90 likes | 230 Views
The LMVJV Reforestation Tracking System. Reforestation : the re-establishment of a forested land use on areas that were previously converted from a forested to non-forested land use e-RTS Internet-accessible data entry and query application Data is “housed” in a relational database
E N D
The LMVJV Reforestation Tracking System • Reforestation: the re-establishment of a forested land use on areas that were previously converted from a forested to non-forested land use • e-RTS • Internet-accessible data entry and query application • Data is “housed” in a relational database • Designed to serve as a central repository for reforestation data • Managed and served by the LMV Joint Venture Office as a service to Joint Venture partners
Why an LMVJV Reforestation Tracking System? • Reforestation is a common LMVJV partner conservation action that is inherently spatial and temporal • Document the collective contributions of multiple programs / organizations to meet landscape goals and objectives • To assess partnership progress and inform adaptive approach to conservation, need to know • Where was it done? • How much was done? • How was it done? • Where are the high priority places? • e-RTS: Example of a value-added service required to achieve NABCI goal: “regionally based, biologically driven, landscape-oriented” conservation Spring 2004 MBM Notebook: Revised LMVJV Business Model, pg 4
Partner Landholdings Why an LMVJV Reforestation Tracking System? Assess and inform the collective contributions to LMVJV landscape goals both spatially and temporally
Forest Core Forest Why an LMVJV Reforestation Tracking System? Assess and inform the protection and management of “core” habitat for area-sensitive wildlife
Higher Lower Reforestation Priorities Forest Property Boundaries Why an LMVJV Reforestation Tracking System? Assess and inform the restoration of the most environmentally sensitive portions of the landscape
Why this kind of Reforestation Tracking System? e-RTS takes advantage of two information technologies to help track a common conservation practice comprehensively and efficiently • The relational database design • The Internet • A relational database is good for • Efficient storage of data • Efficient access to “answers” that can be gleaned from specific questions (e. g., queries) • Efficient data maintenance • Internet applications for data entry and access are good for • Efficient entry of data • Maintenance of data quality during data entry • Maintenance of data standards • User-friendly data access
Why this kind of Reforestation Tracking System? Beneficial Results • Comprehensive data set: Foresters chose the set of tracked parameters • Common set of parameters: Foresters chose data standards • Improve landscape planning, assessment, and evaluative research • Centralized: Reduce individual organization’s costs for hardware, software and personnel to design, build, and maintain system • Efficient / Convenient: Reduce data entry time and speed access to data summaries • Reduce program costs • Increase use of data for land management decisions
Data entry via e-RTS web interface • Data entry system • Guides user through data entry process • Prevents common data entry errors • Increases data entry speed • Insures standardization of data • Improves data quality • Facilitates data updates • Improves data accessibility