severity / high impact fires more prevalent • biodiversity loss • Solution WALFA?
Co-occurrence of restricted range and endemic species Woinarski et al. 2005, 2009
WALFA – savanna fire abatement scheme • Western Arnhemland region chosen – 25 000 km2 • Significant biodiversity hot spot • Significant fire problem • Unique partnership between traditional owners, NT and Commonwealth Governments and private funders • Aims • Shift fire regimes at landscape scales • Reintroduce traditional burning regime, increase early dry season fires and patchiness • Accurately quantify savanna GHG emission factors • Develop remote sensing techniques to map fires and calculate emissions
WALFA – savanna fire abatement scheme Accountable emissions of non-CO2gases 2004-2010
Top End 2011 Fire scars
(b) GHG Emissions Pre-project baseline • WALFA • program • Seasonality of burning
Five Projects Across Northern Australia Potential for ~0.5 Mt CO2-e y-1 abatement
Savanna burning and fire abatement • But there’s more ... • WALFA partial carbon accounting • only non-CO2 gases emitted accountable under IPCC rules • Full carbon accounting • Account for all components of the GHG balance • Sequestration in vegetation and soil - CO2 uptake and loss • Shift in fire regime to EDS mosaics will enhance tree productivity and carbon sink • Soil carbon ??
CH4 N2O CH4 N2O WALFA - Non-CO2savanna GHG fluxes
CO2 CO2 Rleaf Fos Rwood Rsom Rroot Fus C Savanna carbon balance – full carbon accounting CO2 Soil carbon Above and below ground biomass pools GPP, NPP, NEP, NBP
Investigate savanna fire cycle on mass and energy exchange
Enhanced savanna ‘fire sink’ • For lowland savanna of WALFA area • Known area of 12984 km2 • For savanna • carbon sink small and sensitive to fire regime • assume sink is low, ~0.1 t C ha-1 y-1 • Sequestration with EDS mosaic – 0.48 Mt CO2-e y-1 • Emissions abatement with EDS mosaic – 0.15Mt CO2-e y-1 • WALFA sequestration under current rules not accountable • Difficult to quantify over space and time
Conclusions • Climate change likely to promote flammability • WALFA program has reduced emissions by 50% of managed area • Savanna fire return time (1-3 y) means an emissions saving every year is achievable • Other benefits • Income stream for remote Aboriginal custodians • Transform social and biodiversity landscape • Likely to enhance carbon sink as an ecosystem service • Developed methodology to be included in Carbon Farming Initiative • A 1 or 2%+ emissions reduction may be nationally significant