290 likes | 302 Views
FP7 FMTXCT Project UMCE-HGUGM first year activity report Partner FIHGM. Laboratorio de Imagen M é dica. Medicina Experimental Hospital Universitario Gregorio Mara ñó n, Madrid. Workpackage 2: XCT development Workpackage 8: FMT-XCT imaging accuracy versus PET-XCT.
E N D
FP7 FMTXCT ProjectUMCE-HGUGM first year activity report Partner FIHGM Laboratorio de Imagen Médica. Medicina Experimental Hospital Universitario Gregorio Marañón, Madrid
Workpackage 2: XCT development • Workpackage 8: FMT-XCT imaging accuracy versus PET-XCT
Workpackage 2: XCT development • Use of X-ray contrast agents • Double exposure techniques • Dual energy X-ray source
CT System Outline Mechanical Design
Multi-Energy data acquisition/processing New Tube Features
Detector Dynamic Range Expansion Dual-Exposure technique • Main features • Two datasets acquired • First • Low SNR for dense materials • Detector not saturated for soft materials • Second • High SNR for dense materials • Detector saturated for soft materials • Same X-ray beam spectral properties • Different photon flux
Detector Dynamic Range Expansion Dual-Exposure technique Dataset #1 Dataset #2
Detector Dynamic Range Expansion Dual-Exposure technique (work in progress) Dual exposure Single exposure CNR (PTFE/Air) = 22.11 CNR (PTFE/Air) = 13.91
Multi-Energy data acquisition/processing Simulated Spectra for the new tube • Changing filter setting Mean Energy = 55.6 kV Mean Energy = 66.1 kV Spectral simulations carried out using SPEKTR software libraries Siewerdsen, et.al., “Spektr: A computational tool for x-ray spectral analysis and imaging system optimization”, Med. Phys.31(9), 2004
Multi-Energy data acquisition/processing Simulated Spectra for the new tube • Changing X-ray tube setting Mean Energy = 34.9 kV Mean Energy = 66.1 kV
Use of X-ray contrast agents Fenestra Iopamiro
Mouse 200 µA, voltage 50 kV 200 µm Fenestra LC Mouse 200 µA, voltage 50 kV 200 µm Iopamiro
Mouse 200 µA, voltage 50 kV 200 µm Iopamiro Dynamic study
Materials selection for the optical phantom construction Silicon Ti02 Pro Jet Polyester resin Bulk materials Scatterers Absorbers + + Lipid emulsions (Intralipid) Polymer microspheres India ink Water Gelatin
Resolution is depth dependent Diffusion approximation: One photon mean free path ≈ 1mm Source Things to have in mind when designing a FMT phantom. Source Detector
Things to have in mind when designing a FMT phantom. Heterogeneities, surface
Fluorescent spheres, 2 mm (Should their size vary?) Heterogeneities 4 mm Phantom design
How to insert the fluorophore in the phantom? Resin vs Silicon - Mix the fluorophore with the bulk material* - Capillaries (diffusive-non diffusive interfaces) - Pellets * John Baeten et al “Development of fluorescent materials for Diffuse Fluorescence Tomography standars and phantoms” Optics express vol 15 2007
What to measure Resolution. FWHM of point-like source? Quantification accuracy Sensitivity: In-vivo specific application PET phantom remarks
Will the imaging performance hold in the “many body imaging situation”?
Detector Dynamic Range Expansion Dual-Exposure technique • Main features • X-ray tube current calculation for the second scan • Based on Histogran processing • Shift the histogram to place 75% of the total value into the High-Gain region • Dataset combination • Detector Model • Image combination based on a Maximum-Likelihood calculation assuming Independent Gaussian distribution. • i : Acquisition number • j : Pixel number • A: Current value • N: Noise value
coronal Z=0.25 cm Resultados preliminares, maniquíes: Planar imaging Agar based, TiO2 (scatter), Blank ink (absorption)